Cargando…

Comparison of microcapillary column length and inner diameter investigated with gradient analysis of lipids by ultrahigh‐pressure liquid chromatography‐mass spectrometry

Biological samples in lipidomic studies can consist of extremely complex mixtures due to the diverse range of species and isomerism. Herein, highly efficient, in‐house packed microcapillary columns introduce the potential to better separate these complex mixtures. We compared the effects of changing...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Miller, Kelsey E., Jorgenson, James W.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7727313/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32946185
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jssc.202000545
_version_ 1783621073876549632
author Miller, Kelsey E.
Jorgenson, James W.
author_facet Miller, Kelsey E.
Jorgenson, James W.
author_sort Miller, Kelsey E.
collection PubMed
description Biological samples in lipidomic studies can consist of extremely complex mixtures due to the diverse range of species and isomerism. Herein, highly efficient, in‐house packed microcapillary columns introduce the potential to better separate these complex mixtures. We compared the effects of changing column length (15, 30, and 60 cm) and inner diameter (75 and 100 μm) on lipid separation efficiency by reversed‐phase gradient analysis using ultrahigh‐pressure liquid chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry with operating pressures ranging from 450 to 2200 bar. Seven lipid standards composed of phosphatidylcholine and triacylglycerol species were analyzed at four different gradient rates to calculate conditional peak capacity. The longest column, 60 cm, at the shallowest gradient of 2% gave the highest peak capacity of 359 with a separation window of 2 h. The intermediate column length of 30 cm with 75 μm inner diameter provided a peak capacity of 287 with a separation window of 1 h. There was no significant difference in peak capacity between 75 and 100 μm inner diameter columns. This study showed that using highly efficient microcapillary columns increased peak capacity and resolution of lipids, and thus, this technique seems promising for enhancing lipid coverage and enabling better discovery of lipid biomarkers.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7727313
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77273132020-12-28 Comparison of microcapillary column length and inner diameter investigated with gradient analysis of lipids by ultrahigh‐pressure liquid chromatography‐mass spectrometry Miller, Kelsey E. Jorgenson, James W. J Sep Sci Liquid Chromatography Biological samples in lipidomic studies can consist of extremely complex mixtures due to the diverse range of species and isomerism. Herein, highly efficient, in‐house packed microcapillary columns introduce the potential to better separate these complex mixtures. We compared the effects of changing column length (15, 30, and 60 cm) and inner diameter (75 and 100 μm) on lipid separation efficiency by reversed‐phase gradient analysis using ultrahigh‐pressure liquid chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry with operating pressures ranging from 450 to 2200 bar. Seven lipid standards composed of phosphatidylcholine and triacylglycerol species were analyzed at four different gradient rates to calculate conditional peak capacity. The longest column, 60 cm, at the shallowest gradient of 2% gave the highest peak capacity of 359 with a separation window of 2 h. The intermediate column length of 30 cm with 75 μm inner diameter provided a peak capacity of 287 with a separation window of 1 h. There was no significant difference in peak capacity between 75 and 100 μm inner diameter columns. This study showed that using highly efficient microcapillary columns increased peak capacity and resolution of lipids, and thus, this technique seems promising for enhancing lipid coverage and enabling better discovery of lipid biomarkers. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-10-07 2020-11 /pmc/articles/PMC7727313/ /pubmed/32946185 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jssc.202000545 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Journal of Separation Science published by Wiley‐VCH GmbH This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Liquid Chromatography
Miller, Kelsey E.
Jorgenson, James W.
Comparison of microcapillary column length and inner diameter investigated with gradient analysis of lipids by ultrahigh‐pressure liquid chromatography‐mass spectrometry
title Comparison of microcapillary column length and inner diameter investigated with gradient analysis of lipids by ultrahigh‐pressure liquid chromatography‐mass spectrometry
title_full Comparison of microcapillary column length and inner diameter investigated with gradient analysis of lipids by ultrahigh‐pressure liquid chromatography‐mass spectrometry
title_fullStr Comparison of microcapillary column length and inner diameter investigated with gradient analysis of lipids by ultrahigh‐pressure liquid chromatography‐mass spectrometry
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of microcapillary column length and inner diameter investigated with gradient analysis of lipids by ultrahigh‐pressure liquid chromatography‐mass spectrometry
title_short Comparison of microcapillary column length and inner diameter investigated with gradient analysis of lipids by ultrahigh‐pressure liquid chromatography‐mass spectrometry
title_sort comparison of microcapillary column length and inner diameter investigated with gradient analysis of lipids by ultrahigh‐pressure liquid chromatography‐mass spectrometry
topic Liquid Chromatography
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7727313/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32946185
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jssc.202000545
work_keys_str_mv AT millerkelseye comparisonofmicrocapillarycolumnlengthandinnerdiameterinvestigatedwithgradientanalysisoflipidsbyultrahighpressureliquidchromatographymassspectrometry
AT jorgensonjamesw comparisonofmicrocapillarycolumnlengthandinnerdiameterinvestigatedwithgradientanalysisoflipidsbyultrahighpressureliquidchromatographymassspectrometry