Cargando…
Residual breast tissue after robot-assisted nipple sparing mastectomy
INTRODUCTION: While the long-term oncologic safety of robot-assisted nipple sparing mastectomy (RNSM) remains to be elucidated, histologically detected residual breast tissue (RBT) can be a surrogate for oncologically sound mastectomy. The objective of this study is to determine the presence of RBT...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7726449/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33310481 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.breast.2020.11.022 |
_version_ | 1783620890624262144 |
---|---|
author | Park, Ko Un Tozbikian, Gary H. Ferry, David Tsung, Allan Chetta, Mathew Schulz, Steven Skoracki, Roman |
author_facet | Park, Ko Un Tozbikian, Gary H. Ferry, David Tsung, Allan Chetta, Mathew Schulz, Steven Skoracki, Roman |
author_sort | Park, Ko Un |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: While the long-term oncologic safety of robot-assisted nipple sparing mastectomy (RNSM) remains to be elucidated, histologically detected residual breast tissue (RBT) can be a surrogate for oncologically sound mastectomy. The objective of this study is to determine the presence of RBT after RNSM. METHODS: Between August 2019–January 2020, we completed 5 cadaveric RNSMs. Full thickness biopsies from the mastectomy skin flap were obtained from predefined locations radially around the mastectomy skin envelop and nipple areolar complex to histologically evaluate for RBT. RESULTS: The first case was not technically feasible due to inability to obtain adequate insufflation. Five mastectomy flaps were analyzable. The average mastectomy flap thickness was 2.3 mm (range 2–3 mm) and the average specimen weight was 382.72 g (range 146.9–558.3 g). Of 70 total biopsies, RBT was detected in 11 (15.7%) biopsies. Most common location for RBT was in the nipple-areolar complex, with no RBT detected from the peripheral skin flaps. CONCLUSIONS: In this cadaveric study, RNSM is feasible leaving minimal RBT on the mastectomy flap. The most common location for RBT is in the periareolar location consistent with previous published findings after open NSM. Clinical studies are underway to evaluate the safety of RNSM. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7726449 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-77264492020-12-13 Residual breast tissue after robot-assisted nipple sparing mastectomy Park, Ko Un Tozbikian, Gary H. Ferry, David Tsung, Allan Chetta, Mathew Schulz, Steven Skoracki, Roman Breast Original Article INTRODUCTION: While the long-term oncologic safety of robot-assisted nipple sparing mastectomy (RNSM) remains to be elucidated, histologically detected residual breast tissue (RBT) can be a surrogate for oncologically sound mastectomy. The objective of this study is to determine the presence of RBT after RNSM. METHODS: Between August 2019–January 2020, we completed 5 cadaveric RNSMs. Full thickness biopsies from the mastectomy skin flap were obtained from predefined locations radially around the mastectomy skin envelop and nipple areolar complex to histologically evaluate for RBT. RESULTS: The first case was not technically feasible due to inability to obtain adequate insufflation. Five mastectomy flaps were analyzable. The average mastectomy flap thickness was 2.3 mm (range 2–3 mm) and the average specimen weight was 382.72 g (range 146.9–558.3 g). Of 70 total biopsies, RBT was detected in 11 (15.7%) biopsies. Most common location for RBT was in the nipple-areolar complex, with no RBT detected from the peripheral skin flaps. CONCLUSIONS: In this cadaveric study, RNSM is feasible leaving minimal RBT on the mastectomy flap. The most common location for RBT is in the periareolar location consistent with previous published findings after open NSM. Clinical studies are underway to evaluate the safety of RNSM. Elsevier 2020-12-03 /pmc/articles/PMC7726449/ /pubmed/33310481 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.breast.2020.11.022 Text en © 2020 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Original Article Park, Ko Un Tozbikian, Gary H. Ferry, David Tsung, Allan Chetta, Mathew Schulz, Steven Skoracki, Roman Residual breast tissue after robot-assisted nipple sparing mastectomy |
title | Residual breast tissue after robot-assisted nipple sparing mastectomy |
title_full | Residual breast tissue after robot-assisted nipple sparing mastectomy |
title_fullStr | Residual breast tissue after robot-assisted nipple sparing mastectomy |
title_full_unstemmed | Residual breast tissue after robot-assisted nipple sparing mastectomy |
title_short | Residual breast tissue after robot-assisted nipple sparing mastectomy |
title_sort | residual breast tissue after robot-assisted nipple sparing mastectomy |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7726449/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33310481 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.breast.2020.11.022 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT parkkoun residualbreasttissueafterrobotassistednipplesparingmastectomy AT tozbikiangaryh residualbreasttissueafterrobotassistednipplesparingmastectomy AT ferrydavid residualbreasttissueafterrobotassistednipplesparingmastectomy AT tsungallan residualbreasttissueafterrobotassistednipplesparingmastectomy AT chettamathew residualbreasttissueafterrobotassistednipplesparingmastectomy AT schulzsteven residualbreasttissueafterrobotassistednipplesparingmastectomy AT skorackiroman residualbreasttissueafterrobotassistednipplesparingmastectomy |