Cargando…

Clinical Evaluation of a COVID-19 Antibody Lateral Flow Assay using Point of Care Samples

INTRODUCTION: The ongoing SARS-CoV-2 pandemic has spurred the development of numerous point of care (PoC) immunoassays. Assessments of performance of available kits are necessary to determine their clinical utility. Previous studies have mostly performed these assessments in a laboratory setting, wh...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lee, Won, Straube, Steven, Sincic, Ryan, Noble, Jeanne A., Montoy, Juan Carlos, Kornblith, Aaron E., Prakash, Arun, Wang, Ralph, Bainton, Roland J., Kurien, Philip A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7724668/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33300003
http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/2020.12.02.20242750
_version_ 1783620570405928960
author Lee, Won
Straube, Steven
Sincic, Ryan
Noble, Jeanne A.
Montoy, Juan Carlos
Kornblith, Aaron E.
Prakash, Arun
Wang, Ralph
Bainton, Roland J.
Kurien, Philip A.
author_facet Lee, Won
Straube, Steven
Sincic, Ryan
Noble, Jeanne A.
Montoy, Juan Carlos
Kornblith, Aaron E.
Prakash, Arun
Wang, Ralph
Bainton, Roland J.
Kurien, Philip A.
author_sort Lee, Won
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The ongoing SARS-CoV-2 pandemic has spurred the development of numerous point of care (PoC) immunoassays. Assessments of performance of available kits are necessary to determine their clinical utility. Previous studies have mostly performed these assessments in a laboratory setting, which raises concerns of translating findings for PoC use. The aim of this study was to assess the performance of a lateral flow immunoassay for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies using samples collected at PoC. METHOD: One lateral flow immunoassay (Humasis(®) COVID-19 IgG/IgM) was tested. In total, 50 PCR RT-PCR positive and 52 RT-PCR negative samples were collected at PoC. Fifty serum specimens from Dec 2018 to Feb 2019 were used as controls for specificity. Serum samples collected between Dec 2019 to Feb 2020 were used as additional comparators. Clinical data including symptom onset date was collected from patient history and the medical record. RESULTS: The overall sensitivity for the kit was 74% (95% CI: 59.7% - 85.4%). The sensitivity for IgM and IgG detection >14 days after date of onset was 88% (95% CI: 68.8% - 97.5%) and 84% (95% CI: 63.9% – 95.5%), with a negative predictive value (NPV) of 94% for IgM (95% CI: 83.5% - 98.8%) and 93% for IgG (95% CI: 81.8% - 97.9%). The overall specificity was 94% (95% CI: 83.5% - 98.8%). The Immunoglobulin specific specificity was 94% for IgM (95% CI: 83.5% - 98.8%) and 98% for IgG (95% CI: 89.4% - 100.0%), with a positive predictive value (PPV) of 88% for IgM (95% CI: 68.8% - 97.5%) and 95% for IgG (95% CI: 77.2% - 99.9%) respectively for samples collected from patients >14 days after date of onset. Specimen collected during early phase of COVID-19 pandemic (Dec 2019 to Feb 2020) showed 11.8% antibody positivity, and 11.3% of PCR-negative patients demonstrated antibody positivity. DISCUSSION: Humasis(®) COVID-19 IgG/IgM LFA demonstrates greater than 90% PPV and NPV for samples collected 14 days after the onset of symptoms using samples collected at PoC. While not practical for the diagnosis of acute infection, the use of the lateral flow assays with high specificity may have utility for determining seroprevalence or seroconversion in longitudinal studies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7724668
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77246682020-12-10 Clinical Evaluation of a COVID-19 Antibody Lateral Flow Assay using Point of Care Samples Lee, Won Straube, Steven Sincic, Ryan Noble, Jeanne A. Montoy, Juan Carlos Kornblith, Aaron E. Prakash, Arun Wang, Ralph Bainton, Roland J. Kurien, Philip A. medRxiv Article INTRODUCTION: The ongoing SARS-CoV-2 pandemic has spurred the development of numerous point of care (PoC) immunoassays. Assessments of performance of available kits are necessary to determine their clinical utility. Previous studies have mostly performed these assessments in a laboratory setting, which raises concerns of translating findings for PoC use. The aim of this study was to assess the performance of a lateral flow immunoassay for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies using samples collected at PoC. METHOD: One lateral flow immunoassay (Humasis(®) COVID-19 IgG/IgM) was tested. In total, 50 PCR RT-PCR positive and 52 RT-PCR negative samples were collected at PoC. Fifty serum specimens from Dec 2018 to Feb 2019 were used as controls for specificity. Serum samples collected between Dec 2019 to Feb 2020 were used as additional comparators. Clinical data including symptom onset date was collected from patient history and the medical record. RESULTS: The overall sensitivity for the kit was 74% (95% CI: 59.7% - 85.4%). The sensitivity for IgM and IgG detection >14 days after date of onset was 88% (95% CI: 68.8% - 97.5%) and 84% (95% CI: 63.9% – 95.5%), with a negative predictive value (NPV) of 94% for IgM (95% CI: 83.5% - 98.8%) and 93% for IgG (95% CI: 81.8% - 97.9%). The overall specificity was 94% (95% CI: 83.5% - 98.8%). The Immunoglobulin specific specificity was 94% for IgM (95% CI: 83.5% - 98.8%) and 98% for IgG (95% CI: 89.4% - 100.0%), with a positive predictive value (PPV) of 88% for IgM (95% CI: 68.8% - 97.5%) and 95% for IgG (95% CI: 77.2% - 99.9%) respectively for samples collected from patients >14 days after date of onset. Specimen collected during early phase of COVID-19 pandemic (Dec 2019 to Feb 2020) showed 11.8% antibody positivity, and 11.3% of PCR-negative patients demonstrated antibody positivity. DISCUSSION: Humasis(®) COVID-19 IgG/IgM LFA demonstrates greater than 90% PPV and NPV for samples collected 14 days after the onset of symptoms using samples collected at PoC. While not practical for the diagnosis of acute infection, the use of the lateral flow assays with high specificity may have utility for determining seroprevalence or seroconversion in longitudinal studies. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory 2020-12-04 /pmc/articles/PMC7724668/ /pubmed/33300003 http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/2020.12.02.20242750 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/) , which allows reusers to copy and distribute the material in any medium or format in unadapted form only, and only so long as attribution is given to the creator. The license allows for commercial use.
spellingShingle Article
Lee, Won
Straube, Steven
Sincic, Ryan
Noble, Jeanne A.
Montoy, Juan Carlos
Kornblith, Aaron E.
Prakash, Arun
Wang, Ralph
Bainton, Roland J.
Kurien, Philip A.
Clinical Evaluation of a COVID-19 Antibody Lateral Flow Assay using Point of Care Samples
title Clinical Evaluation of a COVID-19 Antibody Lateral Flow Assay using Point of Care Samples
title_full Clinical Evaluation of a COVID-19 Antibody Lateral Flow Assay using Point of Care Samples
title_fullStr Clinical Evaluation of a COVID-19 Antibody Lateral Flow Assay using Point of Care Samples
title_full_unstemmed Clinical Evaluation of a COVID-19 Antibody Lateral Flow Assay using Point of Care Samples
title_short Clinical Evaluation of a COVID-19 Antibody Lateral Flow Assay using Point of Care Samples
title_sort clinical evaluation of a covid-19 antibody lateral flow assay using point of care samples
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7724668/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33300003
http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/2020.12.02.20242750
work_keys_str_mv AT leewon clinicalevaluationofacovid19antibodylateralflowassayusingpointofcaresamples
AT straubesteven clinicalevaluationofacovid19antibodylateralflowassayusingpointofcaresamples
AT sincicryan clinicalevaluationofacovid19antibodylateralflowassayusingpointofcaresamples
AT noblejeannea clinicalevaluationofacovid19antibodylateralflowassayusingpointofcaresamples
AT montoyjuancarlos clinicalevaluationofacovid19antibodylateralflowassayusingpointofcaresamples
AT kornblithaarone clinicalevaluationofacovid19antibodylateralflowassayusingpointofcaresamples
AT prakasharun clinicalevaluationofacovid19antibodylateralflowassayusingpointofcaresamples
AT wangralph clinicalevaluationofacovid19antibodylateralflowassayusingpointofcaresamples
AT baintonrolandj clinicalevaluationofacovid19antibodylateralflowassayusingpointofcaresamples
AT kurienphilipa clinicalevaluationofacovid19antibodylateralflowassayusingpointofcaresamples