Cargando…
The prognostic value of circRNAs for gastric cancer: A systematic review and meta‐analysis
Gastric cancer is the third leading cause of cancer‐related deaths worldwide. Novel biomarkers circRNAs can play an important role in the development of gastric cancer as oncogenes or tumor suppressor genes. The purpose of this study was to clarify the relationship between the abnormal expression of...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7724307/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33108710 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.3497 |
_version_ | 1783620516401119232 |
---|---|
author | Chen, Hui Liang, Chengtong Wang, Xuechun Liu, Yu Yang, Zhanjun Shen, Ming Han, Chongxu Ren, Chuanli |
author_facet | Chen, Hui Liang, Chengtong Wang, Xuechun Liu, Yu Yang, Zhanjun Shen, Ming Han, Chongxu Ren, Chuanli |
author_sort | Chen, Hui |
collection | PubMed |
description | Gastric cancer is the third leading cause of cancer‐related deaths worldwide. Novel biomarkers circRNAs can play an important role in the development of gastric cancer as oncogenes or tumor suppressor genes. The purpose of this study was to clarify the relationship between the abnormal expression of multiple circRNAs and their prognostic value in gastric cancer patients through a meta‐analysis. We researched articles reporting the relationship between circRNAs and the prognosis of gastric cancer published in PubMed, Cochrane, Embase, Web of Science, Wanfang, CNKI, and VIP databases before 31 December 2019. Thirty‐five articles were selected for the meta‐analysis, involving 3135 gastric cancer patients. The total HR values (95% CI) of OS and DFS related to highly expressed circRNAs that indicated worse prognosis were 1.83 (1.64‐2.03; p < 0.001) and 1.66 (1.33‐2.07; p < 0.001), respectively. The total HR (95% CI) of OS and DFS related to highly expressed circRNAs that indicated better prognosis was 0.54 (0.45‐0.66; p < 0.001) and 0.58 (0.43‐0.78; p < 0.001), respectively. Two panels of five circRNAs predicted a more considerable HR value (circ_0009910, hsa_circ_0000467, hsa_circ_0065149, hsa_circ_0081143, and circDLST; and circSMARCA5, circLMTK2, hsa_circ_0001017, hsa_circ_0061276, and circ‐KIAA1244). The results of the meta‐analysis were 2.63 (2.08‐3.33; p < 0.001) and 0.39 (0.27‐0.59; p < 0.001) for OS, respectively. The two panels of dysregulated circRNAs can be considered as more suitable potential prognostic tumor biomarkers in patients with gastric cancer because of their larger HR values. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7724307 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-77243072020-12-13 The prognostic value of circRNAs for gastric cancer: A systematic review and meta‐analysis Chen, Hui Liang, Chengtong Wang, Xuechun Liu, Yu Yang, Zhanjun Shen, Ming Han, Chongxu Ren, Chuanli Cancer Med Cancer Biology Gastric cancer is the third leading cause of cancer‐related deaths worldwide. Novel biomarkers circRNAs can play an important role in the development of gastric cancer as oncogenes or tumor suppressor genes. The purpose of this study was to clarify the relationship between the abnormal expression of multiple circRNAs and their prognostic value in gastric cancer patients through a meta‐analysis. We researched articles reporting the relationship between circRNAs and the prognosis of gastric cancer published in PubMed, Cochrane, Embase, Web of Science, Wanfang, CNKI, and VIP databases before 31 December 2019. Thirty‐five articles were selected for the meta‐analysis, involving 3135 gastric cancer patients. The total HR values (95% CI) of OS and DFS related to highly expressed circRNAs that indicated worse prognosis were 1.83 (1.64‐2.03; p < 0.001) and 1.66 (1.33‐2.07; p < 0.001), respectively. The total HR (95% CI) of OS and DFS related to highly expressed circRNAs that indicated better prognosis was 0.54 (0.45‐0.66; p < 0.001) and 0.58 (0.43‐0.78; p < 0.001), respectively. Two panels of five circRNAs predicted a more considerable HR value (circ_0009910, hsa_circ_0000467, hsa_circ_0065149, hsa_circ_0081143, and circDLST; and circSMARCA5, circLMTK2, hsa_circ_0001017, hsa_circ_0061276, and circ‐KIAA1244). The results of the meta‐analysis were 2.63 (2.08‐3.33; p < 0.001) and 0.39 (0.27‐0.59; p < 0.001) for OS, respectively. The two panels of dysregulated circRNAs can be considered as more suitable potential prognostic tumor biomarkers in patients with gastric cancer because of their larger HR values. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-10-27 /pmc/articles/PMC7724307/ /pubmed/33108710 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.3497 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Cancer Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Cancer Biology Chen, Hui Liang, Chengtong Wang, Xuechun Liu, Yu Yang, Zhanjun Shen, Ming Han, Chongxu Ren, Chuanli The prognostic value of circRNAs for gastric cancer: A systematic review and meta‐analysis |
title | The prognostic value of circRNAs for gastric cancer: A systematic review and meta‐analysis |
title_full | The prognostic value of circRNAs for gastric cancer: A systematic review and meta‐analysis |
title_fullStr | The prognostic value of circRNAs for gastric cancer: A systematic review and meta‐analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | The prognostic value of circRNAs for gastric cancer: A systematic review and meta‐analysis |
title_short | The prognostic value of circRNAs for gastric cancer: A systematic review and meta‐analysis |
title_sort | prognostic value of circrnas for gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta‐analysis |
topic | Cancer Biology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7724307/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33108710 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.3497 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chenhui theprognosticvalueofcircrnasforgastriccancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT liangchengtong theprognosticvalueofcircrnasforgastriccancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT wangxuechun theprognosticvalueofcircrnasforgastriccancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT liuyu theprognosticvalueofcircrnasforgastriccancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT yangzhanjun theprognosticvalueofcircrnasforgastriccancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT shenming theprognosticvalueofcircrnasforgastriccancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT hanchongxu theprognosticvalueofcircrnasforgastriccancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT renchuanli theprognosticvalueofcircrnasforgastriccancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT chenhui prognosticvalueofcircrnasforgastriccancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT liangchengtong prognosticvalueofcircrnasforgastriccancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT wangxuechun prognosticvalueofcircrnasforgastriccancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT liuyu prognosticvalueofcircrnasforgastriccancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT yangzhanjun prognosticvalueofcircrnasforgastriccancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT shenming prognosticvalueofcircrnasforgastriccancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT hanchongxu prognosticvalueofcircrnasforgastriccancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT renchuanli prognosticvalueofcircrnasforgastriccancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |