Cargando…

Treatment of Rockwood Type III Acromioclavicular Joint Dislocation

While non-operative treatment with structured rehabilitation tends to be the strategy of choice in the management of Rockwood type III acromioclavicular joint injury, some advocate surgical treatment to prevent persistent pain, disability, and prominence of the distal clavicle. There is no clear con...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kim, Seong-Hun, Koh, Kyoung-Hwan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Korean Shoulder and Elbow Society 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7726372/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33330151
http://dx.doi.org/10.5397/cise.2018.21.1.48
_version_ 1783620871857897472
author Kim, Seong-Hun
Koh, Kyoung-Hwan
author_facet Kim, Seong-Hun
Koh, Kyoung-Hwan
author_sort Kim, Seong-Hun
collection PubMed
description While non-operative treatment with structured rehabilitation tends to be the strategy of choice in the management of Rockwood type III acromioclavicular joint injury, some advocate surgical treatment to prevent persistent pain, disability, and prominence of the distal clavicle. There is no clear consensus regarding when the surgical treatment should be indicated, and successful clinical outcomes have been reported for non-operative treatment in more than 80% of type III acromioclavicular joint injuries. Furthermore, there is no gold standard procedure for operative treatment of type III acromioclavicular joint injury, and more than 60 different procedures have been used for this purpose in clinical practice. Among these surgical techniques, recently introduced arthroscopic-assisted procedures involving a coracoclavicular suspension device are minimally invasive and have been shown to achieve successful coracoclavicular reconstruction in 80% of patients with failed conservative treatment. Taken together, currently available data indicate that successful treatment can be expected with initial conservative treatment in more than 96% of type III acromioclavicular injuries, whereas minimally invasive surgical treatments can be considered for unstable type IIIB injuries, especially in young and active patients. Further studies are needed to clarify the optimal treatment approach in patients with higher functional needs, especially in high-level athletes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7726372
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Korean Shoulder and Elbow Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77263722020-12-15 Treatment of Rockwood Type III Acromioclavicular Joint Dislocation Kim, Seong-Hun Koh, Kyoung-Hwan Clin Shoulder Elb Concise Review While non-operative treatment with structured rehabilitation tends to be the strategy of choice in the management of Rockwood type III acromioclavicular joint injury, some advocate surgical treatment to prevent persistent pain, disability, and prominence of the distal clavicle. There is no clear consensus regarding when the surgical treatment should be indicated, and successful clinical outcomes have been reported for non-operative treatment in more than 80% of type III acromioclavicular joint injuries. Furthermore, there is no gold standard procedure for operative treatment of type III acromioclavicular joint injury, and more than 60 different procedures have been used for this purpose in clinical practice. Among these surgical techniques, recently introduced arthroscopic-assisted procedures involving a coracoclavicular suspension device are minimally invasive and have been shown to achieve successful coracoclavicular reconstruction in 80% of patients with failed conservative treatment. Taken together, currently available data indicate that successful treatment can be expected with initial conservative treatment in more than 96% of type III acromioclavicular injuries, whereas minimally invasive surgical treatments can be considered for unstable type IIIB injuries, especially in young and active patients. Further studies are needed to clarify the optimal treatment approach in patients with higher functional needs, especially in high-level athletes. Korean Shoulder and Elbow Society 2018-03-01 /pmc/articles/PMC7726372/ /pubmed/33330151 http://dx.doi.org/10.5397/cise.2018.21.1.48 Text en Copyright © 2018 Korean Shoulder and Elbow Society This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Concise Review
Kim, Seong-Hun
Koh, Kyoung-Hwan
Treatment of Rockwood Type III Acromioclavicular Joint Dislocation
title Treatment of Rockwood Type III Acromioclavicular Joint Dislocation
title_full Treatment of Rockwood Type III Acromioclavicular Joint Dislocation
title_fullStr Treatment of Rockwood Type III Acromioclavicular Joint Dislocation
title_full_unstemmed Treatment of Rockwood Type III Acromioclavicular Joint Dislocation
title_short Treatment of Rockwood Type III Acromioclavicular Joint Dislocation
title_sort treatment of rockwood type iii acromioclavicular joint dislocation
topic Concise Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7726372/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33330151
http://dx.doi.org/10.5397/cise.2018.21.1.48
work_keys_str_mv AT kimseonghun treatmentofrockwoodtypeiiiacromioclavicularjointdislocation
AT kohkyounghwan treatmentofrockwoodtypeiiiacromioclavicularjointdislocation