Cargando…

Residual breast tissue after robot-assisted nipple sparing mastectomy

INTRODUCTION: While the long-term oncologic safety of robot-assisted nipple sparing mastectomy (RNSM) remains to be elucidated, histologically detected residual breast tissue (RBT) can be a surrogate for oncologically sound mastectomy. The objective of this study is to determine the presence of RBT...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Park, Ko Un, Tozbikian, Gary H., Ferry, David, Tsung, Allan, Chetta, Mathew, Schulz, Steven, Skoracki, Roman
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7726449/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33310481
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.breast.2020.11.022
_version_ 1783620890624262144
author Park, Ko Un
Tozbikian, Gary H.
Ferry, David
Tsung, Allan
Chetta, Mathew
Schulz, Steven
Skoracki, Roman
author_facet Park, Ko Un
Tozbikian, Gary H.
Ferry, David
Tsung, Allan
Chetta, Mathew
Schulz, Steven
Skoracki, Roman
author_sort Park, Ko Un
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: While the long-term oncologic safety of robot-assisted nipple sparing mastectomy (RNSM) remains to be elucidated, histologically detected residual breast tissue (RBT) can be a surrogate for oncologically sound mastectomy. The objective of this study is to determine the presence of RBT after RNSM. METHODS: Between August 2019–January 2020, we completed 5 cadaveric RNSMs. Full thickness biopsies from the mastectomy skin flap were obtained from predefined locations radially around the mastectomy skin envelop and nipple areolar complex to histologically evaluate for RBT. RESULTS: The first case was not technically feasible due to inability to obtain adequate insufflation. Five mastectomy flaps were analyzable. The average mastectomy flap thickness was 2.3 mm (range 2–3 mm) and the average specimen weight was 382.72 g (range 146.9–558.3 g). Of 70 total biopsies, RBT was detected in 11 (15.7%) biopsies. Most common location for RBT was in the nipple-areolar complex, with no RBT detected from the peripheral skin flaps. CONCLUSIONS: In this cadaveric study, RNSM is feasible leaving minimal RBT on the mastectomy flap. The most common location for RBT is in the periareolar location consistent with previous published findings after open NSM. Clinical studies are underway to evaluate the safety of RNSM.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7726449
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77264492020-12-13 Residual breast tissue after robot-assisted nipple sparing mastectomy Park, Ko Un Tozbikian, Gary H. Ferry, David Tsung, Allan Chetta, Mathew Schulz, Steven Skoracki, Roman Breast Original Article INTRODUCTION: While the long-term oncologic safety of robot-assisted nipple sparing mastectomy (RNSM) remains to be elucidated, histologically detected residual breast tissue (RBT) can be a surrogate for oncologically sound mastectomy. The objective of this study is to determine the presence of RBT after RNSM. METHODS: Between August 2019–January 2020, we completed 5 cadaveric RNSMs. Full thickness biopsies from the mastectomy skin flap were obtained from predefined locations radially around the mastectomy skin envelop and nipple areolar complex to histologically evaluate for RBT. RESULTS: The first case was not technically feasible due to inability to obtain adequate insufflation. Five mastectomy flaps were analyzable. The average mastectomy flap thickness was 2.3 mm (range 2–3 mm) and the average specimen weight was 382.72 g (range 146.9–558.3 g). Of 70 total biopsies, RBT was detected in 11 (15.7%) biopsies. Most common location for RBT was in the nipple-areolar complex, with no RBT detected from the peripheral skin flaps. CONCLUSIONS: In this cadaveric study, RNSM is feasible leaving minimal RBT on the mastectomy flap. The most common location for RBT is in the periareolar location consistent with previous published findings after open NSM. Clinical studies are underway to evaluate the safety of RNSM. Elsevier 2020-12-03 /pmc/articles/PMC7726449/ /pubmed/33310481 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.breast.2020.11.022 Text en © 2020 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Article
Park, Ko Un
Tozbikian, Gary H.
Ferry, David
Tsung, Allan
Chetta, Mathew
Schulz, Steven
Skoracki, Roman
Residual breast tissue after robot-assisted nipple sparing mastectomy
title Residual breast tissue after robot-assisted nipple sparing mastectomy
title_full Residual breast tissue after robot-assisted nipple sparing mastectomy
title_fullStr Residual breast tissue after robot-assisted nipple sparing mastectomy
title_full_unstemmed Residual breast tissue after robot-assisted nipple sparing mastectomy
title_short Residual breast tissue after robot-assisted nipple sparing mastectomy
title_sort residual breast tissue after robot-assisted nipple sparing mastectomy
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7726449/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33310481
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.breast.2020.11.022
work_keys_str_mv AT parkkoun residualbreasttissueafterrobotassistednipplesparingmastectomy
AT tozbikiangaryh residualbreasttissueafterrobotassistednipplesparingmastectomy
AT ferrydavid residualbreasttissueafterrobotassistednipplesparingmastectomy
AT tsungallan residualbreasttissueafterrobotassistednipplesparingmastectomy
AT chettamathew residualbreasttissueafterrobotassistednipplesparingmastectomy
AT schulzsteven residualbreasttissueafterrobotassistednipplesparingmastectomy
AT skorackiroman residualbreasttissueafterrobotassistednipplesparingmastectomy