Cargando…
Fully Automated Cardiac Assessment for Diagnostic and Prognostic Stratification Following Myocardial Infarction
BACKGROUND: Cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging is considered the reference methodology for cardiac morphology and function but requires manual postprocessing. Whether novel artificial intelligence–based automated analyses deliver similar information for risk stratification is unknown. Therefo...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7726968/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32873121 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.120.016612 |
_version_ | 1783620998170411008 |
---|---|
author | Schuster, Andreas Lange, Torben Backhaus, Sören J. Strohmeyer, Carolin Boom, Patricia C. Matz, Jonas Kowallick, Johannes T. Lotz, Joachim Steinmetz, Michael Kutty, Shelby Bigalke, Boris Gutberlet, Matthias de Waha‐Thiele, Suzanne Desch, Steffen Hasenfuß, Gerd Thiele, Holger Stiermaier, Thomas Eitel, Ingo |
author_facet | Schuster, Andreas Lange, Torben Backhaus, Sören J. Strohmeyer, Carolin Boom, Patricia C. Matz, Jonas Kowallick, Johannes T. Lotz, Joachim Steinmetz, Michael Kutty, Shelby Bigalke, Boris Gutberlet, Matthias de Waha‐Thiele, Suzanne Desch, Steffen Hasenfuß, Gerd Thiele, Holger Stiermaier, Thomas Eitel, Ingo |
author_sort | Schuster, Andreas |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging is considered the reference methodology for cardiac morphology and function but requires manual postprocessing. Whether novel artificial intelligence–based automated analyses deliver similar information for risk stratification is unknown. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate feasibility and prognostic implications of artificial intelligence–based, commercially available software analyses. METHODS AND RESULTS: Cardiovascular magnetic resonance data (n=1017 patients) from 2 myocardial infarction multicenter trials were included. Analyses of biventricular parameters including ejection fraction (EF) were manually and automatically assessed using conventional and artificial intelligence–based software. Obtained parameters entered regression analyses for prediction of major adverse cardiac events, defined as death, reinfarction, or congestive heart failure, within 1 year after the acute event. Both manual and uncorrected automated volumetric assessments showed similar impact on outcome in univariate analyses (left ventricular EF, manual: hazard ratio [HR], 0.93 [95% CI 0.91–0.95]; P<0.001; automated: HR, 0.94 [95% CI, 0.92–0.96]; P<0.001) and multivariable analyses (left ventricular EF, manual: HR, 0.95 [95% CI, 0.92–0.98]; P=0.001; automated: HR, 0.95 [95% CI, 0.92–0.98]; P=0.001). Manual correction of the automated contours did not lead to improved risk prediction (left ventricular EF, area under the curve: 0.67 automated versus 0.68 automated corrected; P=0.49). There was acceptable agreement (left ventricular EF: bias, 2.6%; 95% limits of agreement, −9.1% to 14.2%; intraclass correlation coefficient, 0.88 [95% CI, 0.77–0.93]) of manual and automated volumetric assessments. CONCLUSIONS: User‐independent volumetric analyses performed by fully automated software are feasible, and results are equally predictive of major adverse cardiac events compared with conventional analyses in patients following myocardial infarction. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifiers: NCT00712101 and NCT01612312. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7726968 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-77269682020-12-13 Fully Automated Cardiac Assessment for Diagnostic and Prognostic Stratification Following Myocardial Infarction Schuster, Andreas Lange, Torben Backhaus, Sören J. Strohmeyer, Carolin Boom, Patricia C. Matz, Jonas Kowallick, Johannes T. Lotz, Joachim Steinmetz, Michael Kutty, Shelby Bigalke, Boris Gutberlet, Matthias de Waha‐Thiele, Suzanne Desch, Steffen Hasenfuß, Gerd Thiele, Holger Stiermaier, Thomas Eitel, Ingo J Am Heart Assoc Original Research BACKGROUND: Cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging is considered the reference methodology for cardiac morphology and function but requires manual postprocessing. Whether novel artificial intelligence–based automated analyses deliver similar information for risk stratification is unknown. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate feasibility and prognostic implications of artificial intelligence–based, commercially available software analyses. METHODS AND RESULTS: Cardiovascular magnetic resonance data (n=1017 patients) from 2 myocardial infarction multicenter trials were included. Analyses of biventricular parameters including ejection fraction (EF) were manually and automatically assessed using conventional and artificial intelligence–based software. Obtained parameters entered regression analyses for prediction of major adverse cardiac events, defined as death, reinfarction, or congestive heart failure, within 1 year after the acute event. Both manual and uncorrected automated volumetric assessments showed similar impact on outcome in univariate analyses (left ventricular EF, manual: hazard ratio [HR], 0.93 [95% CI 0.91–0.95]; P<0.001; automated: HR, 0.94 [95% CI, 0.92–0.96]; P<0.001) and multivariable analyses (left ventricular EF, manual: HR, 0.95 [95% CI, 0.92–0.98]; P=0.001; automated: HR, 0.95 [95% CI, 0.92–0.98]; P=0.001). Manual correction of the automated contours did not lead to improved risk prediction (left ventricular EF, area under the curve: 0.67 automated versus 0.68 automated corrected; P=0.49). There was acceptable agreement (left ventricular EF: bias, 2.6%; 95% limits of agreement, −9.1% to 14.2%; intraclass correlation coefficient, 0.88 [95% CI, 0.77–0.93]) of manual and automated volumetric assessments. CONCLUSIONS: User‐independent volumetric analyses performed by fully automated software are feasible, and results are equally predictive of major adverse cardiac events compared with conventional analyses in patients following myocardial infarction. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifiers: NCT00712101 and NCT01612312. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-09-02 /pmc/articles/PMC7726968/ /pubmed/32873121 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.120.016612 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Published on behalf of the American Heart Association, Inc., by Wiley. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Schuster, Andreas Lange, Torben Backhaus, Sören J. Strohmeyer, Carolin Boom, Patricia C. Matz, Jonas Kowallick, Johannes T. Lotz, Joachim Steinmetz, Michael Kutty, Shelby Bigalke, Boris Gutberlet, Matthias de Waha‐Thiele, Suzanne Desch, Steffen Hasenfuß, Gerd Thiele, Holger Stiermaier, Thomas Eitel, Ingo Fully Automated Cardiac Assessment for Diagnostic and Prognostic Stratification Following Myocardial Infarction |
title | Fully Automated Cardiac Assessment for Diagnostic and Prognostic Stratification Following Myocardial Infarction |
title_full | Fully Automated Cardiac Assessment for Diagnostic and Prognostic Stratification Following Myocardial Infarction |
title_fullStr | Fully Automated Cardiac Assessment for Diagnostic and Prognostic Stratification Following Myocardial Infarction |
title_full_unstemmed | Fully Automated Cardiac Assessment for Diagnostic and Prognostic Stratification Following Myocardial Infarction |
title_short | Fully Automated Cardiac Assessment for Diagnostic and Prognostic Stratification Following Myocardial Infarction |
title_sort | fully automated cardiac assessment for diagnostic and prognostic stratification following myocardial infarction |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7726968/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32873121 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.120.016612 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT schusterandreas fullyautomatedcardiacassessmentfordiagnosticandprognosticstratificationfollowingmyocardialinfarction AT langetorben fullyautomatedcardiacassessmentfordiagnosticandprognosticstratificationfollowingmyocardialinfarction AT backhaussorenj fullyautomatedcardiacassessmentfordiagnosticandprognosticstratificationfollowingmyocardialinfarction AT strohmeyercarolin fullyautomatedcardiacassessmentfordiagnosticandprognosticstratificationfollowingmyocardialinfarction AT boompatriciac fullyautomatedcardiacassessmentfordiagnosticandprognosticstratificationfollowingmyocardialinfarction AT matzjonas fullyautomatedcardiacassessmentfordiagnosticandprognosticstratificationfollowingmyocardialinfarction AT kowallickjohannest fullyautomatedcardiacassessmentfordiagnosticandprognosticstratificationfollowingmyocardialinfarction AT lotzjoachim fullyautomatedcardiacassessmentfordiagnosticandprognosticstratificationfollowingmyocardialinfarction AT steinmetzmichael fullyautomatedcardiacassessmentfordiagnosticandprognosticstratificationfollowingmyocardialinfarction AT kuttyshelby fullyautomatedcardiacassessmentfordiagnosticandprognosticstratificationfollowingmyocardialinfarction AT bigalkeboris fullyautomatedcardiacassessmentfordiagnosticandprognosticstratificationfollowingmyocardialinfarction AT gutberletmatthias fullyautomatedcardiacassessmentfordiagnosticandprognosticstratificationfollowingmyocardialinfarction AT dewahathielesuzanne fullyautomatedcardiacassessmentfordiagnosticandprognosticstratificationfollowingmyocardialinfarction AT deschsteffen fullyautomatedcardiacassessmentfordiagnosticandprognosticstratificationfollowingmyocardialinfarction AT hasenfußgerd fullyautomatedcardiacassessmentfordiagnosticandprognosticstratificationfollowingmyocardialinfarction AT thieleholger fullyautomatedcardiacassessmentfordiagnosticandprognosticstratificationfollowingmyocardialinfarction AT stiermaierthomas fullyautomatedcardiacassessmentfordiagnosticandprognosticstratificationfollowingmyocardialinfarction AT eitelingo fullyautomatedcardiacassessmentfordiagnosticandprognosticstratificationfollowingmyocardialinfarction |