Cargando…
Ensuring the quality and specificity of preregistrations
Researchers face many, often seemingly arbitrary, choices in formulating hypotheses, designing protocols, collecting data, analyzing data, and reporting results. Opportunistic use of “researcher degrees of freedom” aimed at obtaining statistical significance increases the likelihood of obtaining and...
Autores principales: | Bakker, Marjan, Veldkamp, Coosje L. S., van Assen, Marcel A. L. M., Crompvoets, Elise A. V., Ong, How Hwee, Nosek, Brian A., Soderberg, Courtney K., Mellor, David, Wicherts, Jelte M. |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7725296/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33296358 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000937 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Recommendations in pre-registrations and internal review board proposals promote formal power analyses but do not increase sample size
por: Bakker, Marjan, et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
Degrees of Freedom in Planning, Running, Analyzing, and Reporting Psychological Studies: A Checklist to Avoid p-Hacking
por: Wicherts, Jelte M., et al.
Publicado: (2016) -
Who Believes in the Storybook Image of the Scientist?
por: Veldkamp, Coosje L. S., et al.
Publicado: (2017) -
Statistical Reporting Errors and Collaboration on Statistical Analyses in Psychological Science
por: Veldkamp, Coosje L. S., et al.
Publicado: (2014) -
Effect Sizes, Power, and Biases in Intelligence Research: A Meta-Meta-Analysis
por: Nuijten, Michèle B., et al.
Publicado: (2020)