Cargando…
Short Humeral Stems in Shoulder Arthroplasty
Since the introduction of shoulder arthroplasty by Neer in 1974, the design of not only the glenoid component but also the humeral component used in shoulder arthroplasty has continually evolved. Changes to the design of the humeral component include a gradually disappearing proximal fin; diversifie...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Korean Shoulder and Elbow Society
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7726382/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33330161 http://dx.doi.org/10.5397/cise.2018.21.2.105 |
_version_ | 1783620874286399488 |
---|---|
author | Oh, Hwang Kyun Lim, Tae Kang |
author_facet | Oh, Hwang Kyun Lim, Tae Kang |
author_sort | Oh, Hwang Kyun |
collection | PubMed |
description | Since the introduction of shoulder arthroplasty by Neer in 1974, the design of not only the glenoid component but also the humeral component used in shoulder arthroplasty has continually evolved. Changes to the design of the humeral component include a gradually disappearing proximal fin; diversified surface finishes (such as smooth, grit-blasted, and porous coating); a more contoured stem from the originally straight and cylindrical shape; and the use of press-fit uncemented fixation as opposed to cemented fixation. Despite the evolution of the humeral component for shoulder arthroplasty, however, stem-related complications are not uncommon. Examples of stem-related complications include intraoperative humeral fractures, stem loosening, periprosthetic fractures, and stress shielding. These become much more common in revision arthroplasty, where patients are associated with further complications such as surgical difficulty in extracting the humeral component, proximal metaphyseal bone loss due to stress shielding, intraoperative humeral shaft fractures, and incomplete cement removal. Physicians have made many attempts to reduce these complications by shortening the stem of the humeral component. In this review, we will discuss some of the limitations of long-stem humeral components, the feasibility of replacing them with short-stem humeral components, and the clinical outcomes associated with short-stemmed humeral components in shoulder arthroplasty. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7726382 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Korean Shoulder and Elbow Society |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-77263822020-12-15 Short Humeral Stems in Shoulder Arthroplasty Oh, Hwang Kyun Lim, Tae Kang Clin Shoulder Elb Concise Review Since the introduction of shoulder arthroplasty by Neer in 1974, the design of not only the glenoid component but also the humeral component used in shoulder arthroplasty has continually evolved. Changes to the design of the humeral component include a gradually disappearing proximal fin; diversified surface finishes (such as smooth, grit-blasted, and porous coating); a more contoured stem from the originally straight and cylindrical shape; and the use of press-fit uncemented fixation as opposed to cemented fixation. Despite the evolution of the humeral component for shoulder arthroplasty, however, stem-related complications are not uncommon. Examples of stem-related complications include intraoperative humeral fractures, stem loosening, periprosthetic fractures, and stress shielding. These become much more common in revision arthroplasty, where patients are associated with further complications such as surgical difficulty in extracting the humeral component, proximal metaphyseal bone loss due to stress shielding, intraoperative humeral shaft fractures, and incomplete cement removal. Physicians have made many attempts to reduce these complications by shortening the stem of the humeral component. In this review, we will discuss some of the limitations of long-stem humeral components, the feasibility of replacing them with short-stem humeral components, and the clinical outcomes associated with short-stemmed humeral components in shoulder arthroplasty. Korean Shoulder and Elbow Society 2018-06-01 /pmc/articles/PMC7726382/ /pubmed/33330161 http://dx.doi.org/10.5397/cise.2018.21.2.105 Text en Copyright © 2018 Korean Shoulder and Elbow Society This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Concise Review Oh, Hwang Kyun Lim, Tae Kang Short Humeral Stems in Shoulder Arthroplasty |
title | Short Humeral Stems in Shoulder Arthroplasty |
title_full | Short Humeral Stems in Shoulder Arthroplasty |
title_fullStr | Short Humeral Stems in Shoulder Arthroplasty |
title_full_unstemmed | Short Humeral Stems in Shoulder Arthroplasty |
title_short | Short Humeral Stems in Shoulder Arthroplasty |
title_sort | short humeral stems in shoulder arthroplasty |
topic | Concise Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7726382/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33330161 http://dx.doi.org/10.5397/cise.2018.21.2.105 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ohhwangkyun shorthumeralstemsinshoulderarthroplasty AT limtaekang shorthumeralstemsinshoulderarthroplasty |