Cargando…

Clinical outcomes of transforaminal endoscopic lateral recess decompression by using the visualized drilled foraminoplasty and visualized reamed foraminoplasty: a comparison study

BACKGROUND: Lateral recess stenosis (LRS) is a common degenerative disease in the elderly. Since the rise of comorbidity is associated with increasing age, transforaminal endoscopic lateral recess decompression (TE-LRD) is advocated. The objective of this study was to compare the clinical outcomes o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wu, Boyu, Xiong, Chengjie, Huang, Biwang, Zhao, Dongdong, Yao, Zhipeng, Yao, Yawei, Xu, Feng, Kang, Hui
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7727179/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33302913
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-020-03849-3
_version_ 1783621048439144448
author Wu, Boyu
Xiong, Chengjie
Huang, Biwang
Zhao, Dongdong
Yao, Zhipeng
Yao, Yawei
Xu, Feng
Kang, Hui
author_facet Wu, Boyu
Xiong, Chengjie
Huang, Biwang
Zhao, Dongdong
Yao, Zhipeng
Yao, Yawei
Xu, Feng
Kang, Hui
author_sort Wu, Boyu
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Lateral recess stenosis (LRS) is a common degenerative disease in the elderly. Since the rise of comorbidity is associated with increasing age, transforaminal endoscopic lateral recess decompression (TE-LRD) is advocated. The objective of this study was to compare the clinical outcomes of TE-LRD in patients with LRS via visualized drilled foraminoplasty (VDF) or visualized reamed foraminoplasty (VRF) technique. METHODS: A total of 45 and 42 consecutive patients with limp or unilateral radiculopathy symptoms underwent TE-LRD using the VDF and VRF technique, respectively. The radiation exposure and operation time, time to return to work, and complications were compared between two groups. Their clinical outcomes were evaluated with the visual analogue scale (VAS) leg pain score, VAS back pain score, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and modified MacNab’s criteria. RESULTS: The average values of radiation exposure and operative time in the VDF group were significantly higher than those in the VRF group (P <  0.05). The postoperative VAS and ODI scores in both groups were significantly improved compared with those before the operation (P <  0.05). In addition, the VAS score of the leg pain and ODI score in the VRF group were significantly lower than those in the VDF group at the 1-week follow-up (P <  0.05). The good-to-excellent rates of the VDF group and VRF group were 88.89 and 90.48%, respectively, whereas the complication occurrence rates were 6.67 and 4.76% in the VDF group and VRF group, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: TE-LRD performed by using VRF technique can be applied to treat LRS safely and effectively with short radiation exposure and operation time. This technique was comparable to the VDF technique with improved VAS leg pain and ODI scores in the short period after the operation. However, potential complications and risks still need to be considered.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7727179
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77271792020-12-11 Clinical outcomes of transforaminal endoscopic lateral recess decompression by using the visualized drilled foraminoplasty and visualized reamed foraminoplasty: a comparison study Wu, Boyu Xiong, Chengjie Huang, Biwang Zhao, Dongdong Yao, Zhipeng Yao, Yawei Xu, Feng Kang, Hui BMC Musculoskelet Disord Research Article BACKGROUND: Lateral recess stenosis (LRS) is a common degenerative disease in the elderly. Since the rise of comorbidity is associated with increasing age, transforaminal endoscopic lateral recess decompression (TE-LRD) is advocated. The objective of this study was to compare the clinical outcomes of TE-LRD in patients with LRS via visualized drilled foraminoplasty (VDF) or visualized reamed foraminoplasty (VRF) technique. METHODS: A total of 45 and 42 consecutive patients with limp or unilateral radiculopathy symptoms underwent TE-LRD using the VDF and VRF technique, respectively. The radiation exposure and operation time, time to return to work, and complications were compared between two groups. Their clinical outcomes were evaluated with the visual analogue scale (VAS) leg pain score, VAS back pain score, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and modified MacNab’s criteria. RESULTS: The average values of radiation exposure and operative time in the VDF group were significantly higher than those in the VRF group (P <  0.05). The postoperative VAS and ODI scores in both groups were significantly improved compared with those before the operation (P <  0.05). In addition, the VAS score of the leg pain and ODI score in the VRF group were significantly lower than those in the VDF group at the 1-week follow-up (P <  0.05). The good-to-excellent rates of the VDF group and VRF group were 88.89 and 90.48%, respectively, whereas the complication occurrence rates were 6.67 and 4.76% in the VDF group and VRF group, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: TE-LRD performed by using VRF technique can be applied to treat LRS safely and effectively with short radiation exposure and operation time. This technique was comparable to the VDF technique with improved VAS leg pain and ODI scores in the short period after the operation. However, potential complications and risks still need to be considered. BioMed Central 2020-12-10 /pmc/articles/PMC7727179/ /pubmed/33302913 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-020-03849-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Wu, Boyu
Xiong, Chengjie
Huang, Biwang
Zhao, Dongdong
Yao, Zhipeng
Yao, Yawei
Xu, Feng
Kang, Hui
Clinical outcomes of transforaminal endoscopic lateral recess decompression by using the visualized drilled foraminoplasty and visualized reamed foraminoplasty: a comparison study
title Clinical outcomes of transforaminal endoscopic lateral recess decompression by using the visualized drilled foraminoplasty and visualized reamed foraminoplasty: a comparison study
title_full Clinical outcomes of transforaminal endoscopic lateral recess decompression by using the visualized drilled foraminoplasty and visualized reamed foraminoplasty: a comparison study
title_fullStr Clinical outcomes of transforaminal endoscopic lateral recess decompression by using the visualized drilled foraminoplasty and visualized reamed foraminoplasty: a comparison study
title_full_unstemmed Clinical outcomes of transforaminal endoscopic lateral recess decompression by using the visualized drilled foraminoplasty and visualized reamed foraminoplasty: a comparison study
title_short Clinical outcomes of transforaminal endoscopic lateral recess decompression by using the visualized drilled foraminoplasty and visualized reamed foraminoplasty: a comparison study
title_sort clinical outcomes of transforaminal endoscopic lateral recess decompression by using the visualized drilled foraminoplasty and visualized reamed foraminoplasty: a comparison study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7727179/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33302913
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-020-03849-3
work_keys_str_mv AT wuboyu clinicaloutcomesoftransforaminalendoscopiclateralrecessdecompressionbyusingthevisualizeddrilledforaminoplastyandvisualizedreamedforaminoplastyacomparisonstudy
AT xiongchengjie clinicaloutcomesoftransforaminalendoscopiclateralrecessdecompressionbyusingthevisualizeddrilledforaminoplastyandvisualizedreamedforaminoplastyacomparisonstudy
AT huangbiwang clinicaloutcomesoftransforaminalendoscopiclateralrecessdecompressionbyusingthevisualizeddrilledforaminoplastyandvisualizedreamedforaminoplastyacomparisonstudy
AT zhaodongdong clinicaloutcomesoftransforaminalendoscopiclateralrecessdecompressionbyusingthevisualizeddrilledforaminoplastyandvisualizedreamedforaminoplastyacomparisonstudy
AT yaozhipeng clinicaloutcomesoftransforaminalendoscopiclateralrecessdecompressionbyusingthevisualizeddrilledforaminoplastyandvisualizedreamedforaminoplastyacomparisonstudy
AT yaoyawei clinicaloutcomesoftransforaminalendoscopiclateralrecessdecompressionbyusingthevisualizeddrilledforaminoplastyandvisualizedreamedforaminoplastyacomparisonstudy
AT xufeng clinicaloutcomesoftransforaminalendoscopiclateralrecessdecompressionbyusingthevisualizeddrilledforaminoplastyandvisualizedreamedforaminoplastyacomparisonstudy
AT kanghui clinicaloutcomesoftransforaminalendoscopiclateralrecessdecompressionbyusingthevisualizeddrilledforaminoplastyandvisualizedreamedforaminoplastyacomparisonstudy