Cargando…
Nonhyperemic Pressure Ratios Versus Fractional Flow Reserve: What to Do With Discordant Results?
Autores principales: | Paul, Timir K., Seto, Arnold H., White, Christopher J. |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7726967/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32914669 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.120.018344 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Understanding Fractional Flow Reserve/Instantaneous Wave‐Free Ratio Discordance Can Provide Coronary Clarity
por: Tehrani, David M., et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Coronary Flow Variations Following Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Affect Diastolic Nonhyperemic Pressure Ratios More Than the Whole Cycle Ratios
por: Aetesam‐ur‐Rahman, Muhammad, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Decoding fractional flow reserve/instantaneous wave-free ratio discordance: is flow the answer?
por: van Nunen, Lokien X., et al.
Publicado: (2023) -
Long‐Term Clinical Outcomes of Nonhyperemic Pressure Ratios: Resting Full‐Cycle Ratio, Diastolic Pressure Ratio, and Instantaneous Wave‐Free Ratio
por: Lee, Joo Myung, et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
Effect of Elevated Left Ventricular End Diastolic Pressure on Instantaneous Wave-Free Ratio and Fractional Flow Reserve Discordance
por: Tahir, Hassan, et al.
Publicado: (2021)