Cargando…
Arthroscopic Treatment of a Type II Superior Labrum Anterior to Posterior (SLAP) Lesion Combined with a Bankart Lesion: Comparative Study between Debridement and Repair of Type II SLAP Lesion by the Status of Lesion
BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study is to evaluate results of superior labrum anterior to posterior (SLAP) repairs and debridement of type II SLAP lesions combined with Bankart lesions. METHODS: Between 2010 and 2014, total 58 patients with anterior shoulder instability due to a Bankart lesion com...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Korean Shoulder and Elbow Society
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7726375/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33330149 http://dx.doi.org/10.5397/cise.2018.21.1.37 |
_version_ | 1783620872575123456 |
---|---|
author | Lee, Sung Hyun Joo, Min Su Lim, Kyeong Hoon Kim, Jeong Woo |
author_facet | Lee, Sung Hyun Joo, Min Su Lim, Kyeong Hoon Kim, Jeong Woo |
author_sort | Lee, Sung Hyun |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study is to evaluate results of superior labrum anterior to posterior (SLAP) repairs and debridement of type II SLAP lesions combined with Bankart lesions. METHODS: Between 2010 and 2014, total 58 patients with anterior shoulder instability due to a Bankart lesion combined with a type II SLAP lesion were enrolled. Patients were divided into two groups: group C consisted of 30 patients, each with a communicated Bankart and type II SLAP lesion and group NC consisted of 28 patients, each with a non-communicated Bankart and type II SLAP lesion. Bankart repairs were performed for all patients. SLAP lesions were repaired in group C and debrided in group NC. Clinical results were analysed to compare groups C and NC by using the visual analogue scale pain score, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, Constant scores, Rowe score for instability and range of motion assessments. RESULTS: The clinical scores were improved in both groups at final follow-up. Also, there were no differences between two groups. No significant difference was found in terms of the range of motion measured at the last follow-up. The number of suture anchors used was significantly higher in group C than in group NC (5.6 vs. 3.8; p=0.021). CONCLUSIONS: In this study, it is considered that Bankart repair and SLAP debridement could be a treatment option in patients with a non-communicated type II SLAP lesion combined with a Bankart lesion (study design: IV, therapeutic study, case series). |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7726375 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Korean Shoulder and Elbow Society |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-77263752020-12-15 Arthroscopic Treatment of a Type II Superior Labrum Anterior to Posterior (SLAP) Lesion Combined with a Bankart Lesion: Comparative Study between Debridement and Repair of Type II SLAP Lesion by the Status of Lesion Lee, Sung Hyun Joo, Min Su Lim, Kyeong Hoon Kim, Jeong Woo Clin Shoulder Elb Original Article BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study is to evaluate results of superior labrum anterior to posterior (SLAP) repairs and debridement of type II SLAP lesions combined with Bankart lesions. METHODS: Between 2010 and 2014, total 58 patients with anterior shoulder instability due to a Bankart lesion combined with a type II SLAP lesion were enrolled. Patients were divided into two groups: group C consisted of 30 patients, each with a communicated Bankart and type II SLAP lesion and group NC consisted of 28 patients, each with a non-communicated Bankart and type II SLAP lesion. Bankart repairs were performed for all patients. SLAP lesions were repaired in group C and debrided in group NC. Clinical results were analysed to compare groups C and NC by using the visual analogue scale pain score, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, Constant scores, Rowe score for instability and range of motion assessments. RESULTS: The clinical scores were improved in both groups at final follow-up. Also, there were no differences between two groups. No significant difference was found in terms of the range of motion measured at the last follow-up. The number of suture anchors used was significantly higher in group C than in group NC (5.6 vs. 3.8; p=0.021). CONCLUSIONS: In this study, it is considered that Bankart repair and SLAP debridement could be a treatment option in patients with a non-communicated type II SLAP lesion combined with a Bankart lesion (study design: IV, therapeutic study, case series). Korean Shoulder and Elbow Society 2018-03-01 /pmc/articles/PMC7726375/ /pubmed/33330149 http://dx.doi.org/10.5397/cise.2018.21.1.37 Text en Copyright © 2018 Korean Shoulder and Elbow Society This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Lee, Sung Hyun Joo, Min Su Lim, Kyeong Hoon Kim, Jeong Woo Arthroscopic Treatment of a Type II Superior Labrum Anterior to Posterior (SLAP) Lesion Combined with a Bankart Lesion: Comparative Study between Debridement and Repair of Type II SLAP Lesion by the Status of Lesion |
title | Arthroscopic Treatment of a Type II Superior Labrum Anterior to Posterior (SLAP) Lesion Combined with a Bankart Lesion: Comparative Study between Debridement and Repair of Type II SLAP Lesion by the Status of Lesion |
title_full | Arthroscopic Treatment of a Type II Superior Labrum Anterior to Posterior (SLAP) Lesion Combined with a Bankart Lesion: Comparative Study between Debridement and Repair of Type II SLAP Lesion by the Status of Lesion |
title_fullStr | Arthroscopic Treatment of a Type II Superior Labrum Anterior to Posterior (SLAP) Lesion Combined with a Bankart Lesion: Comparative Study between Debridement and Repair of Type II SLAP Lesion by the Status of Lesion |
title_full_unstemmed | Arthroscopic Treatment of a Type II Superior Labrum Anterior to Posterior (SLAP) Lesion Combined with a Bankart Lesion: Comparative Study between Debridement and Repair of Type II SLAP Lesion by the Status of Lesion |
title_short | Arthroscopic Treatment of a Type II Superior Labrum Anterior to Posterior (SLAP) Lesion Combined with a Bankart Lesion: Comparative Study between Debridement and Repair of Type II SLAP Lesion by the Status of Lesion |
title_sort | arthroscopic treatment of a type ii superior labrum anterior to posterior (slap) lesion combined with a bankart lesion: comparative study between debridement and repair of type ii slap lesion by the status of lesion |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7726375/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33330149 http://dx.doi.org/10.5397/cise.2018.21.1.37 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT leesunghyun arthroscopictreatmentofatypeiisuperiorlabrumanteriortoposteriorslaplesioncombinedwithabankartlesioncomparativestudybetweendebridementandrepairoftypeiislaplesionbythestatusoflesion AT joominsu arthroscopictreatmentofatypeiisuperiorlabrumanteriortoposteriorslaplesioncombinedwithabankartlesioncomparativestudybetweendebridementandrepairoftypeiislaplesionbythestatusoflesion AT limkyeonghoon arthroscopictreatmentofatypeiisuperiorlabrumanteriortoposteriorslaplesioncombinedwithabankartlesioncomparativestudybetweendebridementandrepairoftypeiislaplesionbythestatusoflesion AT kimjeongwoo arthroscopictreatmentofatypeiisuperiorlabrumanteriortoposteriorslaplesioncombinedwithabankartlesioncomparativestudybetweendebridementandrepairoftypeiislaplesionbythestatusoflesion |