Cargando…

The comparison of health‐related quality of life and patient satisfaction between single‐incision and multiport laparoscopic colectomy for cancer: A sub‐study of a randomized, prospective clinical trial

AIM: The present study clarified the effect on the health‐related quality of life and patient satisfaction of single‐incision laparoscopic colectomy compared with multiport laparoscopic colectomy for colorectal cancer. METHODS: We conducted a multicenter, randomized, control trial comparing single‐i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ohya, Hiroki, Watanabe, Jun, Suwa, Yusuke, Suwa, Hirokazu, Ozawa, Mayumi, Ishibe, Atsushi, Fujii, Shoichi, Kubota, Kazumi, Kunisaki, Chikara, Endo, Itaru
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7726688/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33319159
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ags3.12378
_version_ 1783620935655358464
author Ohya, Hiroki
Watanabe, Jun
Suwa, Yusuke
Suwa, Hirokazu
Ozawa, Mayumi
Ishibe, Atsushi
Fujii, Shoichi
Kubota, Kazumi
Kunisaki, Chikara
Endo, Itaru
author_facet Ohya, Hiroki
Watanabe, Jun
Suwa, Yusuke
Suwa, Hirokazu
Ozawa, Mayumi
Ishibe, Atsushi
Fujii, Shoichi
Kubota, Kazumi
Kunisaki, Chikara
Endo, Itaru
author_sort Ohya, Hiroki
collection PubMed
description AIM: The present study clarified the effect on the health‐related quality of life and patient satisfaction of single‐incision laparoscopic colectomy compared with multiport laparoscopic colectomy for colorectal cancer. METHODS: We conducted a multicenter, randomized, control trial comparing single‐incision and multiport laparoscopic colectomy for colon cancer. We performed a pre‐planned secondary analysis of health‐related quality of life and patient satisfaction data of 200 patients. Health‐related quality of life was evaluated using the Japanese 36‐item Short Form Health Survey (SF‐36) version 2.0 before surgery and at 1 month after surgery. Patient satisfaction was compared using seven questionnaires at 1 month after surgery. RESULTS: One hundred patients were assigned to each group. After excluding 18 patients (9.0%) who did not complete the SF‐36, 182 patients (91.0%) were included in the analysis (92 cases of single‐incision laparoscopic colectomy and 90 cases of multiport laparoscopic colectomy). The SF‐36 scores at 1 month after surgery were not significantly different between the two arms. The role physical, bodily pain, vitality and physical component summary were significantly lower at 1 month after surgery than before in both groups. However, the role emotional was significantly lower after surgery than before only in the single‐incision laparoscopic colectomy group. In terms of patient satisfaction at 1 month after surgery, there were no significant differences in any of the seven items on the questionnaire. CONCLUSIONS: Single‐incision laparoscopic colectomy was similar to multiport laparoscopic colectomy in terms of health‐related quality of life and patient satisfaction. However, single‐incision laparoscopic colectomy may be inferior than multiport laparoscopic colectomy in terms of the role emotional.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7726688
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77266882020-12-13 The comparison of health‐related quality of life and patient satisfaction between single‐incision and multiport laparoscopic colectomy for cancer: A sub‐study of a randomized, prospective clinical trial Ohya, Hiroki Watanabe, Jun Suwa, Yusuke Suwa, Hirokazu Ozawa, Mayumi Ishibe, Atsushi Fujii, Shoichi Kubota, Kazumi Kunisaki, Chikara Endo, Itaru Ann Gastroenterol Surg Original Articles AIM: The present study clarified the effect on the health‐related quality of life and patient satisfaction of single‐incision laparoscopic colectomy compared with multiport laparoscopic colectomy for colorectal cancer. METHODS: We conducted a multicenter, randomized, control trial comparing single‐incision and multiport laparoscopic colectomy for colon cancer. We performed a pre‐planned secondary analysis of health‐related quality of life and patient satisfaction data of 200 patients. Health‐related quality of life was evaluated using the Japanese 36‐item Short Form Health Survey (SF‐36) version 2.0 before surgery and at 1 month after surgery. Patient satisfaction was compared using seven questionnaires at 1 month after surgery. RESULTS: One hundred patients were assigned to each group. After excluding 18 patients (9.0%) who did not complete the SF‐36, 182 patients (91.0%) were included in the analysis (92 cases of single‐incision laparoscopic colectomy and 90 cases of multiport laparoscopic colectomy). The SF‐36 scores at 1 month after surgery were not significantly different between the two arms. The role physical, bodily pain, vitality and physical component summary were significantly lower at 1 month after surgery than before in both groups. However, the role emotional was significantly lower after surgery than before only in the single‐incision laparoscopic colectomy group. In terms of patient satisfaction at 1 month after surgery, there were no significant differences in any of the seven items on the questionnaire. CONCLUSIONS: Single‐incision laparoscopic colectomy was similar to multiport laparoscopic colectomy in terms of health‐related quality of life and patient satisfaction. However, single‐incision laparoscopic colectomy may be inferior than multiport laparoscopic colectomy in terms of the role emotional. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-07-23 /pmc/articles/PMC7726688/ /pubmed/33319159 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ags3.12378 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Annals of Gastroenterological Surgery published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of The Japanese Society of Gastroenterology This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Ohya, Hiroki
Watanabe, Jun
Suwa, Yusuke
Suwa, Hirokazu
Ozawa, Mayumi
Ishibe, Atsushi
Fujii, Shoichi
Kubota, Kazumi
Kunisaki, Chikara
Endo, Itaru
The comparison of health‐related quality of life and patient satisfaction between single‐incision and multiport laparoscopic colectomy for cancer: A sub‐study of a randomized, prospective clinical trial
title The comparison of health‐related quality of life and patient satisfaction between single‐incision and multiport laparoscopic colectomy for cancer: A sub‐study of a randomized, prospective clinical trial
title_full The comparison of health‐related quality of life and patient satisfaction between single‐incision and multiport laparoscopic colectomy for cancer: A sub‐study of a randomized, prospective clinical trial
title_fullStr The comparison of health‐related quality of life and patient satisfaction between single‐incision and multiport laparoscopic colectomy for cancer: A sub‐study of a randomized, prospective clinical trial
title_full_unstemmed The comparison of health‐related quality of life and patient satisfaction between single‐incision and multiport laparoscopic colectomy for cancer: A sub‐study of a randomized, prospective clinical trial
title_short The comparison of health‐related quality of life and patient satisfaction between single‐incision and multiport laparoscopic colectomy for cancer: A sub‐study of a randomized, prospective clinical trial
title_sort comparison of health‐related quality of life and patient satisfaction between single‐incision and multiport laparoscopic colectomy for cancer: a sub‐study of a randomized, prospective clinical trial
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7726688/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33319159
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ags3.12378
work_keys_str_mv AT ohyahiroki thecomparisonofhealthrelatedqualityoflifeandpatientsatisfactionbetweensingleincisionandmultiportlaparoscopiccolectomyforcancerasubstudyofarandomizedprospectiveclinicaltrial
AT watanabejun thecomparisonofhealthrelatedqualityoflifeandpatientsatisfactionbetweensingleincisionandmultiportlaparoscopiccolectomyforcancerasubstudyofarandomizedprospectiveclinicaltrial
AT suwayusuke thecomparisonofhealthrelatedqualityoflifeandpatientsatisfactionbetweensingleincisionandmultiportlaparoscopiccolectomyforcancerasubstudyofarandomizedprospectiveclinicaltrial
AT suwahirokazu thecomparisonofhealthrelatedqualityoflifeandpatientsatisfactionbetweensingleincisionandmultiportlaparoscopiccolectomyforcancerasubstudyofarandomizedprospectiveclinicaltrial
AT ozawamayumi thecomparisonofhealthrelatedqualityoflifeandpatientsatisfactionbetweensingleincisionandmultiportlaparoscopiccolectomyforcancerasubstudyofarandomizedprospectiveclinicaltrial
AT ishibeatsushi thecomparisonofhealthrelatedqualityoflifeandpatientsatisfactionbetweensingleincisionandmultiportlaparoscopiccolectomyforcancerasubstudyofarandomizedprospectiveclinicaltrial
AT fujiishoichi thecomparisonofhealthrelatedqualityoflifeandpatientsatisfactionbetweensingleincisionandmultiportlaparoscopiccolectomyforcancerasubstudyofarandomizedprospectiveclinicaltrial
AT kubotakazumi thecomparisonofhealthrelatedqualityoflifeandpatientsatisfactionbetweensingleincisionandmultiportlaparoscopiccolectomyforcancerasubstudyofarandomizedprospectiveclinicaltrial
AT kunisakichikara thecomparisonofhealthrelatedqualityoflifeandpatientsatisfactionbetweensingleincisionandmultiportlaparoscopiccolectomyforcancerasubstudyofarandomizedprospectiveclinicaltrial
AT endoitaru thecomparisonofhealthrelatedqualityoflifeandpatientsatisfactionbetweensingleincisionandmultiportlaparoscopiccolectomyforcancerasubstudyofarandomizedprospectiveclinicaltrial
AT ohyahiroki comparisonofhealthrelatedqualityoflifeandpatientsatisfactionbetweensingleincisionandmultiportlaparoscopiccolectomyforcancerasubstudyofarandomizedprospectiveclinicaltrial
AT watanabejun comparisonofhealthrelatedqualityoflifeandpatientsatisfactionbetweensingleincisionandmultiportlaparoscopiccolectomyforcancerasubstudyofarandomizedprospectiveclinicaltrial
AT suwayusuke comparisonofhealthrelatedqualityoflifeandpatientsatisfactionbetweensingleincisionandmultiportlaparoscopiccolectomyforcancerasubstudyofarandomizedprospectiveclinicaltrial
AT suwahirokazu comparisonofhealthrelatedqualityoflifeandpatientsatisfactionbetweensingleincisionandmultiportlaparoscopiccolectomyforcancerasubstudyofarandomizedprospectiveclinicaltrial
AT ozawamayumi comparisonofhealthrelatedqualityoflifeandpatientsatisfactionbetweensingleincisionandmultiportlaparoscopiccolectomyforcancerasubstudyofarandomizedprospectiveclinicaltrial
AT ishibeatsushi comparisonofhealthrelatedqualityoflifeandpatientsatisfactionbetweensingleincisionandmultiportlaparoscopiccolectomyforcancerasubstudyofarandomizedprospectiveclinicaltrial
AT fujiishoichi comparisonofhealthrelatedqualityoflifeandpatientsatisfactionbetweensingleincisionandmultiportlaparoscopiccolectomyforcancerasubstudyofarandomizedprospectiveclinicaltrial
AT kubotakazumi comparisonofhealthrelatedqualityoflifeandpatientsatisfactionbetweensingleincisionandmultiportlaparoscopiccolectomyforcancerasubstudyofarandomizedprospectiveclinicaltrial
AT kunisakichikara comparisonofhealthrelatedqualityoflifeandpatientsatisfactionbetweensingleincisionandmultiportlaparoscopiccolectomyforcancerasubstudyofarandomizedprospectiveclinicaltrial
AT endoitaru comparisonofhealthrelatedqualityoflifeandpatientsatisfactionbetweensingleincisionandmultiportlaparoscopiccolectomyforcancerasubstudyofarandomizedprospectiveclinicaltrial