Cargando…

Doppler ultrasound cardiac gating of intracranial flow at 7T

BACKGROUND: Ultra-high field magnetic resonance imaging (MR) may be used to improve intracranial blood flow measurements. However, standard cardiac synchronization methods tend to fail at ultra-high field MR. Therefore, this study aims to investigate an alternative synchronization technique using Do...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Markenroth Bloch, Karin, Kording, Fabian, Töger, Johannes
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7724705/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33297985
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12880-020-00523-x
_version_ 1783620576382812160
author Markenroth Bloch, Karin
Kording, Fabian
Töger, Johannes
author_facet Markenroth Bloch, Karin
Kording, Fabian
Töger, Johannes
author_sort Markenroth Bloch, Karin
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Ultra-high field magnetic resonance imaging (MR) may be used to improve intracranial blood flow measurements. However, standard cardiac synchronization methods tend to fail at ultra-high field MR. Therefore, this study aims to investigate an alternative synchronization technique using Doppler ultrasound. METHODS: Healthy subjects (n = 9) were examined with 7T MR. Flow was measured in the M1-branch of the middle cerebral artery (MCA) and in the cerebral aqueduct (CA) using through-plane phase contrast (2D flow). Flow in the circle of Willis was measured with three-dimensional, three-directional phase contrast (4D flow). Scans were gated with Doppler ultrasound (DUS) and electrocardiogram (ECG), and pulse oximetry data (POX) was collected simultaneously. False negative and false positive trigger events were counted for ECG, DUS and POX, and quantitative flow measures were compared. RESULTS: There were fewer false positive triggers for DUS compared to ECG (5.3 ± 11 vs. 25 ± 31, p = 0.031), while no other measured parameters differed significantly. Net blood flow in M1 was similar between DUS and ECG for 2D flow (1.5 ± 0.39 vs. 1.6 ± 0.41, bias ± 1.96SD: − 0.021 ± 0.36) and 4D flow (1.8 ± 0.48 vs. 9 ± 0.59, bias ± 1.96SD: − 0.086 ± 0.57 ml). Net CSF flow per heart beat in the CA was also similar for DUS and ECG (3.6 ± 2.1 vs. 3.0 ± 5.8, bias ± 1.96SD: 0.61 ± 13.6 μl). CONCLUSION: Gating with DUS produced fewer false trigger events than using ECG, with similar quantitative flow values. DUS gating is a promising technique for cardiac synchronization at 7T.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7724705
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77247052020-12-09 Doppler ultrasound cardiac gating of intracranial flow at 7T Markenroth Bloch, Karin Kording, Fabian Töger, Johannes BMC Med Imaging Technical Advance BACKGROUND: Ultra-high field magnetic resonance imaging (MR) may be used to improve intracranial blood flow measurements. However, standard cardiac synchronization methods tend to fail at ultra-high field MR. Therefore, this study aims to investigate an alternative synchronization technique using Doppler ultrasound. METHODS: Healthy subjects (n = 9) were examined with 7T MR. Flow was measured in the M1-branch of the middle cerebral artery (MCA) and in the cerebral aqueduct (CA) using through-plane phase contrast (2D flow). Flow in the circle of Willis was measured with three-dimensional, three-directional phase contrast (4D flow). Scans were gated with Doppler ultrasound (DUS) and electrocardiogram (ECG), and pulse oximetry data (POX) was collected simultaneously. False negative and false positive trigger events were counted for ECG, DUS and POX, and quantitative flow measures were compared. RESULTS: There were fewer false positive triggers for DUS compared to ECG (5.3 ± 11 vs. 25 ± 31, p = 0.031), while no other measured parameters differed significantly. Net blood flow in M1 was similar between DUS and ECG for 2D flow (1.5 ± 0.39 vs. 1.6 ± 0.41, bias ± 1.96SD: − 0.021 ± 0.36) and 4D flow (1.8 ± 0.48 vs. 9 ± 0.59, bias ± 1.96SD: − 0.086 ± 0.57 ml). Net CSF flow per heart beat in the CA was also similar for DUS and ECG (3.6 ± 2.1 vs. 3.0 ± 5.8, bias ± 1.96SD: 0.61 ± 13.6 μl). CONCLUSION: Gating with DUS produced fewer false trigger events than using ECG, with similar quantitative flow values. DUS gating is a promising technique for cardiac synchronization at 7T. BioMed Central 2020-12-09 /pmc/articles/PMC7724705/ /pubmed/33297985 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12880-020-00523-x Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Technical Advance
Markenroth Bloch, Karin
Kording, Fabian
Töger, Johannes
Doppler ultrasound cardiac gating of intracranial flow at 7T
title Doppler ultrasound cardiac gating of intracranial flow at 7T
title_full Doppler ultrasound cardiac gating of intracranial flow at 7T
title_fullStr Doppler ultrasound cardiac gating of intracranial flow at 7T
title_full_unstemmed Doppler ultrasound cardiac gating of intracranial flow at 7T
title_short Doppler ultrasound cardiac gating of intracranial flow at 7T
title_sort doppler ultrasound cardiac gating of intracranial flow at 7t
topic Technical Advance
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7724705/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33297985
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12880-020-00523-x
work_keys_str_mv AT markenrothblochkarin dopplerultrasoundcardiacgatingofintracranialflowat7t
AT kordingfabian dopplerultrasoundcardiacgatingofintracranialflowat7t
AT togerjohannes dopplerultrasoundcardiacgatingofintracranialflowat7t