Cargando…

Short Humeral Stems in Shoulder Arthroplasty

Since the introduction of shoulder arthroplasty by Neer in 1974, the design of not only the glenoid component but also the humeral component used in shoulder arthroplasty has continually evolved. Changes to the design of the humeral component include a gradually disappearing proximal fin; diversifie...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Oh, Hwang Kyun, Lim, Tae Kang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Korean Shoulder and Elbow Society 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7726382/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33330161
http://dx.doi.org/10.5397/cise.2018.21.2.105
_version_ 1783620874286399488
author Oh, Hwang Kyun
Lim, Tae Kang
author_facet Oh, Hwang Kyun
Lim, Tae Kang
author_sort Oh, Hwang Kyun
collection PubMed
description Since the introduction of shoulder arthroplasty by Neer in 1974, the design of not only the glenoid component but also the humeral component used in shoulder arthroplasty has continually evolved. Changes to the design of the humeral component include a gradually disappearing proximal fin; diversified surface finishes (such as smooth, grit-blasted, and porous coating); a more contoured stem from the originally straight and cylindrical shape; and the use of press-fit uncemented fixation as opposed to cemented fixation. Despite the evolution of the humeral component for shoulder arthroplasty, however, stem-related complications are not uncommon. Examples of stem-related complications include intraoperative humeral fractures, stem loosening, periprosthetic fractures, and stress shielding. These become much more common in revision arthroplasty, where patients are associated with further complications such as surgical difficulty in extracting the humeral component, proximal metaphyseal bone loss due to stress shielding, intraoperative humeral shaft fractures, and incomplete cement removal. Physicians have made many attempts to reduce these complications by shortening the stem of the humeral component. In this review, we will discuss some of the limitations of long-stem humeral components, the feasibility of replacing them with short-stem humeral components, and the clinical outcomes associated with short-stemmed humeral components in shoulder arthroplasty.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7726382
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Korean Shoulder and Elbow Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77263822020-12-15 Short Humeral Stems in Shoulder Arthroplasty Oh, Hwang Kyun Lim, Tae Kang Clin Shoulder Elb Concise Review Since the introduction of shoulder arthroplasty by Neer in 1974, the design of not only the glenoid component but also the humeral component used in shoulder arthroplasty has continually evolved. Changes to the design of the humeral component include a gradually disappearing proximal fin; diversified surface finishes (such as smooth, grit-blasted, and porous coating); a more contoured stem from the originally straight and cylindrical shape; and the use of press-fit uncemented fixation as opposed to cemented fixation. Despite the evolution of the humeral component for shoulder arthroplasty, however, stem-related complications are not uncommon. Examples of stem-related complications include intraoperative humeral fractures, stem loosening, periprosthetic fractures, and stress shielding. These become much more common in revision arthroplasty, where patients are associated with further complications such as surgical difficulty in extracting the humeral component, proximal metaphyseal bone loss due to stress shielding, intraoperative humeral shaft fractures, and incomplete cement removal. Physicians have made many attempts to reduce these complications by shortening the stem of the humeral component. In this review, we will discuss some of the limitations of long-stem humeral components, the feasibility of replacing them with short-stem humeral components, and the clinical outcomes associated with short-stemmed humeral components in shoulder arthroplasty. Korean Shoulder and Elbow Society 2018-06-01 /pmc/articles/PMC7726382/ /pubmed/33330161 http://dx.doi.org/10.5397/cise.2018.21.2.105 Text en Copyright © 2018 Korean Shoulder and Elbow Society This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Concise Review
Oh, Hwang Kyun
Lim, Tae Kang
Short Humeral Stems in Shoulder Arthroplasty
title Short Humeral Stems in Shoulder Arthroplasty
title_full Short Humeral Stems in Shoulder Arthroplasty
title_fullStr Short Humeral Stems in Shoulder Arthroplasty
title_full_unstemmed Short Humeral Stems in Shoulder Arthroplasty
title_short Short Humeral Stems in Shoulder Arthroplasty
title_sort short humeral stems in shoulder arthroplasty
topic Concise Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7726382/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33330161
http://dx.doi.org/10.5397/cise.2018.21.2.105
work_keys_str_mv AT ohhwangkyun shorthumeralstemsinshoulderarthroplasty
AT limtaekang shorthumeralstemsinshoulderarthroplasty