Cargando…
Normal Range of Humeral Head Positioning on the Glenoid on Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Validation through Comparison of Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging
BACKGROUND: To determine the normal range of humeral head positioning on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). METHODS: We selected normal subjects (64 patients; group A) to study the normal range of humeral head positioning on the glenoid by MRI measurements. To compare the MRI measurement method with...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Korean Shoulder and Elbow Society
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7726408/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33330175 http://dx.doi.org/10.5397/cise.2018.21.4.186 |
_version_ | 1783620880744579072 |
---|---|
author | Kim, Jung-Han Min, Young-Kyoung |
author_facet | Kim, Jung-Han Min, Young-Kyoung |
author_sort | Kim, Jung-Han |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: To determine the normal range of humeral head positioning on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). METHODS: We selected normal subjects (64 patients; group A) to study the normal range of humeral head positioning on the glenoid by MRI measurements. To compare the MRI measurement method with the computed tomography (CT), we selected group B (70 patients) who underwent both MRI and CT. We measured the humeral-scapular alignment (HSA) and the humeral-glenoid alignment (HGA). RESULTS: The HSA in the control group was 1.47 ± 1.05 mm, and the HGA with and without reconstruction were 1.15 ± 0.65 mm and 1.03 ± 0.59 mm, respectively, on MRI. In the test group, HSA was 2.67 ± 1.47 mm and HGA with and without reconstruction was 1.58 ± 1.16 mm and 1.49 ± 1.08 mm, on MRI. On CT, the HSA was 1.72 ± 1.01 mm, and HGA with and without reconstruction were 1.54 ± 0.96 mm and 1.59 ± 0.93 mm, respectively. HSA was significantly different according to image modality (p=0.0006), but HGA was not significantly different regardless of reconstruction (p=0.8836 and 0.9234). CONCLUSIONS: Although additional CT scans can be taken to measure decentering in patients with rotator cuff tears, reliable measurements can be obtained with MRI alone. When using MRI, it is better to use HGA, which is a more reliable measurement value based on the comparison with CT measurement (study design: Study of Diagnostic Test; Level of evidence II). |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7726408 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Korean Shoulder and Elbow Society |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-77264082020-12-15 Normal Range of Humeral Head Positioning on the Glenoid on Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Validation through Comparison of Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging Kim, Jung-Han Min, Young-Kyoung Clin Shoulder Elb Original Article BACKGROUND: To determine the normal range of humeral head positioning on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). METHODS: We selected normal subjects (64 patients; group A) to study the normal range of humeral head positioning on the glenoid by MRI measurements. To compare the MRI measurement method with the computed tomography (CT), we selected group B (70 patients) who underwent both MRI and CT. We measured the humeral-scapular alignment (HSA) and the humeral-glenoid alignment (HGA). RESULTS: The HSA in the control group was 1.47 ± 1.05 mm, and the HGA with and without reconstruction were 1.15 ± 0.65 mm and 1.03 ± 0.59 mm, respectively, on MRI. In the test group, HSA was 2.67 ± 1.47 mm and HGA with and without reconstruction was 1.58 ± 1.16 mm and 1.49 ± 1.08 mm, on MRI. On CT, the HSA was 1.72 ± 1.01 mm, and HGA with and without reconstruction were 1.54 ± 0.96 mm and 1.59 ± 0.93 mm, respectively. HSA was significantly different according to image modality (p=0.0006), but HGA was not significantly different regardless of reconstruction (p=0.8836 and 0.9234). CONCLUSIONS: Although additional CT scans can be taken to measure decentering in patients with rotator cuff tears, reliable measurements can be obtained with MRI alone. When using MRI, it is better to use HGA, which is a more reliable measurement value based on the comparison with CT measurement (study design: Study of Diagnostic Test; Level of evidence II). Korean Shoulder and Elbow Society 2018-12-01 /pmc/articles/PMC7726408/ /pubmed/33330175 http://dx.doi.org/10.5397/cise.2018.21.4.186 Text en Copyright © 2018 Korean Shoulder and Elbow Society This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Kim, Jung-Han Min, Young-Kyoung Normal Range of Humeral Head Positioning on the Glenoid on Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Validation through Comparison of Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging |
title | Normal Range of Humeral Head Positioning on the Glenoid on Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Validation through Comparison of Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging |
title_full | Normal Range of Humeral Head Positioning on the Glenoid on Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Validation through Comparison of Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging |
title_fullStr | Normal Range of Humeral Head Positioning on the Glenoid on Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Validation through Comparison of Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging |
title_full_unstemmed | Normal Range of Humeral Head Positioning on the Glenoid on Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Validation through Comparison of Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging |
title_short | Normal Range of Humeral Head Positioning on the Glenoid on Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Validation through Comparison of Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging |
title_sort | normal range of humeral head positioning on the glenoid on magnetic resonance imaging: validation through comparison of computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7726408/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33330175 http://dx.doi.org/10.5397/cise.2018.21.4.186 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kimjunghan normalrangeofhumeralheadpositioningontheglenoidonmagneticresonanceimagingvalidationthroughcomparisonofcomputedtomographyandmagneticresonanceimaging AT minyoungkyoung normalrangeofhumeralheadpositioningontheglenoidonmagneticresonanceimagingvalidationthroughcomparisonofcomputedtomographyandmagneticresonanceimaging |