Cargando…
Analysis of cesarean section rates using Robson ten group classification system in a tertiary teaching hospital, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: a cross-sectional study
BACKGROUND: Cesarean section (CS) is an important indicator of access to, and quality of maternal health services. The World Health Organization recommends the Robson ten group classification system as a global standard for assessing, monitoring and comparing CS rates at all levels. This study aimed...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7727107/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33298012 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-020-03474-x |
_version_ | 1783621032036270080 |
---|---|
author | Abubeker, Ferid A. Gashawbeza, Biruck Gebre, Thomas Mekuria Wondafrash, Mekitie Teklu, Alula M. Degu, Demis Bekele, Delayehu |
author_facet | Abubeker, Ferid A. Gashawbeza, Biruck Gebre, Thomas Mekuria Wondafrash, Mekitie Teklu, Alula M. Degu, Demis Bekele, Delayehu |
author_sort | Abubeker, Ferid A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Cesarean section (CS) is an important indicator of access to, and quality of maternal health services. The World Health Organization recommends the Robson ten group classification system as a global standard for assessing, monitoring and comparing CS rates at all levels. This study aimed to assess the rate of CS and perform an analysis based on Robson classification system. METHODS: A facility-based cross-sectional study was conducted at a tertiary hospital in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Data were collected from medical charts of all women who delivered from January-June 2018. The overall CS rate was calculated then women were categorized into one of the ten Robson groups. Relative size of each group, contribution of each group to the overall CS rate, and CS rate within each group were calculated. RESULTS: A total of 4,200 deliveries were analyzed. Of these 1,459 (34.7%) were CS. The largest contributors to the overall CS rate were Group 10 (19.1%), Group 2 (18.3%), Group 5 (17.1%), and Group 4 (15.8%). There was also a high rate of pre-labor CS in Group 2, Group 4, and Group 10. CONCLUSION: Through implementation of the Robson ten group classification system, we identified the contribution of each group to the overall CS rate as well as the CS rate within each group. Group 10 was the leading contributor to the overall CS rate. This study also revealed a high rate of CS among low-risk groups. These target groups require more in-depth analysis to identify possible modifiable factors and to apply specific interventions to reduce the CS rate. Evaluation of existing management protocols and further studies into indications of CS and outcomes are needed to design tailored strategies and improve outcomes. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7727107 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-77271072020-12-10 Analysis of cesarean section rates using Robson ten group classification system in a tertiary teaching hospital, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: a cross-sectional study Abubeker, Ferid A. Gashawbeza, Biruck Gebre, Thomas Mekuria Wondafrash, Mekitie Teklu, Alula M. Degu, Demis Bekele, Delayehu BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Research Article BACKGROUND: Cesarean section (CS) is an important indicator of access to, and quality of maternal health services. The World Health Organization recommends the Robson ten group classification system as a global standard for assessing, monitoring and comparing CS rates at all levels. This study aimed to assess the rate of CS and perform an analysis based on Robson classification system. METHODS: A facility-based cross-sectional study was conducted at a tertiary hospital in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Data were collected from medical charts of all women who delivered from January-June 2018. The overall CS rate was calculated then women were categorized into one of the ten Robson groups. Relative size of each group, contribution of each group to the overall CS rate, and CS rate within each group were calculated. RESULTS: A total of 4,200 deliveries were analyzed. Of these 1,459 (34.7%) were CS. The largest contributors to the overall CS rate were Group 10 (19.1%), Group 2 (18.3%), Group 5 (17.1%), and Group 4 (15.8%). There was also a high rate of pre-labor CS in Group 2, Group 4, and Group 10. CONCLUSION: Through implementation of the Robson ten group classification system, we identified the contribution of each group to the overall CS rate as well as the CS rate within each group. Group 10 was the leading contributor to the overall CS rate. This study also revealed a high rate of CS among low-risk groups. These target groups require more in-depth analysis to identify possible modifiable factors and to apply specific interventions to reduce the CS rate. Evaluation of existing management protocols and further studies into indications of CS and outcomes are needed to design tailored strategies and improve outcomes. BioMed Central 2020-12-09 /pmc/articles/PMC7727107/ /pubmed/33298012 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-020-03474-x Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Abubeker, Ferid A. Gashawbeza, Biruck Gebre, Thomas Mekuria Wondafrash, Mekitie Teklu, Alula M. Degu, Demis Bekele, Delayehu Analysis of cesarean section rates using Robson ten group classification system in a tertiary teaching hospital, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: a cross-sectional study |
title | Analysis of cesarean section rates using Robson ten group classification system in a tertiary teaching hospital, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: a cross-sectional study |
title_full | Analysis of cesarean section rates using Robson ten group classification system in a tertiary teaching hospital, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: a cross-sectional study |
title_fullStr | Analysis of cesarean section rates using Robson ten group classification system in a tertiary teaching hospital, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: a cross-sectional study |
title_full_unstemmed | Analysis of cesarean section rates using Robson ten group classification system in a tertiary teaching hospital, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: a cross-sectional study |
title_short | Analysis of cesarean section rates using Robson ten group classification system in a tertiary teaching hospital, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: a cross-sectional study |
title_sort | analysis of cesarean section rates using robson ten group classification system in a tertiary teaching hospital, addis ababa, ethiopia: a cross-sectional study |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7727107/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33298012 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-020-03474-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT abubekerferida analysisofcesareansectionratesusingrobsontengroupclassificationsysteminatertiaryteachinghospitaladdisababaethiopiaacrosssectionalstudy AT gashawbezabiruck analysisofcesareansectionratesusingrobsontengroupclassificationsysteminatertiaryteachinghospitaladdisababaethiopiaacrosssectionalstudy AT gebrethomasmekuria analysisofcesareansectionratesusingrobsontengroupclassificationsysteminatertiaryteachinghospitaladdisababaethiopiaacrosssectionalstudy AT wondafrashmekitie analysisofcesareansectionratesusingrobsontengroupclassificationsysteminatertiaryteachinghospitaladdisababaethiopiaacrosssectionalstudy AT teklualulam analysisofcesareansectionratesusingrobsontengroupclassificationsysteminatertiaryteachinghospitaladdisababaethiopiaacrosssectionalstudy AT degudemis analysisofcesareansectionratesusingrobsontengroupclassificationsysteminatertiaryteachinghospitaladdisababaethiopiaacrosssectionalstudy AT bekeledelayehu analysisofcesareansectionratesusingrobsontengroupclassificationsysteminatertiaryteachinghospitaladdisababaethiopiaacrosssectionalstudy |