Cargando…

Fully Automated Cardiac Assessment for Diagnostic and Prognostic Stratification Following Myocardial Infarction

BACKGROUND: Cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging is considered the reference methodology for cardiac morphology and function but requires manual postprocessing. Whether novel artificial intelligence–based automated analyses deliver similar information for risk stratification is unknown. Therefo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schuster, Andreas, Lange, Torben, Backhaus, Sören J., Strohmeyer, Carolin, Boom, Patricia C., Matz, Jonas, Kowallick, Johannes T., Lotz, Joachim, Steinmetz, Michael, Kutty, Shelby, Bigalke, Boris, Gutberlet, Matthias, de Waha‐Thiele, Suzanne, Desch, Steffen, Hasenfuß, Gerd, Thiele, Holger, Stiermaier, Thomas, Eitel, Ingo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7726968/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32873121
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.120.016612
_version_ 1783620998170411008
author Schuster, Andreas
Lange, Torben
Backhaus, Sören J.
Strohmeyer, Carolin
Boom, Patricia C.
Matz, Jonas
Kowallick, Johannes T.
Lotz, Joachim
Steinmetz, Michael
Kutty, Shelby
Bigalke, Boris
Gutberlet, Matthias
de Waha‐Thiele, Suzanne
Desch, Steffen
Hasenfuß, Gerd
Thiele, Holger
Stiermaier, Thomas
Eitel, Ingo
author_facet Schuster, Andreas
Lange, Torben
Backhaus, Sören J.
Strohmeyer, Carolin
Boom, Patricia C.
Matz, Jonas
Kowallick, Johannes T.
Lotz, Joachim
Steinmetz, Michael
Kutty, Shelby
Bigalke, Boris
Gutberlet, Matthias
de Waha‐Thiele, Suzanne
Desch, Steffen
Hasenfuß, Gerd
Thiele, Holger
Stiermaier, Thomas
Eitel, Ingo
author_sort Schuster, Andreas
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging is considered the reference methodology for cardiac morphology and function but requires manual postprocessing. Whether novel artificial intelligence–based automated analyses deliver similar information for risk stratification is unknown. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate feasibility and prognostic implications of artificial intelligence–based, commercially available software analyses. METHODS AND RESULTS: Cardiovascular magnetic resonance data (n=1017 patients) from 2 myocardial infarction multicenter trials were included. Analyses of biventricular parameters including ejection fraction (EF) were manually and automatically assessed using conventional and artificial intelligence–based software. Obtained parameters entered regression analyses for prediction of major adverse cardiac events, defined as death, reinfarction, or congestive heart failure, within 1 year after the acute event. Both manual and uncorrected automated volumetric assessments showed similar impact on outcome in univariate analyses (left ventricular EF, manual: hazard ratio [HR], 0.93 [95% CI 0.91–0.95]; P<0.001; automated: HR, 0.94 [95% CI, 0.92–0.96]; P<0.001) and multivariable analyses (left ventricular EF, manual: HR, 0.95 [95% CI, 0.92–0.98]; P=0.001; automated: HR, 0.95 [95% CI, 0.92–0.98]; P=0.001). Manual correction of the automated contours did not lead to improved risk prediction (left ventricular EF, area under the curve: 0.67 automated versus 0.68 automated corrected; P=0.49). There was acceptable agreement (left ventricular EF: bias, 2.6%; 95% limits of agreement, −9.1% to 14.2%; intraclass correlation coefficient, 0.88 [95% CI, 0.77–0.93]) of manual and automated volumetric assessments. CONCLUSIONS: User‐independent volumetric analyses performed by fully automated software are feasible, and results are equally predictive of major adverse cardiac events compared with conventional analyses in patients following myocardial infarction. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifiers: NCT00712101 and NCT01612312.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7726968
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77269682020-12-13 Fully Automated Cardiac Assessment for Diagnostic and Prognostic Stratification Following Myocardial Infarction Schuster, Andreas Lange, Torben Backhaus, Sören J. Strohmeyer, Carolin Boom, Patricia C. Matz, Jonas Kowallick, Johannes T. Lotz, Joachim Steinmetz, Michael Kutty, Shelby Bigalke, Boris Gutberlet, Matthias de Waha‐Thiele, Suzanne Desch, Steffen Hasenfuß, Gerd Thiele, Holger Stiermaier, Thomas Eitel, Ingo J Am Heart Assoc Original Research BACKGROUND: Cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging is considered the reference methodology for cardiac morphology and function but requires manual postprocessing. Whether novel artificial intelligence–based automated analyses deliver similar information for risk stratification is unknown. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate feasibility and prognostic implications of artificial intelligence–based, commercially available software analyses. METHODS AND RESULTS: Cardiovascular magnetic resonance data (n=1017 patients) from 2 myocardial infarction multicenter trials were included. Analyses of biventricular parameters including ejection fraction (EF) were manually and automatically assessed using conventional and artificial intelligence–based software. Obtained parameters entered regression analyses for prediction of major adverse cardiac events, defined as death, reinfarction, or congestive heart failure, within 1 year after the acute event. Both manual and uncorrected automated volumetric assessments showed similar impact on outcome in univariate analyses (left ventricular EF, manual: hazard ratio [HR], 0.93 [95% CI 0.91–0.95]; P<0.001; automated: HR, 0.94 [95% CI, 0.92–0.96]; P<0.001) and multivariable analyses (left ventricular EF, manual: HR, 0.95 [95% CI, 0.92–0.98]; P=0.001; automated: HR, 0.95 [95% CI, 0.92–0.98]; P=0.001). Manual correction of the automated contours did not lead to improved risk prediction (left ventricular EF, area under the curve: 0.67 automated versus 0.68 automated corrected; P=0.49). There was acceptable agreement (left ventricular EF: bias, 2.6%; 95% limits of agreement, −9.1% to 14.2%; intraclass correlation coefficient, 0.88 [95% CI, 0.77–0.93]) of manual and automated volumetric assessments. CONCLUSIONS: User‐independent volumetric analyses performed by fully automated software are feasible, and results are equally predictive of major adverse cardiac events compared with conventional analyses in patients following myocardial infarction. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifiers: NCT00712101 and NCT01612312. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-09-02 /pmc/articles/PMC7726968/ /pubmed/32873121 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.120.016612 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Published on behalf of the American Heart Association, Inc., by Wiley. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Original Research
Schuster, Andreas
Lange, Torben
Backhaus, Sören J.
Strohmeyer, Carolin
Boom, Patricia C.
Matz, Jonas
Kowallick, Johannes T.
Lotz, Joachim
Steinmetz, Michael
Kutty, Shelby
Bigalke, Boris
Gutberlet, Matthias
de Waha‐Thiele, Suzanne
Desch, Steffen
Hasenfuß, Gerd
Thiele, Holger
Stiermaier, Thomas
Eitel, Ingo
Fully Automated Cardiac Assessment for Diagnostic and Prognostic Stratification Following Myocardial Infarction
title Fully Automated Cardiac Assessment for Diagnostic and Prognostic Stratification Following Myocardial Infarction
title_full Fully Automated Cardiac Assessment for Diagnostic and Prognostic Stratification Following Myocardial Infarction
title_fullStr Fully Automated Cardiac Assessment for Diagnostic and Prognostic Stratification Following Myocardial Infarction
title_full_unstemmed Fully Automated Cardiac Assessment for Diagnostic and Prognostic Stratification Following Myocardial Infarction
title_short Fully Automated Cardiac Assessment for Diagnostic and Prognostic Stratification Following Myocardial Infarction
title_sort fully automated cardiac assessment for diagnostic and prognostic stratification following myocardial infarction
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7726968/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32873121
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.120.016612
work_keys_str_mv AT schusterandreas fullyautomatedcardiacassessmentfordiagnosticandprognosticstratificationfollowingmyocardialinfarction
AT langetorben fullyautomatedcardiacassessmentfordiagnosticandprognosticstratificationfollowingmyocardialinfarction
AT backhaussorenj fullyautomatedcardiacassessmentfordiagnosticandprognosticstratificationfollowingmyocardialinfarction
AT strohmeyercarolin fullyautomatedcardiacassessmentfordiagnosticandprognosticstratificationfollowingmyocardialinfarction
AT boompatriciac fullyautomatedcardiacassessmentfordiagnosticandprognosticstratificationfollowingmyocardialinfarction
AT matzjonas fullyautomatedcardiacassessmentfordiagnosticandprognosticstratificationfollowingmyocardialinfarction
AT kowallickjohannest fullyautomatedcardiacassessmentfordiagnosticandprognosticstratificationfollowingmyocardialinfarction
AT lotzjoachim fullyautomatedcardiacassessmentfordiagnosticandprognosticstratificationfollowingmyocardialinfarction
AT steinmetzmichael fullyautomatedcardiacassessmentfordiagnosticandprognosticstratificationfollowingmyocardialinfarction
AT kuttyshelby fullyautomatedcardiacassessmentfordiagnosticandprognosticstratificationfollowingmyocardialinfarction
AT bigalkeboris fullyautomatedcardiacassessmentfordiagnosticandprognosticstratificationfollowingmyocardialinfarction
AT gutberletmatthias fullyautomatedcardiacassessmentfordiagnosticandprognosticstratificationfollowingmyocardialinfarction
AT dewahathielesuzanne fullyautomatedcardiacassessmentfordiagnosticandprognosticstratificationfollowingmyocardialinfarction
AT deschsteffen fullyautomatedcardiacassessmentfordiagnosticandprognosticstratificationfollowingmyocardialinfarction
AT hasenfußgerd fullyautomatedcardiacassessmentfordiagnosticandprognosticstratificationfollowingmyocardialinfarction
AT thieleholger fullyautomatedcardiacassessmentfordiagnosticandprognosticstratificationfollowingmyocardialinfarction
AT stiermaierthomas fullyautomatedcardiacassessmentfordiagnosticandprognosticstratificationfollowingmyocardialinfarction
AT eitelingo fullyautomatedcardiacassessmentfordiagnosticandprognosticstratificationfollowingmyocardialinfarction