Cargando…

The prognostic value of circRNAs for gastric cancer: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

Gastric cancer is the third leading cause of cancer‐related deaths worldwide. Novel biomarkers circRNAs can play an important role in the development of gastric cancer as oncogenes or tumor suppressor genes. The purpose of this study was to clarify the relationship between the abnormal expression of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chen, Hui, Liang, Chengtong, Wang, Xuechun, Liu, Yu, Yang, Zhanjun, Shen, Ming, Han, Chongxu, Ren, Chuanli
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7724307/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33108710
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.3497
_version_ 1783620516401119232
author Chen, Hui
Liang, Chengtong
Wang, Xuechun
Liu, Yu
Yang, Zhanjun
Shen, Ming
Han, Chongxu
Ren, Chuanli
author_facet Chen, Hui
Liang, Chengtong
Wang, Xuechun
Liu, Yu
Yang, Zhanjun
Shen, Ming
Han, Chongxu
Ren, Chuanli
author_sort Chen, Hui
collection PubMed
description Gastric cancer is the third leading cause of cancer‐related deaths worldwide. Novel biomarkers circRNAs can play an important role in the development of gastric cancer as oncogenes or tumor suppressor genes. The purpose of this study was to clarify the relationship between the abnormal expression of multiple circRNAs and their prognostic value in gastric cancer patients through a meta‐analysis. We researched articles reporting the relationship between circRNAs and the prognosis of gastric cancer published in PubMed, Cochrane, Embase, Web of Science, Wanfang, CNKI, and VIP databases before 31 December 2019. Thirty‐five articles were selected for the meta‐analysis, involving 3135 gastric cancer patients. The total HR values (95% CI) of OS and DFS related to highly expressed circRNAs that indicated worse prognosis were 1.83 (1.64‐2.03; p < 0.001) and 1.66 (1.33‐2.07; p < 0.001), respectively. The total HR (95% CI) of OS and DFS related to highly expressed circRNAs that indicated better prognosis was 0.54 (0.45‐0.66; p < 0.001) and 0.58 (0.43‐0.78; p < 0.001), respectively. Two panels of five circRNAs predicted a more considerable HR value (circ_0009910, hsa_circ_0000467, hsa_circ_0065149, hsa_circ_0081143, and circDLST; and circSMARCA5, circLMTK2, hsa_circ_0001017, hsa_circ_0061276, and circ‐KIAA1244). The results of the meta‐analysis were 2.63 (2.08‐3.33; p < 0.001) and 0.39 (0.27‐0.59; p < 0.001) for OS, respectively. The two panels of dysregulated circRNAs can be considered as more suitable potential prognostic tumor biomarkers in patients with gastric cancer because of their larger HR values.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7724307
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77243072020-12-13 The prognostic value of circRNAs for gastric cancer: A systematic review and meta‐analysis Chen, Hui Liang, Chengtong Wang, Xuechun Liu, Yu Yang, Zhanjun Shen, Ming Han, Chongxu Ren, Chuanli Cancer Med Cancer Biology Gastric cancer is the third leading cause of cancer‐related deaths worldwide. Novel biomarkers circRNAs can play an important role in the development of gastric cancer as oncogenes or tumor suppressor genes. The purpose of this study was to clarify the relationship between the abnormal expression of multiple circRNAs and their prognostic value in gastric cancer patients through a meta‐analysis. We researched articles reporting the relationship between circRNAs and the prognosis of gastric cancer published in PubMed, Cochrane, Embase, Web of Science, Wanfang, CNKI, and VIP databases before 31 December 2019. Thirty‐five articles were selected for the meta‐analysis, involving 3135 gastric cancer patients. The total HR values (95% CI) of OS and DFS related to highly expressed circRNAs that indicated worse prognosis were 1.83 (1.64‐2.03; p < 0.001) and 1.66 (1.33‐2.07; p < 0.001), respectively. The total HR (95% CI) of OS and DFS related to highly expressed circRNAs that indicated better prognosis was 0.54 (0.45‐0.66; p < 0.001) and 0.58 (0.43‐0.78; p < 0.001), respectively. Two panels of five circRNAs predicted a more considerable HR value (circ_0009910, hsa_circ_0000467, hsa_circ_0065149, hsa_circ_0081143, and circDLST; and circSMARCA5, circLMTK2, hsa_circ_0001017, hsa_circ_0061276, and circ‐KIAA1244). The results of the meta‐analysis were 2.63 (2.08‐3.33; p < 0.001) and 0.39 (0.27‐0.59; p < 0.001) for OS, respectively. The two panels of dysregulated circRNAs can be considered as more suitable potential prognostic tumor biomarkers in patients with gastric cancer because of their larger HR values. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-10-27 /pmc/articles/PMC7724307/ /pubmed/33108710 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.3497 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Cancer Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Cancer Biology
Chen, Hui
Liang, Chengtong
Wang, Xuechun
Liu, Yu
Yang, Zhanjun
Shen, Ming
Han, Chongxu
Ren, Chuanli
The prognostic value of circRNAs for gastric cancer: A systematic review and meta‐analysis
title The prognostic value of circRNAs for gastric cancer: A systematic review and meta‐analysis
title_full The prognostic value of circRNAs for gastric cancer: A systematic review and meta‐analysis
title_fullStr The prognostic value of circRNAs for gastric cancer: A systematic review and meta‐analysis
title_full_unstemmed The prognostic value of circRNAs for gastric cancer: A systematic review and meta‐analysis
title_short The prognostic value of circRNAs for gastric cancer: A systematic review and meta‐analysis
title_sort prognostic value of circrnas for gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta‐analysis
topic Cancer Biology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7724307/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33108710
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.3497
work_keys_str_mv AT chenhui theprognosticvalueofcircrnasforgastriccancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT liangchengtong theprognosticvalueofcircrnasforgastriccancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT wangxuechun theprognosticvalueofcircrnasforgastriccancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT liuyu theprognosticvalueofcircrnasforgastriccancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT yangzhanjun theprognosticvalueofcircrnasforgastriccancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT shenming theprognosticvalueofcircrnasforgastriccancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT hanchongxu theprognosticvalueofcircrnasforgastriccancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT renchuanli theprognosticvalueofcircrnasforgastriccancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT chenhui prognosticvalueofcircrnasforgastriccancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT liangchengtong prognosticvalueofcircrnasforgastriccancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT wangxuechun prognosticvalueofcircrnasforgastriccancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT liuyu prognosticvalueofcircrnasforgastriccancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT yangzhanjun prognosticvalueofcircrnasforgastriccancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT shenming prognosticvalueofcircrnasforgastriccancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT hanchongxu prognosticvalueofcircrnasforgastriccancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT renchuanli prognosticvalueofcircrnasforgastriccancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis