Cargando…

Normal Range of Humeral Head Positioning on the Glenoid on Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Validation through Comparison of Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging

BACKGROUND: To determine the normal range of humeral head positioning on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). METHODS: We selected normal subjects (64 patients; group A) to study the normal range of humeral head positioning on the glenoid by MRI measurements. To compare the MRI measurement method with...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kim, Jung-Han, Min, Young-Kyoung
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Korean Shoulder and Elbow Society 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7726408/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33330175
http://dx.doi.org/10.5397/cise.2018.21.4.186
_version_ 1783620880744579072
author Kim, Jung-Han
Min, Young-Kyoung
author_facet Kim, Jung-Han
Min, Young-Kyoung
author_sort Kim, Jung-Han
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: To determine the normal range of humeral head positioning on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). METHODS: We selected normal subjects (64 patients; group A) to study the normal range of humeral head positioning on the glenoid by MRI measurements. To compare the MRI measurement method with the computed tomography (CT), we selected group B (70 patients) who underwent both MRI and CT. We measured the humeral-scapular alignment (HSA) and the humeral-glenoid alignment (HGA). RESULTS: The HSA in the control group was 1.47 ± 1.05 mm, and the HGA with and without reconstruction were 1.15 ± 0.65 mm and 1.03 ± 0.59 mm, respectively, on MRI. In the test group, HSA was 2.67 ± 1.47 mm and HGA with and without reconstruction was 1.58 ± 1.16 mm and 1.49 ± 1.08 mm, on MRI. On CT, the HSA was 1.72 ± 1.01 mm, and HGA with and without reconstruction were 1.54 ± 0.96 mm and 1.59 ± 0.93 mm, respectively. HSA was significantly different according to image modality (p=0.0006), but HGA was not significantly different regardless of reconstruction (p=0.8836 and 0.9234). CONCLUSIONS: Although additional CT scans can be taken to measure decentering in patients with rotator cuff tears, reliable measurements can be obtained with MRI alone. When using MRI, it is better to use HGA, which is a more reliable measurement value based on the comparison with CT measurement (study design: Study of Diagnostic Test; Level of evidence II).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7726408
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Korean Shoulder and Elbow Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77264082020-12-15 Normal Range of Humeral Head Positioning on the Glenoid on Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Validation through Comparison of Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging Kim, Jung-Han Min, Young-Kyoung Clin Shoulder Elb Original Article BACKGROUND: To determine the normal range of humeral head positioning on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). METHODS: We selected normal subjects (64 patients; group A) to study the normal range of humeral head positioning on the glenoid by MRI measurements. To compare the MRI measurement method with the computed tomography (CT), we selected group B (70 patients) who underwent both MRI and CT. We measured the humeral-scapular alignment (HSA) and the humeral-glenoid alignment (HGA). RESULTS: The HSA in the control group was 1.47 ± 1.05 mm, and the HGA with and without reconstruction were 1.15 ± 0.65 mm and 1.03 ± 0.59 mm, respectively, on MRI. In the test group, HSA was 2.67 ± 1.47 mm and HGA with and without reconstruction was 1.58 ± 1.16 mm and 1.49 ± 1.08 mm, on MRI. On CT, the HSA was 1.72 ± 1.01 mm, and HGA with and without reconstruction were 1.54 ± 0.96 mm and 1.59 ± 0.93 mm, respectively. HSA was significantly different according to image modality (p=0.0006), but HGA was not significantly different regardless of reconstruction (p=0.8836 and 0.9234). CONCLUSIONS: Although additional CT scans can be taken to measure decentering in patients with rotator cuff tears, reliable measurements can be obtained with MRI alone. When using MRI, it is better to use HGA, which is a more reliable measurement value based on the comparison with CT measurement (study design: Study of Diagnostic Test; Level of evidence II). Korean Shoulder and Elbow Society 2018-12-01 /pmc/articles/PMC7726408/ /pubmed/33330175 http://dx.doi.org/10.5397/cise.2018.21.4.186 Text en Copyright © 2018 Korean Shoulder and Elbow Society This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Kim, Jung-Han
Min, Young-Kyoung
Normal Range of Humeral Head Positioning on the Glenoid on Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Validation through Comparison of Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging
title Normal Range of Humeral Head Positioning on the Glenoid on Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Validation through Comparison of Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging
title_full Normal Range of Humeral Head Positioning on the Glenoid on Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Validation through Comparison of Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging
title_fullStr Normal Range of Humeral Head Positioning on the Glenoid on Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Validation through Comparison of Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging
title_full_unstemmed Normal Range of Humeral Head Positioning on the Glenoid on Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Validation through Comparison of Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging
title_short Normal Range of Humeral Head Positioning on the Glenoid on Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Validation through Comparison of Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging
title_sort normal range of humeral head positioning on the glenoid on magnetic resonance imaging: validation through comparison of computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7726408/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33330175
http://dx.doi.org/10.5397/cise.2018.21.4.186
work_keys_str_mv AT kimjunghan normalrangeofhumeralheadpositioningontheglenoidonmagneticresonanceimagingvalidationthroughcomparisonofcomputedtomographyandmagneticresonanceimaging
AT minyoungkyoung normalrangeofhumeralheadpositioningontheglenoidonmagneticresonanceimagingvalidationthroughcomparisonofcomputedtomographyandmagneticresonanceimaging