Cargando…

A new toolbox to distinguish the sources of spatial memory error

Studying the sources of errors in memory recall has proven invaluable for understanding the mechanisms of working memory (WM). While one-dimensional memory features (e.g., color, orientation) can be analyzed using existing mixture modeling toolboxes to separate the influence of imprecision, guessing...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Grogan, John P., Fallon, Sean J., Zokaei, Nahid, Husain, Masud, Coulthard, Elizabeth J., Manohar, Sanjay G.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7726590/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33289797
http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/jov.20.13.6
_version_ 1783620913379409920
author Grogan, John P.
Fallon, Sean J.
Zokaei, Nahid
Husain, Masud
Coulthard, Elizabeth J.
Manohar, Sanjay G.
author_facet Grogan, John P.
Fallon, Sean J.
Zokaei, Nahid
Husain, Masud
Coulthard, Elizabeth J.
Manohar, Sanjay G.
author_sort Grogan, John P.
collection PubMed
description Studying the sources of errors in memory recall has proven invaluable for understanding the mechanisms of working memory (WM). While one-dimensional memory features (e.g., color, orientation) can be analyzed using existing mixture modeling toolboxes to separate the influence of imprecision, guessing, and misbinding (the tendency to confuse features that belong to different memoranda), such toolboxes are not currently available for two-dimensional spatial WM tasks. Here we present a method to isolate sources of spatial error in tasks where participants have to report the spatial location of an item in memory, using two-dimensional mixture models. The method recovers simulated parameters well and is robust to the influence of response distributions and biases, as well as number of nontargets and trials. To demonstrate the model, we fit data from a complex spatial WM task and show the recovered parameters correspond well with previous spatial WM findings and with recovered parameters on a one-dimensional analogue of this task, suggesting convergent validity for this two-dimensional modeling approach. Because the extra dimension allows greater separation of memoranda and responses, spatial tasks turn out to be much better for separating misbinding from imprecision and guessing than one-dimensional tasks. Code for these models is freely available in the MemToolbox2D package and is integrated to work with the commonly used MATLAB package MemToolbox.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7726590
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77265902020-12-21 A new toolbox to distinguish the sources of spatial memory error Grogan, John P. Fallon, Sean J. Zokaei, Nahid Husain, Masud Coulthard, Elizabeth J. Manohar, Sanjay G. J Vis Methods Studying the sources of errors in memory recall has proven invaluable for understanding the mechanisms of working memory (WM). While one-dimensional memory features (e.g., color, orientation) can be analyzed using existing mixture modeling toolboxes to separate the influence of imprecision, guessing, and misbinding (the tendency to confuse features that belong to different memoranda), such toolboxes are not currently available for two-dimensional spatial WM tasks. Here we present a method to isolate sources of spatial error in tasks where participants have to report the spatial location of an item in memory, using two-dimensional mixture models. The method recovers simulated parameters well and is robust to the influence of response distributions and biases, as well as number of nontargets and trials. To demonstrate the model, we fit data from a complex spatial WM task and show the recovered parameters correspond well with previous spatial WM findings and with recovered parameters on a one-dimensional analogue of this task, suggesting convergent validity for this two-dimensional modeling approach. Because the extra dimension allows greater separation of memoranda and responses, spatial tasks turn out to be much better for separating misbinding from imprecision and guessing than one-dimensional tasks. Code for these models is freely available in the MemToolbox2D package and is integrated to work with the commonly used MATLAB package MemToolbox. The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology 2020-12-08 /pmc/articles/PMC7726590/ /pubmed/33289797 http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/jov.20.13.6 Text en Copyright 2020 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
spellingShingle Methods
Grogan, John P.
Fallon, Sean J.
Zokaei, Nahid
Husain, Masud
Coulthard, Elizabeth J.
Manohar, Sanjay G.
A new toolbox to distinguish the sources of spatial memory error
title A new toolbox to distinguish the sources of spatial memory error
title_full A new toolbox to distinguish the sources of spatial memory error
title_fullStr A new toolbox to distinguish the sources of spatial memory error
title_full_unstemmed A new toolbox to distinguish the sources of spatial memory error
title_short A new toolbox to distinguish the sources of spatial memory error
title_sort new toolbox to distinguish the sources of spatial memory error
topic Methods
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7726590/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33289797
http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/jov.20.13.6
work_keys_str_mv AT groganjohnp anewtoolboxtodistinguishthesourcesofspatialmemoryerror
AT fallonseanj anewtoolboxtodistinguishthesourcesofspatialmemoryerror
AT zokaeinahid anewtoolboxtodistinguishthesourcesofspatialmemoryerror
AT husainmasud anewtoolboxtodistinguishthesourcesofspatialmemoryerror
AT coulthardelizabethj anewtoolboxtodistinguishthesourcesofspatialmemoryerror
AT manoharsanjayg anewtoolboxtodistinguishthesourcesofspatialmemoryerror
AT groganjohnp newtoolboxtodistinguishthesourcesofspatialmemoryerror
AT fallonseanj newtoolboxtodistinguishthesourcesofspatialmemoryerror
AT zokaeinahid newtoolboxtodistinguishthesourcesofspatialmemoryerror
AT husainmasud newtoolboxtodistinguishthesourcesofspatialmemoryerror
AT coulthardelizabethj newtoolboxtodistinguishthesourcesofspatialmemoryerror
AT manoharsanjayg newtoolboxtodistinguishthesourcesofspatialmemoryerror