Cargando…

Validation of the interview-based life-space assessment in institutionalized settings (LSA-IS) for older persons with and without cognitive impairment

BACKGROUND: Self-reported life-space assessment methods so far focus on community-dwelling persons, with a lack of validated assessment methods for institutionalized settings. This study evaluated construct validity, test-retest reliability, sensitivity to change, and feasibility of a new Life-Space...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hauer, Klaus, Ullrich, Phoebe, Heldmann, Patrick, Hummel, Saskia, Bauer, Jürgen M., Werner, Christian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7726908/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33302883
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12877-020-01927-8
_version_ 1783620983470424064
author Hauer, Klaus
Ullrich, Phoebe
Heldmann, Patrick
Hummel, Saskia
Bauer, Jürgen M.
Werner, Christian
author_facet Hauer, Klaus
Ullrich, Phoebe
Heldmann, Patrick
Hummel, Saskia
Bauer, Jürgen M.
Werner, Christian
author_sort Hauer, Klaus
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Self-reported life-space assessment methods so far focus on community-dwelling persons, with a lack of validated assessment methods for institutionalized settings. This study evaluated construct validity, test-retest reliability, sensitivity to change, and feasibility of a new Life-Space Assessment for Institutionalized Settings (LSA-IS) in geriatric patients. METHODS: Psychometric properties of the LSA-IS in 119 hospitalized geriatric patients (83.0 ± 6.2 years) with and without cognitive impairment (CI) [Mini-Mental State Examination: 22.4 ± 4.9 scores] were evaluated within a comprehensive validation design. For the total group and subgroups according to cognitive status, construct validity was assessed by calculating Spearman’s rank correlation coefficients (rho) with established construct variables, test–retest reliability by intra-class correlation coefficients (ICCs), sensitivity to change by standardized response means (SRMs) calculated for effects of early ward-based rehabilitation during hospital stay. RESULTS: The LSA-IS (total score) demonstrated good test–retest reliability (ICC = .704), and large sensitivity to change (SRM = .806), while construct validity was small to high indicated by significant correlations of the LSA-IS to construct variables (rho = .208–716), depending on relative construct association. On average results of LSA-IS sub-scores confirmed results of the total score. Subgroups according to cognitive status did not differ for most analyzed variables. A completion rate of 100% and a completion time of 3.2 ± 1.2 min documented excellent feasibility. CONCLUSIONS: The interview-based LSA-IS has proven to be valid, reliable, sensitive, and feasible in hospitalized, multi-morbid, geriatric patients with and without CI documenting good psychometric properties for institutionalized settings. TRIAL REGISTRATION: DRKS00016028
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7726908
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77269082020-12-10 Validation of the interview-based life-space assessment in institutionalized settings (LSA-IS) for older persons with and without cognitive impairment Hauer, Klaus Ullrich, Phoebe Heldmann, Patrick Hummel, Saskia Bauer, Jürgen M. Werner, Christian BMC Geriatr Research Article BACKGROUND: Self-reported life-space assessment methods so far focus on community-dwelling persons, with a lack of validated assessment methods for institutionalized settings. This study evaluated construct validity, test-retest reliability, sensitivity to change, and feasibility of a new Life-Space Assessment for Institutionalized Settings (LSA-IS) in geriatric patients. METHODS: Psychometric properties of the LSA-IS in 119 hospitalized geriatric patients (83.0 ± 6.2 years) with and without cognitive impairment (CI) [Mini-Mental State Examination: 22.4 ± 4.9 scores] were evaluated within a comprehensive validation design. For the total group and subgroups according to cognitive status, construct validity was assessed by calculating Spearman’s rank correlation coefficients (rho) with established construct variables, test–retest reliability by intra-class correlation coefficients (ICCs), sensitivity to change by standardized response means (SRMs) calculated for effects of early ward-based rehabilitation during hospital stay. RESULTS: The LSA-IS (total score) demonstrated good test–retest reliability (ICC = .704), and large sensitivity to change (SRM = .806), while construct validity was small to high indicated by significant correlations of the LSA-IS to construct variables (rho = .208–716), depending on relative construct association. On average results of LSA-IS sub-scores confirmed results of the total score. Subgroups according to cognitive status did not differ for most analyzed variables. A completion rate of 100% and a completion time of 3.2 ± 1.2 min documented excellent feasibility. CONCLUSIONS: The interview-based LSA-IS has proven to be valid, reliable, sensitive, and feasible in hospitalized, multi-morbid, geriatric patients with and without CI documenting good psychometric properties for institutionalized settings. TRIAL REGISTRATION: DRKS00016028 BioMed Central 2020-12-10 /pmc/articles/PMC7726908/ /pubmed/33302883 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12877-020-01927-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Hauer, Klaus
Ullrich, Phoebe
Heldmann, Patrick
Hummel, Saskia
Bauer, Jürgen M.
Werner, Christian
Validation of the interview-based life-space assessment in institutionalized settings (LSA-IS) for older persons with and without cognitive impairment
title Validation of the interview-based life-space assessment in institutionalized settings (LSA-IS) for older persons with and without cognitive impairment
title_full Validation of the interview-based life-space assessment in institutionalized settings (LSA-IS) for older persons with and without cognitive impairment
title_fullStr Validation of the interview-based life-space assessment in institutionalized settings (LSA-IS) for older persons with and without cognitive impairment
title_full_unstemmed Validation of the interview-based life-space assessment in institutionalized settings (LSA-IS) for older persons with and without cognitive impairment
title_short Validation of the interview-based life-space assessment in institutionalized settings (LSA-IS) for older persons with and without cognitive impairment
title_sort validation of the interview-based life-space assessment in institutionalized settings (lsa-is) for older persons with and without cognitive impairment
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7726908/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33302883
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12877-020-01927-8
work_keys_str_mv AT hauerklaus validationoftheinterviewbasedlifespaceassessmentininstitutionalizedsettingslsaisforolderpersonswithandwithoutcognitiveimpairment
AT ullrichphoebe validationoftheinterviewbasedlifespaceassessmentininstitutionalizedsettingslsaisforolderpersonswithandwithoutcognitiveimpairment
AT heldmannpatrick validationoftheinterviewbasedlifespaceassessmentininstitutionalizedsettingslsaisforolderpersonswithandwithoutcognitiveimpairment
AT hummelsaskia validationoftheinterviewbasedlifespaceassessmentininstitutionalizedsettingslsaisforolderpersonswithandwithoutcognitiveimpairment
AT bauerjurgenm validationoftheinterviewbasedlifespaceassessmentininstitutionalizedsettingslsaisforolderpersonswithandwithoutcognitiveimpairment
AT wernerchristian validationoftheinterviewbasedlifespaceassessmentininstitutionalizedsettingslsaisforolderpersonswithandwithoutcognitiveimpairment