Cargando…

Towards the Anaerobic Production of Surfactin Using Bacillus subtilis

The anaerobic growth of B. subtilis to synthesize surfactin poses an alternative strategy to conventional aerobic cultivations. In general, the strong foam formation observed during aerobic processes represents a major obstacle. Anaerobic processes have, amongst others, the distinct advantage that t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hoffmann, Mareen, Fernandez Cano Luna, Diana Stephanie, Xiao, Shengbin, Stegemüller, Lars, Rief, Katharina, Heravi, Kambiz Morabbi, Lilge, Lars, Henkel, Marius, Hausmann, Rudolf
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7726195/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33324620
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2020.554903
_version_ 1783620830101504000
author Hoffmann, Mareen
Fernandez Cano Luna, Diana Stephanie
Xiao, Shengbin
Stegemüller, Lars
Rief, Katharina
Heravi, Kambiz Morabbi
Lilge, Lars
Henkel, Marius
Hausmann, Rudolf
author_facet Hoffmann, Mareen
Fernandez Cano Luna, Diana Stephanie
Xiao, Shengbin
Stegemüller, Lars
Rief, Katharina
Heravi, Kambiz Morabbi
Lilge, Lars
Henkel, Marius
Hausmann, Rudolf
author_sort Hoffmann, Mareen
collection PubMed
description The anaerobic growth of B. subtilis to synthesize surfactin poses an alternative strategy to conventional aerobic cultivations. In general, the strong foam formation observed during aerobic processes represents a major obstacle. Anaerobic processes have, amongst others, the distinct advantage that the total bioreactor volume can be exploited as foaming does not occur. Recent studies also reported on promising product per biomass yields. However, anaerobic growth in comparison to aerobic processes has several disadvantages. For example, the overall titers are comparably low and cultivations are time-consuming due to low growth rates. B. subtilis JABs24, a derivate of strain 168 with the ability to synthesize surfactin, was used as model strain in this study. Ammonium and nitrite were hypothesized to negatively influence anaerobic growth. Ammonium with initial concentrations up to 0.2 mol/L was shown to have no significant impact on growth, but increasing concentrations resulted in decreased surfactin titers and reduced nitrate reductase expression. Anaerobic cultivations spiked with increasing nitrite concentrations resulted in prolonged lag-phases. Indeed, growth rates were in a similar range after the lag-phase indicating that nitrite has a neglectable effect on the observed decreasing growth rates. In bioreactor cultivations, the specific growth rate decreased with increasing glucose concentrations during the time course of both batch and fed-batch processes to less than 0.05 1/h. In addition, surfactin titers, overall Y(P/X) and Y(P/S) were 53%, ∼42%, and ∼57% lower than in serum flask with 0.190 g/L, 0.344 g/g and 0.015 g/g. The Y(X/S), on the contrary, was 30% lower in the serum flask with 0.044 g/g. The productivities q were similar with ∼0.005 g/(g⋅h). However, acetate strongly accumulated during cultivation and was posed as further metabolite that might negatively influence anaerobic growth. Acetate added to anaerobic cultivations in a range from 0 g/L up to 10 g/L resulted in a reduced maximum and overall growth rate μ by 44% and 30%, respectively. To conclude, acetate was identified as a promising target for future process enhancement and strain engineering. Though, the current study demonstrates that the anaerobic cultivation to synthesize surfactin represents a reasonable perspective and feasible alternative to conventional processes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7726195
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77261952020-12-14 Towards the Anaerobic Production of Surfactin Using Bacillus subtilis Hoffmann, Mareen Fernandez Cano Luna, Diana Stephanie Xiao, Shengbin Stegemüller, Lars Rief, Katharina Heravi, Kambiz Morabbi Lilge, Lars Henkel, Marius Hausmann, Rudolf Front Bioeng Biotechnol Bioengineering and Biotechnology The anaerobic growth of B. subtilis to synthesize surfactin poses an alternative strategy to conventional aerobic cultivations. In general, the strong foam formation observed during aerobic processes represents a major obstacle. Anaerobic processes have, amongst others, the distinct advantage that the total bioreactor volume can be exploited as foaming does not occur. Recent studies also reported on promising product per biomass yields. However, anaerobic growth in comparison to aerobic processes has several disadvantages. For example, the overall titers are comparably low and cultivations are time-consuming due to low growth rates. B. subtilis JABs24, a derivate of strain 168 with the ability to synthesize surfactin, was used as model strain in this study. Ammonium and nitrite were hypothesized to negatively influence anaerobic growth. Ammonium with initial concentrations up to 0.2 mol/L was shown to have no significant impact on growth, but increasing concentrations resulted in decreased surfactin titers and reduced nitrate reductase expression. Anaerobic cultivations spiked with increasing nitrite concentrations resulted in prolonged lag-phases. Indeed, growth rates were in a similar range after the lag-phase indicating that nitrite has a neglectable effect on the observed decreasing growth rates. In bioreactor cultivations, the specific growth rate decreased with increasing glucose concentrations during the time course of both batch and fed-batch processes to less than 0.05 1/h. In addition, surfactin titers, overall Y(P/X) and Y(P/S) were 53%, ∼42%, and ∼57% lower than in serum flask with 0.190 g/L, 0.344 g/g and 0.015 g/g. The Y(X/S), on the contrary, was 30% lower in the serum flask with 0.044 g/g. The productivities q were similar with ∼0.005 g/(g⋅h). However, acetate strongly accumulated during cultivation and was posed as further metabolite that might negatively influence anaerobic growth. Acetate added to anaerobic cultivations in a range from 0 g/L up to 10 g/L resulted in a reduced maximum and overall growth rate μ by 44% and 30%, respectively. To conclude, acetate was identified as a promising target for future process enhancement and strain engineering. Though, the current study demonstrates that the anaerobic cultivation to synthesize surfactin represents a reasonable perspective and feasible alternative to conventional processes. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-11-26 /pmc/articles/PMC7726195/ /pubmed/33324620 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2020.554903 Text en Copyright © 2020 Hoffmann, Fernandez Cano Luna, Xiao, Stegemüller, Rief, Heravi, Lilge, Henkel and Hausmann. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Bioengineering and Biotechnology
Hoffmann, Mareen
Fernandez Cano Luna, Diana Stephanie
Xiao, Shengbin
Stegemüller, Lars
Rief, Katharina
Heravi, Kambiz Morabbi
Lilge, Lars
Henkel, Marius
Hausmann, Rudolf
Towards the Anaerobic Production of Surfactin Using Bacillus subtilis
title Towards the Anaerobic Production of Surfactin Using Bacillus subtilis
title_full Towards the Anaerobic Production of Surfactin Using Bacillus subtilis
title_fullStr Towards the Anaerobic Production of Surfactin Using Bacillus subtilis
title_full_unstemmed Towards the Anaerobic Production of Surfactin Using Bacillus subtilis
title_short Towards the Anaerobic Production of Surfactin Using Bacillus subtilis
title_sort towards the anaerobic production of surfactin using bacillus subtilis
topic Bioengineering and Biotechnology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7726195/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33324620
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2020.554903
work_keys_str_mv AT hoffmannmareen towardstheanaerobicproductionofsurfactinusingbacillussubtilis
AT fernandezcanolunadianastephanie towardstheanaerobicproductionofsurfactinusingbacillussubtilis
AT xiaoshengbin towardstheanaerobicproductionofsurfactinusingbacillussubtilis
AT stegemullerlars towardstheanaerobicproductionofsurfactinusingbacillussubtilis
AT riefkatharina towardstheanaerobicproductionofsurfactinusingbacillussubtilis
AT heravikambizmorabbi towardstheanaerobicproductionofsurfactinusingbacillussubtilis
AT lilgelars towardstheanaerobicproductionofsurfactinusingbacillussubtilis
AT henkelmarius towardstheanaerobicproductionofsurfactinusingbacillussubtilis
AT hausmannrudolf towardstheanaerobicproductionofsurfactinusingbacillussubtilis