Cargando…
Lower Extremity Marjolin’s Ulcer Reconstruction With Free Anterolateral Thigh Flap: A Case Series of 11 Patients
Background Marjolin’s ulcer (MU) of lower extremities usually presents with scar contracture and functional disability. They often follow an aggressive course and poor outcome, and require early radical removal. Split-thickness skin grafts, local flaps, or amputation are commonly practiced surgical...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Cureus
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7725200/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33312791 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.11392 |
Sumario: | Background Marjolin’s ulcer (MU) of lower extremities usually presents with scar contracture and functional disability. They often follow an aggressive course and poor outcome, and require early radical removal. Split-thickness skin grafts, local flaps, or amputation are commonly practiced surgical options for MU. Though free flaps are gaining popularity for various oncoplastic reconstruction, they are not frequently used for MU. A free anterolateral thigh (ALT) flap may have a beneficial role as it provides simultaneous coverage for a large defect after radical tumor and scar excision. Methods Between January 2015 and December 2018, 11 patients with lower limb MU reconstructed with free ALT flap were reviewed retrospectively for the surgical procedure, recurrences, and functional outcomes. Results Mean dimensions of the defect and flaps were 8 cm × 6 cm and 18.91 cm × 11 cm, respectively, and total flap coverage was obtained in nine cases. Marginal flap loss was noted in one and residual contracture in two cases. Functional improvement of the limb was achieved in all cases. Recurrence or disease-related mortality was not seen in any patient after a mean follow-up of 35.82 months. Conclusions Free ALT flap reconstruction of MU of extremity facilitates most radical tumor and scar-contracture removal and thus reduces the chances of re-ulceration. It facilitates local radiotherapy protocol with the provision of immediate durable coverage. Thus, it has a beneficial role other than a secondary reconstructive procedure. Moreover, an added benefit may be obtained with a “flow-through’ flap” to avoid amputation and improve functional outcomes. |
---|