Cargando…
Minimally invasive perineal redo surgery for rectovesical and rectovaginal fistulae: A case series
INTRODUCTION: Iatrogenic recto-urogenital fistulae are refractory complications that rarely heal without surgical intervention. The ongoing local infection causes pain, discomfort and substantially impacts quality of life. Surgical repair requires adequate exposure and space to fill with healthy tis...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7724097/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33395885 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijscr.2020.11.067 |
_version_ | 1783620478598905856 |
---|---|
author | Grüter, A.A.J. Van Oostendorp, S.E. Smits, L.J.H. Kusters, M. Özer, M. Nieuwenhuijzen, J.A. Tuynman, J.B. |
author_facet | Grüter, A.A.J. Van Oostendorp, S.E. Smits, L.J.H. Kusters, M. Özer, M. Nieuwenhuijzen, J.A. Tuynman, J.B. |
author_sort | Grüter, A.A.J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Iatrogenic recto-urogenital fistulae are refractory complications that rarely heal without surgical intervention. The ongoing local infection causes pain, discomfort and substantially impacts quality of life. Surgical repair requires adequate exposure and space to fill with healthy tissue, which is a major challenge in pelvic redo surgery. An abdominal approach to repair the fistula is associated with major morbidity and often fails to expose the deep pelvis. In our experience a novel transperineal minimally invasive approach a utilizing single incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) technique could offer improved results. PRESENTATION OF CASES: In the present study, three cases of patients with recto-urogenital fistulae after pelvic surgery are described. Two patients were diagnosed with a rectovesical fistula and one patient with a rectovaginal fistula. In all three cases, a minimally invasive perineal approach, using a SILS port, was used to perform surgical repair. The closure of the fistulae involved: a separate repair of the urethra/bladder or vaginal defect and the rectal defect, followed by interposition of vascularized tissue by either a pudendal thigh fasciocutaneous flap or omentoplasty. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: This study is the first to report on a minimally invasive perineal approach, utilizing a SILS technique for recto-urogenital fistulae repair after previous pelvic surgery. The current approach improves exposure, creates surgical space, optimizes view and allows the interposition of vascularized tissue, without causing substantial blood loss and avoiding major abdominal surgery. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7724097 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-77240972020-12-13 Minimally invasive perineal redo surgery for rectovesical and rectovaginal fistulae: A case series Grüter, A.A.J. Van Oostendorp, S.E. Smits, L.J.H. Kusters, M. Özer, M. Nieuwenhuijzen, J.A. Tuynman, J.B. Int J Surg Case Rep Case Series INTRODUCTION: Iatrogenic recto-urogenital fistulae are refractory complications that rarely heal without surgical intervention. The ongoing local infection causes pain, discomfort and substantially impacts quality of life. Surgical repair requires adequate exposure and space to fill with healthy tissue, which is a major challenge in pelvic redo surgery. An abdominal approach to repair the fistula is associated with major morbidity and often fails to expose the deep pelvis. In our experience a novel transperineal minimally invasive approach a utilizing single incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) technique could offer improved results. PRESENTATION OF CASES: In the present study, three cases of patients with recto-urogenital fistulae after pelvic surgery are described. Two patients were diagnosed with a rectovesical fistula and one patient with a rectovaginal fistula. In all three cases, a minimally invasive perineal approach, using a SILS port, was used to perform surgical repair. The closure of the fistulae involved: a separate repair of the urethra/bladder or vaginal defect and the rectal defect, followed by interposition of vascularized tissue by either a pudendal thigh fasciocutaneous flap or omentoplasty. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: This study is the first to report on a minimally invasive perineal approach, utilizing a SILS technique for recto-urogenital fistulae repair after previous pelvic surgery. The current approach improves exposure, creates surgical space, optimizes view and allows the interposition of vascularized tissue, without causing substantial blood loss and avoiding major abdominal surgery. Elsevier 2020-11-19 /pmc/articles/PMC7724097/ /pubmed/33395885 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijscr.2020.11.067 Text en © 2020 The Author(s) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Case Series Grüter, A.A.J. Van Oostendorp, S.E. Smits, L.J.H. Kusters, M. Özer, M. Nieuwenhuijzen, J.A. Tuynman, J.B. Minimally invasive perineal redo surgery for rectovesical and rectovaginal fistulae: A case series |
title | Minimally invasive perineal redo surgery for rectovesical and rectovaginal fistulae: A case series |
title_full | Minimally invasive perineal redo surgery for rectovesical and rectovaginal fistulae: A case series |
title_fullStr | Minimally invasive perineal redo surgery for rectovesical and rectovaginal fistulae: A case series |
title_full_unstemmed | Minimally invasive perineal redo surgery for rectovesical and rectovaginal fistulae: A case series |
title_short | Minimally invasive perineal redo surgery for rectovesical and rectovaginal fistulae: A case series |
title_sort | minimally invasive perineal redo surgery for rectovesical and rectovaginal fistulae: a case series |
topic | Case Series |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7724097/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33395885 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijscr.2020.11.067 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gruteraaj minimallyinvasiveperinealredosurgeryforrectovesicalandrectovaginalfistulaeacaseseries AT vanoostendorpse minimallyinvasiveperinealredosurgeryforrectovesicalandrectovaginalfistulaeacaseseries AT smitsljh minimallyinvasiveperinealredosurgeryforrectovesicalandrectovaginalfistulaeacaseseries AT kustersm minimallyinvasiveperinealredosurgeryforrectovesicalandrectovaginalfistulaeacaseseries AT ozerm minimallyinvasiveperinealredosurgeryforrectovesicalandrectovaginalfistulaeacaseseries AT nieuwenhuijzenja minimallyinvasiveperinealredosurgeryforrectovesicalandrectovaginalfistulaeacaseseries AT tuynmanjb minimallyinvasiveperinealredosurgeryforrectovesicalandrectovaginalfistulaeacaseseries |