Cargando…

Assessment of ventricular mechanical synchronization after left bundle branch pacing using 2‐D speckle tracking echocardiography

BACKGROUND: The left bundle branch pacing (LBBP) makes the ventricular depolarization closer to the physiological state and shortens QRS duration. The purpose of this study is to explore the ventricular systolic mechanical synchronization after LBBP in comparison with traditional right ventricular p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sun, Zhijun, Di, Beibing, Gao, Huikuan, Lan, Dihui, Peng, Hui
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wiley Periodicals, Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7724215/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33085114
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/clc.23481
_version_ 1783620498562744320
author Sun, Zhijun
Di, Beibing
Gao, Huikuan
Lan, Dihui
Peng, Hui
author_facet Sun, Zhijun
Di, Beibing
Gao, Huikuan
Lan, Dihui
Peng, Hui
author_sort Sun, Zhijun
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The left bundle branch pacing (LBBP) makes the ventricular depolarization closer to the physiological state and shortens QRS duration. The purpose of this study is to explore the ventricular systolic mechanical synchronization after LBBP in comparison with traditional right ventricular pacing (RVP) using two‐dimensional strain echocardiography (2D‐STE). METHODS: Thirty‐two patients who received LBBP (n = 16) or RVP (n = 16) from October 2018 to October 2019 and met the inclusion criteria were included in this retrospective study. Electrocardiogram (ECG) characteristics, pacing parameters, pacing sites, and safety events were assessed before and after implantation. Acquisition and analysis of ventricular systolic synchronization were implemented using 2D‐STE. RESULTS: In RVP group, ECG showed left bundle branch block patterns. At LBBP, QRS morphology was in the form of right bundle branch block, and QRS durations were significantly shorter than that of the RVP QRS (109.38 ± 12.89 vs 149.38 \± 19.40 ms, P < .001). Both the maximum time differences (TD) and SDs of the 18‐segments systolic time to peak systolic strain were significantly shorter under LBBP than under RVP (TD, 66.62 ± 37.2 vs 148.62 ± 43.67 ms, P < .01; SD, 21.80 ± 12.13 vs 52.70 ± 17.72 ms, P < .01), indicating that LBBP could provide better left ventricular mechanical synchronization. Left and right ventricular pre‐ejection period difference was significantly longer in RVP group than in LBBP group (10.23 ± 3.07 vs 39.94 ± 14.81 ms, P < .05), indicating left and right ventricular contraction synchronization in LBBP group being better than in RVP group. CONCLUSION: LBBP is able to provide a physiologic ventricular activation pattern, which results in ventricular mechanical contraction synchronization.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7724215
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77242152020-12-11 Assessment of ventricular mechanical synchronization after left bundle branch pacing using 2‐D speckle tracking echocardiography Sun, Zhijun Di, Beibing Gao, Huikuan Lan, Dihui Peng, Hui Clin Cardiol Clinical Investigations BACKGROUND: The left bundle branch pacing (LBBP) makes the ventricular depolarization closer to the physiological state and shortens QRS duration. The purpose of this study is to explore the ventricular systolic mechanical synchronization after LBBP in comparison with traditional right ventricular pacing (RVP) using two‐dimensional strain echocardiography (2D‐STE). METHODS: Thirty‐two patients who received LBBP (n = 16) or RVP (n = 16) from October 2018 to October 2019 and met the inclusion criteria were included in this retrospective study. Electrocardiogram (ECG) characteristics, pacing parameters, pacing sites, and safety events were assessed before and after implantation. Acquisition and analysis of ventricular systolic synchronization were implemented using 2D‐STE. RESULTS: In RVP group, ECG showed left bundle branch block patterns. At LBBP, QRS morphology was in the form of right bundle branch block, and QRS durations were significantly shorter than that of the RVP QRS (109.38 ± 12.89 vs 149.38 \± 19.40 ms, P < .001). Both the maximum time differences (TD) and SDs of the 18‐segments systolic time to peak systolic strain were significantly shorter under LBBP than under RVP (TD, 66.62 ± 37.2 vs 148.62 ± 43.67 ms, P < .01; SD, 21.80 ± 12.13 vs 52.70 ± 17.72 ms, P < .01), indicating that LBBP could provide better left ventricular mechanical synchronization. Left and right ventricular pre‐ejection period difference was significantly longer in RVP group than in LBBP group (10.23 ± 3.07 vs 39.94 ± 14.81 ms, P < .05), indicating left and right ventricular contraction synchronization in LBBP group being better than in RVP group. CONCLUSION: LBBP is able to provide a physiologic ventricular activation pattern, which results in ventricular mechanical contraction synchronization. Wiley Periodicals, Inc. 2020-10-21 /pmc/articles/PMC7724215/ /pubmed/33085114 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/clc.23481 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Clinical Cardiology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Clinical Investigations
Sun, Zhijun
Di, Beibing
Gao, Huikuan
Lan, Dihui
Peng, Hui
Assessment of ventricular mechanical synchronization after left bundle branch pacing using 2‐D speckle tracking echocardiography
title Assessment of ventricular mechanical synchronization after left bundle branch pacing using 2‐D speckle tracking echocardiography
title_full Assessment of ventricular mechanical synchronization after left bundle branch pacing using 2‐D speckle tracking echocardiography
title_fullStr Assessment of ventricular mechanical synchronization after left bundle branch pacing using 2‐D speckle tracking echocardiography
title_full_unstemmed Assessment of ventricular mechanical synchronization after left bundle branch pacing using 2‐D speckle tracking echocardiography
title_short Assessment of ventricular mechanical synchronization after left bundle branch pacing using 2‐D speckle tracking echocardiography
title_sort assessment of ventricular mechanical synchronization after left bundle branch pacing using 2‐d speckle tracking echocardiography
topic Clinical Investigations
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7724215/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33085114
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/clc.23481
work_keys_str_mv AT sunzhijun assessmentofventricularmechanicalsynchronizationafterleftbundlebranchpacingusing2dspeckletrackingechocardiography
AT dibeibing assessmentofventricularmechanicalsynchronizationafterleftbundlebranchpacingusing2dspeckletrackingechocardiography
AT gaohuikuan assessmentofventricularmechanicalsynchronizationafterleftbundlebranchpacingusing2dspeckletrackingechocardiography
AT landihui assessmentofventricularmechanicalsynchronizationafterleftbundlebranchpacingusing2dspeckletrackingechocardiography
AT penghui assessmentofventricularmechanicalsynchronizationafterleftbundlebranchpacingusing2dspeckletrackingechocardiography