Cargando…

Geometric accuracy of an acrylonitrile butadiene styrene canine tibia model fabricated using fused deposition modelling and the effects of hydrogen peroxide gas plasma sterilisation

BACKGROUND: Three-dimensional (3D) printing techniques have been used to produce anatomical models and surgical guiding instruments in orthopaedic surgery. The geometric accuracy of the 3D printed replica may affect surgical planning. This study assessed the geometric accuracy of an acrylonitrile bu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hsu, Chi-Pin, Lin, Chen-Si, Fan, Chun-Hao, Chiang, Nai-Yuan, Tsai, Ching-Wen, Chang, Chun-Ming, Liu, I-Li
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7724725/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33298063
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12917-020-02691-y
_version_ 1783620580937826304
author Hsu, Chi-Pin
Lin, Chen-Si
Fan, Chun-Hao
Chiang, Nai-Yuan
Tsai, Ching-Wen
Chang, Chun-Ming
Liu, I-Li
author_facet Hsu, Chi-Pin
Lin, Chen-Si
Fan, Chun-Hao
Chiang, Nai-Yuan
Tsai, Ching-Wen
Chang, Chun-Ming
Liu, I-Li
author_sort Hsu, Chi-Pin
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Three-dimensional (3D) printing techniques have been used to produce anatomical models and surgical guiding instruments in orthopaedic surgery. The geometric accuracy of the 3D printed replica may affect surgical planning. This study assessed the geometric accuracy of an acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS) canine tibia model printed using fused deposition modelling (FDM) and evaluated its morphological change after hydrogen peroxide (H(2)O(2)) gas plasma sterilisation. The tibias of six canine cadavers underwent computed tomography for 3D reconstruction. Tibia models were fabricated from ABS on a 3D printer through FDM. Reverse-engineering technology was used to compare morphological errors (root mean square; RMS) between the 3D-FDM models and virtual models segmented from original tibia images (3D-CT) and between the models sterilised with H(2)O(2) gas plasma (3D-GAS) and 3D-FDM models on tibia surface and in cross-sections at: 5, 15, 25, 50, 75, 85, and 95% of the tibia length. RESULTS: The RMS mean ± standard deviation and average positive and negative deviation values for all specimens in E(FDM-CT) (3D-FDM vs. 3D-CT) were significantly higher than those in E(GAS-FDM) (3D-GAS vs. 3D-FDM; P < 0.0001). Mean RMS values for E(FDM-CT) at 5% bone length (proximal tibia) were significantly higher than those at the other six cross-sections (P < 0.0001). Mean RMS differences for E(GAS-FDM) at all seven cross-sections were nonsignificant. CONCLUSIONS: The tibia models fabricated on an FDM printer had high geometric accuracy with a low RMS value. The surface deviation in E(FDM-CT) indicated that larger errors occurred during manufacturing than during sterilisation. Therefore, the model may be used for surgical rehearsal and further clinically relevant applications in bone surgery. GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT: [Image: see text]
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7724725
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77247252020-12-09 Geometric accuracy of an acrylonitrile butadiene styrene canine tibia model fabricated using fused deposition modelling and the effects of hydrogen peroxide gas plasma sterilisation Hsu, Chi-Pin Lin, Chen-Si Fan, Chun-Hao Chiang, Nai-Yuan Tsai, Ching-Wen Chang, Chun-Ming Liu, I-Li BMC Vet Res Research Article BACKGROUND: Three-dimensional (3D) printing techniques have been used to produce anatomical models and surgical guiding instruments in orthopaedic surgery. The geometric accuracy of the 3D printed replica may affect surgical planning. This study assessed the geometric accuracy of an acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS) canine tibia model printed using fused deposition modelling (FDM) and evaluated its morphological change after hydrogen peroxide (H(2)O(2)) gas plasma sterilisation. The tibias of six canine cadavers underwent computed tomography for 3D reconstruction. Tibia models were fabricated from ABS on a 3D printer through FDM. Reverse-engineering technology was used to compare morphological errors (root mean square; RMS) between the 3D-FDM models and virtual models segmented from original tibia images (3D-CT) and between the models sterilised with H(2)O(2) gas plasma (3D-GAS) and 3D-FDM models on tibia surface and in cross-sections at: 5, 15, 25, 50, 75, 85, and 95% of the tibia length. RESULTS: The RMS mean ± standard deviation and average positive and negative deviation values for all specimens in E(FDM-CT) (3D-FDM vs. 3D-CT) were significantly higher than those in E(GAS-FDM) (3D-GAS vs. 3D-FDM; P < 0.0001). Mean RMS values for E(FDM-CT) at 5% bone length (proximal tibia) were significantly higher than those at the other six cross-sections (P < 0.0001). Mean RMS differences for E(GAS-FDM) at all seven cross-sections were nonsignificant. CONCLUSIONS: The tibia models fabricated on an FDM printer had high geometric accuracy with a low RMS value. The surface deviation in E(FDM-CT) indicated that larger errors occurred during manufacturing than during sterilisation. Therefore, the model may be used for surgical rehearsal and further clinically relevant applications in bone surgery. GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT: [Image: see text] BioMed Central 2020-12-09 /pmc/articles/PMC7724725/ /pubmed/33298063 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12917-020-02691-y Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Hsu, Chi-Pin
Lin, Chen-Si
Fan, Chun-Hao
Chiang, Nai-Yuan
Tsai, Ching-Wen
Chang, Chun-Ming
Liu, I-Li
Geometric accuracy of an acrylonitrile butadiene styrene canine tibia model fabricated using fused deposition modelling and the effects of hydrogen peroxide gas plasma sterilisation
title Geometric accuracy of an acrylonitrile butadiene styrene canine tibia model fabricated using fused deposition modelling and the effects of hydrogen peroxide gas plasma sterilisation
title_full Geometric accuracy of an acrylonitrile butadiene styrene canine tibia model fabricated using fused deposition modelling and the effects of hydrogen peroxide gas plasma sterilisation
title_fullStr Geometric accuracy of an acrylonitrile butadiene styrene canine tibia model fabricated using fused deposition modelling and the effects of hydrogen peroxide gas plasma sterilisation
title_full_unstemmed Geometric accuracy of an acrylonitrile butadiene styrene canine tibia model fabricated using fused deposition modelling and the effects of hydrogen peroxide gas plasma sterilisation
title_short Geometric accuracy of an acrylonitrile butadiene styrene canine tibia model fabricated using fused deposition modelling and the effects of hydrogen peroxide gas plasma sterilisation
title_sort geometric accuracy of an acrylonitrile butadiene styrene canine tibia model fabricated using fused deposition modelling and the effects of hydrogen peroxide gas plasma sterilisation
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7724725/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33298063
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12917-020-02691-y
work_keys_str_mv AT hsuchipin geometricaccuracyofanacrylonitrilebutadienestyrenecaninetibiamodelfabricatedusingfuseddepositionmodellingandtheeffectsofhydrogenperoxidegasplasmasterilisation
AT linchensi geometricaccuracyofanacrylonitrilebutadienestyrenecaninetibiamodelfabricatedusingfuseddepositionmodellingandtheeffectsofhydrogenperoxidegasplasmasterilisation
AT fanchunhao geometricaccuracyofanacrylonitrilebutadienestyrenecaninetibiamodelfabricatedusingfuseddepositionmodellingandtheeffectsofhydrogenperoxidegasplasmasterilisation
AT chiangnaiyuan geometricaccuracyofanacrylonitrilebutadienestyrenecaninetibiamodelfabricatedusingfuseddepositionmodellingandtheeffectsofhydrogenperoxidegasplasmasterilisation
AT tsaichingwen geometricaccuracyofanacrylonitrilebutadienestyrenecaninetibiamodelfabricatedusingfuseddepositionmodellingandtheeffectsofhydrogenperoxidegasplasmasterilisation
AT changchunming geometricaccuracyofanacrylonitrilebutadienestyrenecaninetibiamodelfabricatedusingfuseddepositionmodellingandtheeffectsofhydrogenperoxidegasplasmasterilisation
AT liuili geometricaccuracyofanacrylonitrilebutadienestyrenecaninetibiamodelfabricatedusingfuseddepositionmodellingandtheeffectsofhydrogenperoxidegasplasmasterilisation