Cargando…
Validation of the interview-based life-space assessment in institutionalized settings (LSA-IS) for older persons with and without cognitive impairment
BACKGROUND: Self-reported life-space assessment methods so far focus on community-dwelling persons, with a lack of validated assessment methods for institutionalized settings. This study evaluated construct validity, test-retest reliability, sensitivity to change, and feasibility of a new Life-Space...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7726908/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33302883 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12877-020-01927-8 |
_version_ | 1783620983470424064 |
---|---|
author | Hauer, Klaus Ullrich, Phoebe Heldmann, Patrick Hummel, Saskia Bauer, Jürgen M. Werner, Christian |
author_facet | Hauer, Klaus Ullrich, Phoebe Heldmann, Patrick Hummel, Saskia Bauer, Jürgen M. Werner, Christian |
author_sort | Hauer, Klaus |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Self-reported life-space assessment methods so far focus on community-dwelling persons, with a lack of validated assessment methods for institutionalized settings. This study evaluated construct validity, test-retest reliability, sensitivity to change, and feasibility of a new Life-Space Assessment for Institutionalized Settings (LSA-IS) in geriatric patients. METHODS: Psychometric properties of the LSA-IS in 119 hospitalized geriatric patients (83.0 ± 6.2 years) with and without cognitive impairment (CI) [Mini-Mental State Examination: 22.4 ± 4.9 scores] were evaluated within a comprehensive validation design. For the total group and subgroups according to cognitive status, construct validity was assessed by calculating Spearman’s rank correlation coefficients (rho) with established construct variables, test–retest reliability by intra-class correlation coefficients (ICCs), sensitivity to change by standardized response means (SRMs) calculated for effects of early ward-based rehabilitation during hospital stay. RESULTS: The LSA-IS (total score) demonstrated good test–retest reliability (ICC = .704), and large sensitivity to change (SRM = .806), while construct validity was small to high indicated by significant correlations of the LSA-IS to construct variables (rho = .208–716), depending on relative construct association. On average results of LSA-IS sub-scores confirmed results of the total score. Subgroups according to cognitive status did not differ for most analyzed variables. A completion rate of 100% and a completion time of 3.2 ± 1.2 min documented excellent feasibility. CONCLUSIONS: The interview-based LSA-IS has proven to be valid, reliable, sensitive, and feasible in hospitalized, multi-morbid, geriatric patients with and without CI documenting good psychometric properties for institutionalized settings. TRIAL REGISTRATION: DRKS00016028 |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7726908 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-77269082020-12-10 Validation of the interview-based life-space assessment in institutionalized settings (LSA-IS) for older persons with and without cognitive impairment Hauer, Klaus Ullrich, Phoebe Heldmann, Patrick Hummel, Saskia Bauer, Jürgen M. Werner, Christian BMC Geriatr Research Article BACKGROUND: Self-reported life-space assessment methods so far focus on community-dwelling persons, with a lack of validated assessment methods for institutionalized settings. This study evaluated construct validity, test-retest reliability, sensitivity to change, and feasibility of a new Life-Space Assessment for Institutionalized Settings (LSA-IS) in geriatric patients. METHODS: Psychometric properties of the LSA-IS in 119 hospitalized geriatric patients (83.0 ± 6.2 years) with and without cognitive impairment (CI) [Mini-Mental State Examination: 22.4 ± 4.9 scores] were evaluated within a comprehensive validation design. For the total group and subgroups according to cognitive status, construct validity was assessed by calculating Spearman’s rank correlation coefficients (rho) with established construct variables, test–retest reliability by intra-class correlation coefficients (ICCs), sensitivity to change by standardized response means (SRMs) calculated for effects of early ward-based rehabilitation during hospital stay. RESULTS: The LSA-IS (total score) demonstrated good test–retest reliability (ICC = .704), and large sensitivity to change (SRM = .806), while construct validity was small to high indicated by significant correlations of the LSA-IS to construct variables (rho = .208–716), depending on relative construct association. On average results of LSA-IS sub-scores confirmed results of the total score. Subgroups according to cognitive status did not differ for most analyzed variables. A completion rate of 100% and a completion time of 3.2 ± 1.2 min documented excellent feasibility. CONCLUSIONS: The interview-based LSA-IS has proven to be valid, reliable, sensitive, and feasible in hospitalized, multi-morbid, geriatric patients with and without CI documenting good psychometric properties for institutionalized settings. TRIAL REGISTRATION: DRKS00016028 BioMed Central 2020-12-10 /pmc/articles/PMC7726908/ /pubmed/33302883 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12877-020-01927-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Hauer, Klaus Ullrich, Phoebe Heldmann, Patrick Hummel, Saskia Bauer, Jürgen M. Werner, Christian Validation of the interview-based life-space assessment in institutionalized settings (LSA-IS) for older persons with and without cognitive impairment |
title | Validation of the interview-based life-space assessment in institutionalized settings (LSA-IS) for older persons with and without cognitive impairment |
title_full | Validation of the interview-based life-space assessment in institutionalized settings (LSA-IS) for older persons with and without cognitive impairment |
title_fullStr | Validation of the interview-based life-space assessment in institutionalized settings (LSA-IS) for older persons with and without cognitive impairment |
title_full_unstemmed | Validation of the interview-based life-space assessment in institutionalized settings (LSA-IS) for older persons with and without cognitive impairment |
title_short | Validation of the interview-based life-space assessment in institutionalized settings (LSA-IS) for older persons with and without cognitive impairment |
title_sort | validation of the interview-based life-space assessment in institutionalized settings (lsa-is) for older persons with and without cognitive impairment |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7726908/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33302883 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12877-020-01927-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hauerklaus validationoftheinterviewbasedlifespaceassessmentininstitutionalizedsettingslsaisforolderpersonswithandwithoutcognitiveimpairment AT ullrichphoebe validationoftheinterviewbasedlifespaceassessmentininstitutionalizedsettingslsaisforolderpersonswithandwithoutcognitiveimpairment AT heldmannpatrick validationoftheinterviewbasedlifespaceassessmentininstitutionalizedsettingslsaisforolderpersonswithandwithoutcognitiveimpairment AT hummelsaskia validationoftheinterviewbasedlifespaceassessmentininstitutionalizedsettingslsaisforolderpersonswithandwithoutcognitiveimpairment AT bauerjurgenm validationoftheinterviewbasedlifespaceassessmentininstitutionalizedsettingslsaisforolderpersonswithandwithoutcognitiveimpairment AT wernerchristian validationoftheinterviewbasedlifespaceassessmentininstitutionalizedsettingslsaisforolderpersonswithandwithoutcognitiveimpairment |