Cargando…

Arthroscopic Treatment of a Type II Superior Labrum Anterior to Posterior (SLAP) Lesion Combined with a Bankart Lesion: Comparative Study between Debridement and Repair of Type II SLAP Lesion by the Status of Lesion

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study is to evaluate results of superior labrum anterior to posterior (SLAP) repairs and debridement of type II SLAP lesions combined with Bankart lesions. METHODS: Between 2010 and 2014, total 58 patients with anterior shoulder instability due to a Bankart lesion com...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lee, Sung Hyun, Joo, Min Su, Lim, Kyeong Hoon, Kim, Jeong Woo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Korean Shoulder and Elbow Society 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7726375/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33330149
http://dx.doi.org/10.5397/cise.2018.21.1.37
_version_ 1783620872575123456
author Lee, Sung Hyun
Joo, Min Su
Lim, Kyeong Hoon
Kim, Jeong Woo
author_facet Lee, Sung Hyun
Joo, Min Su
Lim, Kyeong Hoon
Kim, Jeong Woo
author_sort Lee, Sung Hyun
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study is to evaluate results of superior labrum anterior to posterior (SLAP) repairs and debridement of type II SLAP lesions combined with Bankart lesions. METHODS: Between 2010 and 2014, total 58 patients with anterior shoulder instability due to a Bankart lesion combined with a type II SLAP lesion were enrolled. Patients were divided into two groups: group C consisted of 30 patients, each with a communicated Bankart and type II SLAP lesion and group NC consisted of 28 patients, each with a non-communicated Bankart and type II SLAP lesion. Bankart repairs were performed for all patients. SLAP lesions were repaired in group C and debrided in group NC. Clinical results were analysed to compare groups C and NC by using the visual analogue scale pain score, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, Constant scores, Rowe score for instability and range of motion assessments. RESULTS: The clinical scores were improved in both groups at final follow-up. Also, there were no differences between two groups. No significant difference was found in terms of the range of motion measured at the last follow-up. The number of suture anchors used was significantly higher in group C than in group NC (5.6 vs. 3.8; p=0.021). CONCLUSIONS: In this study, it is considered that Bankart repair and SLAP debridement could be a treatment option in patients with a non-communicated type II SLAP lesion combined with a Bankart lesion (study design: IV, therapeutic study, case series).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7726375
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Korean Shoulder and Elbow Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77263752020-12-15 Arthroscopic Treatment of a Type II Superior Labrum Anterior to Posterior (SLAP) Lesion Combined with a Bankart Lesion: Comparative Study between Debridement and Repair of Type II SLAP Lesion by the Status of Lesion Lee, Sung Hyun Joo, Min Su Lim, Kyeong Hoon Kim, Jeong Woo Clin Shoulder Elb Original Article BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study is to evaluate results of superior labrum anterior to posterior (SLAP) repairs and debridement of type II SLAP lesions combined with Bankart lesions. METHODS: Between 2010 and 2014, total 58 patients with anterior shoulder instability due to a Bankart lesion combined with a type II SLAP lesion were enrolled. Patients were divided into two groups: group C consisted of 30 patients, each with a communicated Bankart and type II SLAP lesion and group NC consisted of 28 patients, each with a non-communicated Bankart and type II SLAP lesion. Bankart repairs were performed for all patients. SLAP lesions were repaired in group C and debrided in group NC. Clinical results were analysed to compare groups C and NC by using the visual analogue scale pain score, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, Constant scores, Rowe score for instability and range of motion assessments. RESULTS: The clinical scores were improved in both groups at final follow-up. Also, there were no differences between two groups. No significant difference was found in terms of the range of motion measured at the last follow-up. The number of suture anchors used was significantly higher in group C than in group NC (5.6 vs. 3.8; p=0.021). CONCLUSIONS: In this study, it is considered that Bankart repair and SLAP debridement could be a treatment option in patients with a non-communicated type II SLAP lesion combined with a Bankart lesion (study design: IV, therapeutic study, case series). Korean Shoulder and Elbow Society 2018-03-01 /pmc/articles/PMC7726375/ /pubmed/33330149 http://dx.doi.org/10.5397/cise.2018.21.1.37 Text en Copyright © 2018 Korean Shoulder and Elbow Society This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Lee, Sung Hyun
Joo, Min Su
Lim, Kyeong Hoon
Kim, Jeong Woo
Arthroscopic Treatment of a Type II Superior Labrum Anterior to Posterior (SLAP) Lesion Combined with a Bankart Lesion: Comparative Study between Debridement and Repair of Type II SLAP Lesion by the Status of Lesion
title Arthroscopic Treatment of a Type II Superior Labrum Anterior to Posterior (SLAP) Lesion Combined with a Bankart Lesion: Comparative Study between Debridement and Repair of Type II SLAP Lesion by the Status of Lesion
title_full Arthroscopic Treatment of a Type II Superior Labrum Anterior to Posterior (SLAP) Lesion Combined with a Bankart Lesion: Comparative Study between Debridement and Repair of Type II SLAP Lesion by the Status of Lesion
title_fullStr Arthroscopic Treatment of a Type II Superior Labrum Anterior to Posterior (SLAP) Lesion Combined with a Bankart Lesion: Comparative Study between Debridement and Repair of Type II SLAP Lesion by the Status of Lesion
title_full_unstemmed Arthroscopic Treatment of a Type II Superior Labrum Anterior to Posterior (SLAP) Lesion Combined with a Bankart Lesion: Comparative Study between Debridement and Repair of Type II SLAP Lesion by the Status of Lesion
title_short Arthroscopic Treatment of a Type II Superior Labrum Anterior to Posterior (SLAP) Lesion Combined with a Bankart Lesion: Comparative Study between Debridement and Repair of Type II SLAP Lesion by the Status of Lesion
title_sort arthroscopic treatment of a type ii superior labrum anterior to posterior (slap) lesion combined with a bankart lesion: comparative study between debridement and repair of type ii slap lesion by the status of lesion
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7726375/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33330149
http://dx.doi.org/10.5397/cise.2018.21.1.37
work_keys_str_mv AT leesunghyun arthroscopictreatmentofatypeiisuperiorlabrumanteriortoposteriorslaplesioncombinedwithabankartlesioncomparativestudybetweendebridementandrepairoftypeiislaplesionbythestatusoflesion
AT joominsu arthroscopictreatmentofatypeiisuperiorlabrumanteriortoposteriorslaplesioncombinedwithabankartlesioncomparativestudybetweendebridementandrepairoftypeiislaplesionbythestatusoflesion
AT limkyeonghoon arthroscopictreatmentofatypeiisuperiorlabrumanteriortoposteriorslaplesioncombinedwithabankartlesioncomparativestudybetweendebridementandrepairoftypeiislaplesionbythestatusoflesion
AT kimjeongwoo arthroscopictreatmentofatypeiisuperiorlabrumanteriortoposteriorslaplesioncombinedwithabankartlesioncomparativestudybetweendebridementandrepairoftypeiislaplesionbythestatusoflesion