Cargando…

Minimally invasive perineal redo surgery for rectovesical and rectovaginal fistulae: A case series

INTRODUCTION: Iatrogenic recto-urogenital fistulae are refractory complications that rarely heal without surgical intervention. The ongoing local infection causes pain, discomfort and substantially impacts quality of life. Surgical repair requires adequate exposure and space to fill with healthy tis...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Grüter, A.A.J., Van Oostendorp, S.E., Smits, L.J.H., Kusters, M., Özer, M., Nieuwenhuijzen, J.A., Tuynman, J.B.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7724097/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33395885
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijscr.2020.11.067
_version_ 1783620478598905856
author Grüter, A.A.J.
Van Oostendorp, S.E.
Smits, L.J.H.
Kusters, M.
Özer, M.
Nieuwenhuijzen, J.A.
Tuynman, J.B.
author_facet Grüter, A.A.J.
Van Oostendorp, S.E.
Smits, L.J.H.
Kusters, M.
Özer, M.
Nieuwenhuijzen, J.A.
Tuynman, J.B.
author_sort Grüter, A.A.J.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Iatrogenic recto-urogenital fistulae are refractory complications that rarely heal without surgical intervention. The ongoing local infection causes pain, discomfort and substantially impacts quality of life. Surgical repair requires adequate exposure and space to fill with healthy tissue, which is a major challenge in pelvic redo surgery. An abdominal approach to repair the fistula is associated with major morbidity and often fails to expose the deep pelvis. In our experience a novel transperineal minimally invasive approach a utilizing single incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) technique could offer improved results. PRESENTATION OF CASES: In the present study, three cases of patients with recto-urogenital fistulae after pelvic surgery are described. Two patients were diagnosed with a rectovesical fistula and one patient with a rectovaginal fistula. In all three cases, a minimally invasive perineal approach, using a SILS port, was used to perform surgical repair. The closure of the fistulae involved: a separate repair of the urethra/bladder or vaginal defect and the rectal defect, followed by interposition of vascularized tissue by either a pudendal thigh fasciocutaneous flap or omentoplasty. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: This study is the first to report on a minimally invasive perineal approach, utilizing a SILS technique for recto-urogenital fistulae repair after previous pelvic surgery. The current approach improves exposure, creates surgical space, optimizes view and allows the interposition of vascularized tissue, without causing substantial blood loss and avoiding major abdominal surgery.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7724097
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77240972020-12-13 Minimally invasive perineal redo surgery for rectovesical and rectovaginal fistulae: A case series Grüter, A.A.J. Van Oostendorp, S.E. Smits, L.J.H. Kusters, M. Özer, M. Nieuwenhuijzen, J.A. Tuynman, J.B. Int J Surg Case Rep Case Series INTRODUCTION: Iatrogenic recto-urogenital fistulae are refractory complications that rarely heal without surgical intervention. The ongoing local infection causes pain, discomfort and substantially impacts quality of life. Surgical repair requires adequate exposure and space to fill with healthy tissue, which is a major challenge in pelvic redo surgery. An abdominal approach to repair the fistula is associated with major morbidity and often fails to expose the deep pelvis. In our experience a novel transperineal minimally invasive approach a utilizing single incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) technique could offer improved results. PRESENTATION OF CASES: In the present study, three cases of patients with recto-urogenital fistulae after pelvic surgery are described. Two patients were diagnosed with a rectovesical fistula and one patient with a rectovaginal fistula. In all three cases, a minimally invasive perineal approach, using a SILS port, was used to perform surgical repair. The closure of the fistulae involved: a separate repair of the urethra/bladder or vaginal defect and the rectal defect, followed by interposition of vascularized tissue by either a pudendal thigh fasciocutaneous flap or omentoplasty. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: This study is the first to report on a minimally invasive perineal approach, utilizing a SILS technique for recto-urogenital fistulae repair after previous pelvic surgery. The current approach improves exposure, creates surgical space, optimizes view and allows the interposition of vascularized tissue, without causing substantial blood loss and avoiding major abdominal surgery. Elsevier 2020-11-19 /pmc/articles/PMC7724097/ /pubmed/33395885 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijscr.2020.11.067 Text en © 2020 The Author(s) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Case Series
Grüter, A.A.J.
Van Oostendorp, S.E.
Smits, L.J.H.
Kusters, M.
Özer, M.
Nieuwenhuijzen, J.A.
Tuynman, J.B.
Minimally invasive perineal redo surgery for rectovesical and rectovaginal fistulae: A case series
title Minimally invasive perineal redo surgery for rectovesical and rectovaginal fistulae: A case series
title_full Minimally invasive perineal redo surgery for rectovesical and rectovaginal fistulae: A case series
title_fullStr Minimally invasive perineal redo surgery for rectovesical and rectovaginal fistulae: A case series
title_full_unstemmed Minimally invasive perineal redo surgery for rectovesical and rectovaginal fistulae: A case series
title_short Minimally invasive perineal redo surgery for rectovesical and rectovaginal fistulae: A case series
title_sort minimally invasive perineal redo surgery for rectovesical and rectovaginal fistulae: a case series
topic Case Series
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7724097/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33395885
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijscr.2020.11.067
work_keys_str_mv AT gruteraaj minimallyinvasiveperinealredosurgeryforrectovesicalandrectovaginalfistulaeacaseseries
AT vanoostendorpse minimallyinvasiveperinealredosurgeryforrectovesicalandrectovaginalfistulaeacaseseries
AT smitsljh minimallyinvasiveperinealredosurgeryforrectovesicalandrectovaginalfistulaeacaseseries
AT kustersm minimallyinvasiveperinealredosurgeryforrectovesicalandrectovaginalfistulaeacaseseries
AT ozerm minimallyinvasiveperinealredosurgeryforrectovesicalandrectovaginalfistulaeacaseseries
AT nieuwenhuijzenja minimallyinvasiveperinealredosurgeryforrectovesicalandrectovaginalfistulaeacaseseries
AT tuynmanjb minimallyinvasiveperinealredosurgeryforrectovesicalandrectovaginalfistulaeacaseseries