Cargando…
Evaluation of Rapid Sepsityper® protocol and specific MBT-Sepsityper module (Bruker Daltonics) for the rapid diagnosis of bacteremia and fungemia by MALDI-TOF-MS
During bloodstream infections, rapid adaptation of empirical treatment according to the microorganism identified is essential to decrease mortality. The aim of the present study was to assess the microbiological performances of a new rapid version of the Sepsityper® kit (Bruker Daltonics) allowing i...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7727196/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33298064 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12941-020-00403-w |
_version_ | 1783621052330409984 |
---|---|
author | Ponderand, Léa Pavese, Patricia Maubon, Danièle Giraudon, Emmanuelle Girard, Thomas Landelle, Caroline Maurin, Max Caspar, Yvan |
author_facet | Ponderand, Léa Pavese, Patricia Maubon, Danièle Giraudon, Emmanuelle Girard, Thomas Landelle, Caroline Maurin, Max Caspar, Yvan |
author_sort | Ponderand, Léa |
collection | PubMed |
description | During bloodstream infections, rapid adaptation of empirical treatment according to the microorganism identified is essential to decrease mortality. The aim of the present study was to assess the microbiological performances of a new rapid version of the Sepsityper® kit (Bruker Daltonics) allowing identification of bacteria and yeast by MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry directly from positive blood cultures in 10 min and of the specific MBT-Sepsityper module for spectra analysis, designed to increase identification performance. Identification rates were determined prospectively on 350 bacterial and 29 fungal positive blood cultures, and compared to conventional diagnostic method. Our rapid diagnosis strategy (Rapid Sepsityper® protocol: one spot with and one without formic acid extraction step) combined to MBT-Sepsityper module provided 65.4%, 78.9% and 62% reliable identification to the species level of monomicrobial positive blood cultures growing respectively Gram-positive, Gram-negative bacteria or yeast. Importantly, identification rates of Gram-positive bacteria were higher in anaerobic than in aerobic bottles (77.8% vs 22.2%; p = 0.004), if formic acid extraction step was performed (60.8% vs 39.2%; p = 1.8e(−6)) and if specific MBT-Sepsityper module was used (76.2% vs 61.9%, p = 0.041) while no significant differences were observed for Gram-negative bacteria. For yeasts identification, formic acid extraction step improved rapid identification rate by 37.9% while the specific MBT-Sepsityper module increased overall performances by 38%, providing up to 89.7% reliable identification if associated with the standard Sepsityper® protocol. These performances, associated with a reduce turnaround time, may help to implement a rapid identification strategy of bloodstream infections in the routine workflow of microbiology laboratories. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7727196 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-77271962020-12-11 Evaluation of Rapid Sepsityper® protocol and specific MBT-Sepsityper module (Bruker Daltonics) for the rapid diagnosis of bacteremia and fungemia by MALDI-TOF-MS Ponderand, Léa Pavese, Patricia Maubon, Danièle Giraudon, Emmanuelle Girard, Thomas Landelle, Caroline Maurin, Max Caspar, Yvan Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob Research During bloodstream infections, rapid adaptation of empirical treatment according to the microorganism identified is essential to decrease mortality. The aim of the present study was to assess the microbiological performances of a new rapid version of the Sepsityper® kit (Bruker Daltonics) allowing identification of bacteria and yeast by MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry directly from positive blood cultures in 10 min and of the specific MBT-Sepsityper module for spectra analysis, designed to increase identification performance. Identification rates were determined prospectively on 350 bacterial and 29 fungal positive blood cultures, and compared to conventional diagnostic method. Our rapid diagnosis strategy (Rapid Sepsityper® protocol: one spot with and one without formic acid extraction step) combined to MBT-Sepsityper module provided 65.4%, 78.9% and 62% reliable identification to the species level of monomicrobial positive blood cultures growing respectively Gram-positive, Gram-negative bacteria or yeast. Importantly, identification rates of Gram-positive bacteria were higher in anaerobic than in aerobic bottles (77.8% vs 22.2%; p = 0.004), if formic acid extraction step was performed (60.8% vs 39.2%; p = 1.8e(−6)) and if specific MBT-Sepsityper module was used (76.2% vs 61.9%, p = 0.041) while no significant differences were observed for Gram-negative bacteria. For yeasts identification, formic acid extraction step improved rapid identification rate by 37.9% while the specific MBT-Sepsityper module increased overall performances by 38%, providing up to 89.7% reliable identification if associated with the standard Sepsityper® protocol. These performances, associated with a reduce turnaround time, may help to implement a rapid identification strategy of bloodstream infections in the routine workflow of microbiology laboratories. BioMed Central 2020-12-09 /pmc/articles/PMC7727196/ /pubmed/33298064 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12941-020-00403-w Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Ponderand, Léa Pavese, Patricia Maubon, Danièle Giraudon, Emmanuelle Girard, Thomas Landelle, Caroline Maurin, Max Caspar, Yvan Evaluation of Rapid Sepsityper® protocol and specific MBT-Sepsityper module (Bruker Daltonics) for the rapid diagnosis of bacteremia and fungemia by MALDI-TOF-MS |
title | Evaluation of Rapid Sepsityper® protocol and specific MBT-Sepsityper module (Bruker Daltonics) for the rapid diagnosis of bacteremia and fungemia by MALDI-TOF-MS |
title_full | Evaluation of Rapid Sepsityper® protocol and specific MBT-Sepsityper module (Bruker Daltonics) for the rapid diagnosis of bacteremia and fungemia by MALDI-TOF-MS |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of Rapid Sepsityper® protocol and specific MBT-Sepsityper module (Bruker Daltonics) for the rapid diagnosis of bacteremia and fungemia by MALDI-TOF-MS |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of Rapid Sepsityper® protocol and specific MBT-Sepsityper module (Bruker Daltonics) for the rapid diagnosis of bacteremia and fungemia by MALDI-TOF-MS |
title_short | Evaluation of Rapid Sepsityper® protocol and specific MBT-Sepsityper module (Bruker Daltonics) for the rapid diagnosis of bacteremia and fungemia by MALDI-TOF-MS |
title_sort | evaluation of rapid sepsityper® protocol and specific mbt-sepsityper module (bruker daltonics) for the rapid diagnosis of bacteremia and fungemia by maldi-tof-ms |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7727196/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33298064 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12941-020-00403-w |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ponderandlea evaluationofrapidsepsityperprotocolandspecificmbtsepsitypermodulebrukerdaltonicsfortherapiddiagnosisofbacteremiaandfungemiabymalditofms AT pavesepatricia evaluationofrapidsepsityperprotocolandspecificmbtsepsitypermodulebrukerdaltonicsfortherapiddiagnosisofbacteremiaandfungemiabymalditofms AT maubondaniele evaluationofrapidsepsityperprotocolandspecificmbtsepsitypermodulebrukerdaltonicsfortherapiddiagnosisofbacteremiaandfungemiabymalditofms AT giraudonemmanuelle evaluationofrapidsepsityperprotocolandspecificmbtsepsitypermodulebrukerdaltonicsfortherapiddiagnosisofbacteremiaandfungemiabymalditofms AT girardthomas evaluationofrapidsepsityperprotocolandspecificmbtsepsitypermodulebrukerdaltonicsfortherapiddiagnosisofbacteremiaandfungemiabymalditofms AT landellecaroline evaluationofrapidsepsityperprotocolandspecificmbtsepsitypermodulebrukerdaltonicsfortherapiddiagnosisofbacteremiaandfungemiabymalditofms AT maurinmax evaluationofrapidsepsityperprotocolandspecificmbtsepsitypermodulebrukerdaltonicsfortherapiddiagnosisofbacteremiaandfungemiabymalditofms AT casparyvan evaluationofrapidsepsityperprotocolandspecificmbtsepsitypermodulebrukerdaltonicsfortherapiddiagnosisofbacteremiaandfungemiabymalditofms |