Cargando…

Another Assessment of Fat Degeneration of Retracted Supraspinatus Muscle

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to assess the relevance of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) evaluation by occupation ratio (OR) at maximum diameter of supraspinatus muscle. METHODS: Patients from the Inje University Sanggye Paik Hospital who received rotator cuff repair and un...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jeong, Yeon-Seok, Yum, Jae-Kwang, Park, Sang-Yoon
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Korean Shoulder and Elbow Society 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7726405/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33330177
http://dx.doi.org/10.5397/cise.2018.21.4.200
_version_ 1783620879844900864
author Jeong, Yeon-Seok
Yum, Jae-Kwang
Park, Sang-Yoon
author_facet Jeong, Yeon-Seok
Yum, Jae-Kwang
Park, Sang-Yoon
author_sort Jeong, Yeon-Seok
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to assess the relevance of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) evaluation by occupation ratio (OR) at maximum diameter of supraspinatus muscle. METHODS: Patients from the Inje University Sanggye Paik Hospital who received rotator cuff repair and underwent pre- and postoperative MRI were selected as subjects of this study. On T1-weighted MRIs, OR of fat and muscle at Y-shaped view, OR at a location on supraspinatus muscle where its diameter was maximum on coronal view, and pre- and postoperative Goutallier Classification and changes in the tangent sign were measured. Statistical significance of postoperative OR was assessed regarding time from symptom onset to surgery, size of rotator cuff tear, preoperative OR, and the difference between ORs measured at maximum diameter of supraspinatus muscle and Y-shaped view. RESULTS: Preoperative OR at Y-shaped view was 52.28 ± 8.57 (32.5–65.3). Preoperative OR difference between maximum diameter and Y-shaped view was 13.76 ± 10.51 (2.38–42.04), and Pearson correlation coefficient was 0.604 (p=0.001). Postoperative OR at Y-shaped view was 63.77 ± 9.35 (37.3–76.1). Pearson correlation coefficient of pre- and postoperative Goutallier Classification was -0.579 (p=0.002) and Pearson correlation coefficient of the postoperative difference between ORs measured at maximum diameter of supraspinatus muscle and Y-shaped view was -0.386 (p=0.047). CONCLUSIONS: Fatty degeneration of supraspinatus muscle in rotator cuff tear patients should be evaluated not only in the conventional Y-shaped view, but also at location of maximum diameter of supraspinatus muscle to establish patients’ therapeutic plan.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7726405
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Korean Shoulder and Elbow Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77264052020-12-15 Another Assessment of Fat Degeneration of Retracted Supraspinatus Muscle Jeong, Yeon-Seok Yum, Jae-Kwang Park, Sang-Yoon Clin Shoulder Elb Original Article BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to assess the relevance of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) evaluation by occupation ratio (OR) at maximum diameter of supraspinatus muscle. METHODS: Patients from the Inje University Sanggye Paik Hospital who received rotator cuff repair and underwent pre- and postoperative MRI were selected as subjects of this study. On T1-weighted MRIs, OR of fat and muscle at Y-shaped view, OR at a location on supraspinatus muscle where its diameter was maximum on coronal view, and pre- and postoperative Goutallier Classification and changes in the tangent sign were measured. Statistical significance of postoperative OR was assessed regarding time from symptom onset to surgery, size of rotator cuff tear, preoperative OR, and the difference between ORs measured at maximum diameter of supraspinatus muscle and Y-shaped view. RESULTS: Preoperative OR at Y-shaped view was 52.28 ± 8.57 (32.5–65.3). Preoperative OR difference between maximum diameter and Y-shaped view was 13.76 ± 10.51 (2.38–42.04), and Pearson correlation coefficient was 0.604 (p=0.001). Postoperative OR at Y-shaped view was 63.77 ± 9.35 (37.3–76.1). Pearson correlation coefficient of pre- and postoperative Goutallier Classification was -0.579 (p=0.002) and Pearson correlation coefficient of the postoperative difference between ORs measured at maximum diameter of supraspinatus muscle and Y-shaped view was -0.386 (p=0.047). CONCLUSIONS: Fatty degeneration of supraspinatus muscle in rotator cuff tear patients should be evaluated not only in the conventional Y-shaped view, but also at location of maximum diameter of supraspinatus muscle to establish patients’ therapeutic plan. Korean Shoulder and Elbow Society 2018-12-01 /pmc/articles/PMC7726405/ /pubmed/33330177 http://dx.doi.org/10.5397/cise.2018.21.4.200 Text en Copyright © 2018 Korean Shoulder and Elbow Society This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Jeong, Yeon-Seok
Yum, Jae-Kwang
Park, Sang-Yoon
Another Assessment of Fat Degeneration of Retracted Supraspinatus Muscle
title Another Assessment of Fat Degeneration of Retracted Supraspinatus Muscle
title_full Another Assessment of Fat Degeneration of Retracted Supraspinatus Muscle
title_fullStr Another Assessment of Fat Degeneration of Retracted Supraspinatus Muscle
title_full_unstemmed Another Assessment of Fat Degeneration of Retracted Supraspinatus Muscle
title_short Another Assessment of Fat Degeneration of Retracted Supraspinatus Muscle
title_sort another assessment of fat degeneration of retracted supraspinatus muscle
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7726405/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33330177
http://dx.doi.org/10.5397/cise.2018.21.4.200
work_keys_str_mv AT jeongyeonseok anotherassessmentoffatdegenerationofretractedsupraspinatusmuscle
AT yumjaekwang anotherassessmentoffatdegenerationofretractedsupraspinatusmuscle
AT parksangyoon anotherassessmentoffatdegenerationofretractedsupraspinatusmuscle