Cargando…

Analysis of cesarean section rates using Robson ten group classification system in a tertiary teaching hospital, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: a cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND: Cesarean section (CS) is an important indicator of access to, and quality of maternal health services. The World Health Organization recommends the Robson ten group classification system as a global standard for assessing, monitoring and comparing CS rates at all levels. This study aimed...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Abubeker, Ferid A., Gashawbeza, Biruck, Gebre, Thomas Mekuria, Wondafrash, Mekitie, Teklu, Alula M., Degu, Demis, Bekele, Delayehu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7727107/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33298012
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-020-03474-x
_version_ 1783621032036270080
author Abubeker, Ferid A.
Gashawbeza, Biruck
Gebre, Thomas Mekuria
Wondafrash, Mekitie
Teklu, Alula M.
Degu, Demis
Bekele, Delayehu
author_facet Abubeker, Ferid A.
Gashawbeza, Biruck
Gebre, Thomas Mekuria
Wondafrash, Mekitie
Teklu, Alula M.
Degu, Demis
Bekele, Delayehu
author_sort Abubeker, Ferid A.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Cesarean section (CS) is an important indicator of access to, and quality of maternal health services. The World Health Organization recommends the Robson ten group classification system as a global standard for assessing, monitoring and comparing CS rates at all levels. This study aimed to assess the rate of CS and perform an analysis based on Robson classification system. METHODS: A facility-based cross-sectional study was conducted at a tertiary hospital in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Data were collected from medical charts of all women who delivered from January-June 2018. The overall CS rate was calculated then women were categorized into one of the ten Robson groups. Relative size of each group, contribution of each group to the overall CS rate, and CS rate within each group were calculated. RESULTS: A total of 4,200 deliveries were analyzed. Of these 1,459 (34.7%) were CS. The largest contributors to the overall CS rate were Group 10 (19.1%), Group 2 (18.3%), Group 5 (17.1%), and Group 4 (15.8%). There was also a high rate of pre-labor CS in Group 2, Group 4, and Group 10. CONCLUSION: Through implementation of the Robson ten group classification system, we identified the contribution of each group to the overall CS rate as well as the CS rate within each group. Group 10 was the leading contributor to the overall CS rate. This study also revealed a high rate of CS among low-risk groups. These target groups require more in-depth analysis to identify possible modifiable factors and to apply specific interventions to reduce the CS rate. Evaluation of existing management protocols and further studies into indications of CS and outcomes are needed to design tailored strategies and improve outcomes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7727107
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77271072020-12-10 Analysis of cesarean section rates using Robson ten group classification system in a tertiary teaching hospital, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: a cross-sectional study Abubeker, Ferid A. Gashawbeza, Biruck Gebre, Thomas Mekuria Wondafrash, Mekitie Teklu, Alula M. Degu, Demis Bekele, Delayehu BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Research Article BACKGROUND: Cesarean section (CS) is an important indicator of access to, and quality of maternal health services. The World Health Organization recommends the Robson ten group classification system as a global standard for assessing, monitoring and comparing CS rates at all levels. This study aimed to assess the rate of CS and perform an analysis based on Robson classification system. METHODS: A facility-based cross-sectional study was conducted at a tertiary hospital in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Data were collected from medical charts of all women who delivered from January-June 2018. The overall CS rate was calculated then women were categorized into one of the ten Robson groups. Relative size of each group, contribution of each group to the overall CS rate, and CS rate within each group were calculated. RESULTS: A total of 4,200 deliveries were analyzed. Of these 1,459 (34.7%) were CS. The largest contributors to the overall CS rate were Group 10 (19.1%), Group 2 (18.3%), Group 5 (17.1%), and Group 4 (15.8%). There was also a high rate of pre-labor CS in Group 2, Group 4, and Group 10. CONCLUSION: Through implementation of the Robson ten group classification system, we identified the contribution of each group to the overall CS rate as well as the CS rate within each group. Group 10 was the leading contributor to the overall CS rate. This study also revealed a high rate of CS among low-risk groups. These target groups require more in-depth analysis to identify possible modifiable factors and to apply specific interventions to reduce the CS rate. Evaluation of existing management protocols and further studies into indications of CS and outcomes are needed to design tailored strategies and improve outcomes. BioMed Central 2020-12-09 /pmc/articles/PMC7727107/ /pubmed/33298012 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-020-03474-x Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Abubeker, Ferid A.
Gashawbeza, Biruck
Gebre, Thomas Mekuria
Wondafrash, Mekitie
Teklu, Alula M.
Degu, Demis
Bekele, Delayehu
Analysis of cesarean section rates using Robson ten group classification system in a tertiary teaching hospital, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: a cross-sectional study
title Analysis of cesarean section rates using Robson ten group classification system in a tertiary teaching hospital, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: a cross-sectional study
title_full Analysis of cesarean section rates using Robson ten group classification system in a tertiary teaching hospital, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: a cross-sectional study
title_fullStr Analysis of cesarean section rates using Robson ten group classification system in a tertiary teaching hospital, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: a cross-sectional study
title_full_unstemmed Analysis of cesarean section rates using Robson ten group classification system in a tertiary teaching hospital, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: a cross-sectional study
title_short Analysis of cesarean section rates using Robson ten group classification system in a tertiary teaching hospital, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: a cross-sectional study
title_sort analysis of cesarean section rates using robson ten group classification system in a tertiary teaching hospital, addis ababa, ethiopia: a cross-sectional study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7727107/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33298012
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-020-03474-x
work_keys_str_mv AT abubekerferida analysisofcesareansectionratesusingrobsontengroupclassificationsysteminatertiaryteachinghospitaladdisababaethiopiaacrosssectionalstudy
AT gashawbezabiruck analysisofcesareansectionratesusingrobsontengroupclassificationsysteminatertiaryteachinghospitaladdisababaethiopiaacrosssectionalstudy
AT gebrethomasmekuria analysisofcesareansectionratesusingrobsontengroupclassificationsysteminatertiaryteachinghospitaladdisababaethiopiaacrosssectionalstudy
AT wondafrashmekitie analysisofcesareansectionratesusingrobsontengroupclassificationsysteminatertiaryteachinghospitaladdisababaethiopiaacrosssectionalstudy
AT teklualulam analysisofcesareansectionratesusingrobsontengroupclassificationsysteminatertiaryteachinghospitaladdisababaethiopiaacrosssectionalstudy
AT degudemis analysisofcesareansectionratesusingrobsontengroupclassificationsysteminatertiaryteachinghospitaladdisababaethiopiaacrosssectionalstudy
AT bekeledelayehu analysisofcesareansectionratesusingrobsontengroupclassificationsysteminatertiaryteachinghospitaladdisababaethiopiaacrosssectionalstudy