Cargando…

Impact of social distancing regulations and epidemic risk perception on social contact and SARS-CoV-2 transmission potential in rural South Africa: analysis of repeated cross-sectional surveys

BACKGROUND: South Africa implemented rapid and strict physical distancing regulations to minimize SARS-CoV-2 epidemic spread. Evidence on the impact of such measures on interpersonal contact in rural and lower-income settings is limited. METHODS: We compared population-representative social contact...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: McCreesh, Nicky, Dlamini, Vuyiswa, Edwards, Anita, Olivier, Stephen, Dayi, Njabulo, Dikgale, Keabetswe, Nxumalo, Siyabonga, Dreyer, Jaco, Baisley, Kathy, Siedner, Mark J., White, Richard G., Herbst, Kobus, Grant, Alison D., Harling, Guy
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7724677/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33300009
http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/2020.12.01.20241877
_version_ 1783620571341258752
author McCreesh, Nicky
Dlamini, Vuyiswa
Edwards, Anita
Olivier, Stephen
Dayi, Njabulo
Dikgale, Keabetswe
Nxumalo, Siyabonga
Dreyer, Jaco
Baisley, Kathy
Siedner, Mark J.
White, Richard G.
Herbst, Kobus
Grant, Alison D.
Harling, Guy
author_facet McCreesh, Nicky
Dlamini, Vuyiswa
Edwards, Anita
Olivier, Stephen
Dayi, Njabulo
Dikgale, Keabetswe
Nxumalo, Siyabonga
Dreyer, Jaco
Baisley, Kathy
Siedner, Mark J.
White, Richard G.
Herbst, Kobus
Grant, Alison D.
Harling, Guy
author_sort McCreesh, Nicky
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: South Africa implemented rapid and strict physical distancing regulations to minimize SARS-CoV-2 epidemic spread. Evidence on the impact of such measures on interpersonal contact in rural and lower-income settings is limited. METHODS: We compared population-representative social contact surveys conducted in the same rural KwaZulu-Natal location once in 2019 and twice in mid-2020. Respondents reported characteristics of physical and conversational (‘close interaction’) contacts over 24 hours. We built age-mixing matrices and estimated the proportional change in the SARS-CoV-2 reproduction number (R(0)). Respondents also reported counts of others present at locations visited and transport used, from which we evaluated change in potential exposure to airborne infection due to shared indoor space (‘shared air’). RESULTS: Respondents in March-December 2019 (n=1704) reported a mean of 7.4 close interaction contacts and 196 shared air person-hours beyond their homes. Respondents in June-July 2020 (n=216), as the epidemic peaked locally, reported 4.1 close interaction contacts and 21 shared air person-hours outside their home, with significant declines in others’ homes and public spaces. Adults aged over 50 had fewer close contacts with others over 50, but little change in contact with 15–29 year olds, reflecting ongoing contact within multigenerational households. We estimate potential R(0) fell by 42% (95% plausible range 14–59%) between 2019 and June-July 2020. DISCUSSION: Extra-household social contact fell substantially following imposition of Covid-19 distancing regulations in rural South Africa. Ongoing contact within intergenerational households highlighted the limitation of social distancing measures in protecting older adults. FUNDING: Wellcome Trust, UKRI, DFID, European Union
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7724677
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77246772020-12-10 Impact of social distancing regulations and epidemic risk perception on social contact and SARS-CoV-2 transmission potential in rural South Africa: analysis of repeated cross-sectional surveys McCreesh, Nicky Dlamini, Vuyiswa Edwards, Anita Olivier, Stephen Dayi, Njabulo Dikgale, Keabetswe Nxumalo, Siyabonga Dreyer, Jaco Baisley, Kathy Siedner, Mark J. White, Richard G. Herbst, Kobus Grant, Alison D. Harling, Guy medRxiv Article BACKGROUND: South Africa implemented rapid and strict physical distancing regulations to minimize SARS-CoV-2 epidemic spread. Evidence on the impact of such measures on interpersonal contact in rural and lower-income settings is limited. METHODS: We compared population-representative social contact surveys conducted in the same rural KwaZulu-Natal location once in 2019 and twice in mid-2020. Respondents reported characteristics of physical and conversational (‘close interaction’) contacts over 24 hours. We built age-mixing matrices and estimated the proportional change in the SARS-CoV-2 reproduction number (R(0)). Respondents also reported counts of others present at locations visited and transport used, from which we evaluated change in potential exposure to airborne infection due to shared indoor space (‘shared air’). RESULTS: Respondents in March-December 2019 (n=1704) reported a mean of 7.4 close interaction contacts and 196 shared air person-hours beyond their homes. Respondents in June-July 2020 (n=216), as the epidemic peaked locally, reported 4.1 close interaction contacts and 21 shared air person-hours outside their home, with significant declines in others’ homes and public spaces. Adults aged over 50 had fewer close contacts with others over 50, but little change in contact with 15–29 year olds, reflecting ongoing contact within multigenerational households. We estimate potential R(0) fell by 42% (95% plausible range 14–59%) between 2019 and June-July 2020. DISCUSSION: Extra-household social contact fell substantially following imposition of Covid-19 distancing regulations in rural South Africa. Ongoing contact within intergenerational households highlighted the limitation of social distancing measures in protecting older adults. FUNDING: Wellcome Trust, UKRI, DFID, European Union Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory 2020-12-03 /pmc/articles/PMC7724677/ /pubmed/33300009 http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/2020.12.01.20241877 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , which allows reusers to copy and distribute the material in any medium or format in unadapted form only, for noncommercial purposes only, and only so long as attribution is given to the creator.
spellingShingle Article
McCreesh, Nicky
Dlamini, Vuyiswa
Edwards, Anita
Olivier, Stephen
Dayi, Njabulo
Dikgale, Keabetswe
Nxumalo, Siyabonga
Dreyer, Jaco
Baisley, Kathy
Siedner, Mark J.
White, Richard G.
Herbst, Kobus
Grant, Alison D.
Harling, Guy
Impact of social distancing regulations and epidemic risk perception on social contact and SARS-CoV-2 transmission potential in rural South Africa: analysis of repeated cross-sectional surveys
title Impact of social distancing regulations and epidemic risk perception on social contact and SARS-CoV-2 transmission potential in rural South Africa: analysis of repeated cross-sectional surveys
title_full Impact of social distancing regulations and epidemic risk perception on social contact and SARS-CoV-2 transmission potential in rural South Africa: analysis of repeated cross-sectional surveys
title_fullStr Impact of social distancing regulations and epidemic risk perception on social contact and SARS-CoV-2 transmission potential in rural South Africa: analysis of repeated cross-sectional surveys
title_full_unstemmed Impact of social distancing regulations and epidemic risk perception on social contact and SARS-CoV-2 transmission potential in rural South Africa: analysis of repeated cross-sectional surveys
title_short Impact of social distancing regulations and epidemic risk perception on social contact and SARS-CoV-2 transmission potential in rural South Africa: analysis of repeated cross-sectional surveys
title_sort impact of social distancing regulations and epidemic risk perception on social contact and sars-cov-2 transmission potential in rural south africa: analysis of repeated cross-sectional surveys
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7724677/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33300009
http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/2020.12.01.20241877
work_keys_str_mv AT mccreeshnicky impactofsocialdistancingregulationsandepidemicriskperceptiononsocialcontactandsarscov2transmissionpotentialinruralsouthafricaanalysisofrepeatedcrosssectionalsurveys
AT dlaminivuyiswa impactofsocialdistancingregulationsandepidemicriskperceptiononsocialcontactandsarscov2transmissionpotentialinruralsouthafricaanalysisofrepeatedcrosssectionalsurveys
AT edwardsanita impactofsocialdistancingregulationsandepidemicriskperceptiononsocialcontactandsarscov2transmissionpotentialinruralsouthafricaanalysisofrepeatedcrosssectionalsurveys
AT olivierstephen impactofsocialdistancingregulationsandepidemicriskperceptiononsocialcontactandsarscov2transmissionpotentialinruralsouthafricaanalysisofrepeatedcrosssectionalsurveys
AT dayinjabulo impactofsocialdistancingregulationsandepidemicriskperceptiononsocialcontactandsarscov2transmissionpotentialinruralsouthafricaanalysisofrepeatedcrosssectionalsurveys
AT dikgalekeabetswe impactofsocialdistancingregulationsandepidemicriskperceptiononsocialcontactandsarscov2transmissionpotentialinruralsouthafricaanalysisofrepeatedcrosssectionalsurveys
AT nxumalosiyabonga impactofsocialdistancingregulationsandepidemicriskperceptiononsocialcontactandsarscov2transmissionpotentialinruralsouthafricaanalysisofrepeatedcrosssectionalsurveys
AT dreyerjaco impactofsocialdistancingregulationsandepidemicriskperceptiononsocialcontactandsarscov2transmissionpotentialinruralsouthafricaanalysisofrepeatedcrosssectionalsurveys
AT baisleykathy impactofsocialdistancingregulationsandepidemicriskperceptiononsocialcontactandsarscov2transmissionpotentialinruralsouthafricaanalysisofrepeatedcrosssectionalsurveys
AT siednermarkj impactofsocialdistancingregulationsandepidemicriskperceptiononsocialcontactandsarscov2transmissionpotentialinruralsouthafricaanalysisofrepeatedcrosssectionalsurveys
AT whiterichardg impactofsocialdistancingregulationsandepidemicriskperceptiononsocialcontactandsarscov2transmissionpotentialinruralsouthafricaanalysisofrepeatedcrosssectionalsurveys
AT herbstkobus impactofsocialdistancingregulationsandepidemicriskperceptiononsocialcontactandsarscov2transmissionpotentialinruralsouthafricaanalysisofrepeatedcrosssectionalsurveys
AT grantalisond impactofsocialdistancingregulationsandepidemicriskperceptiononsocialcontactandsarscov2transmissionpotentialinruralsouthafricaanalysisofrepeatedcrosssectionalsurveys
AT harlingguy impactofsocialdistancingregulationsandepidemicriskperceptiononsocialcontactandsarscov2transmissionpotentialinruralsouthafricaanalysisofrepeatedcrosssectionalsurveys