Cargando…

Developing and validating the Psychosocial Burden among people Seeking Abortion Scale (PB-SAS)

While there is a large body of research demonstrating that having an abortion is not associated with adverse mental health outcomes, less research has examined which factors may contribute to elevated levels of mental health symptoms at the time of abortion seeking. This study aims to develop and va...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Biggs, M. Antonia, Neilands, Torsten B., Kaller, Shelly, Wingo, Erin, Ralph, Lauren J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7728247/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33301480
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0242463
_version_ 1783621233760272384
author Biggs, M. Antonia
Neilands, Torsten B.
Kaller, Shelly
Wingo, Erin
Ralph, Lauren J.
author_facet Biggs, M. Antonia
Neilands, Torsten B.
Kaller, Shelly
Wingo, Erin
Ralph, Lauren J.
author_sort Biggs, M. Antonia
collection PubMed
description While there is a large body of research demonstrating that having an abortion is not associated with adverse mental health outcomes, less research has examined which factors may contribute to elevated levels of mental health symptoms at the time of abortion seeking. This study aims to develop and validate a new tool to measure dimensions of psychosocial burden experienced by people seeking abortion in the United States. To develop scale items, we reviewed the literature including existing measures of stress and anxiety and conducted interviews with experts in abortion care and with patients seeking abortion. Thirty-five items were administered to 784 people seeking abortion at four facilities located in three U.S. states. We used exploratory factor analysis (EFA) to reduce items and identify key domains of psychosocial burden. We assessed the predictive validity of the overall scale and each sub-scale, by assessing their associations with validated measures of perceived stress, anxiety, and depression using multivariable linear regression models. Factor analyses revealed a 12-item factor solution measuring psychosocial burden seeking abortion, with four subdomains: structural challenges, pregnancy decision-making, lack of autonomy, and others’ reactions to the pregnancy. The alpha reliability coefficients were acceptable for the overall scale (α = 0.83) and each subscale (ranging from α = 0.82–0.85). In adjusted analyses, the overall scale was significantly associated with stress, anxiety and depression; each subscale was also significantly associated with each mental health outcome. This new scale offers a practical tool for providers and researchers to empirically document the factors associated with people’s psychological well-being at the time of seeking an abortion. Findings suggest that the same restrictions that claim to protect people from mental health harm may be increasing people’s psychosocial burden and contributing to adverse psychological outcomes at the time of seeking abortion.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7728247
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77282472020-12-17 Developing and validating the Psychosocial Burden among people Seeking Abortion Scale (PB-SAS) Biggs, M. Antonia Neilands, Torsten B. Kaller, Shelly Wingo, Erin Ralph, Lauren J. PLoS One Research Article While there is a large body of research demonstrating that having an abortion is not associated with adverse mental health outcomes, less research has examined which factors may contribute to elevated levels of mental health symptoms at the time of abortion seeking. This study aims to develop and validate a new tool to measure dimensions of psychosocial burden experienced by people seeking abortion in the United States. To develop scale items, we reviewed the literature including existing measures of stress and anxiety and conducted interviews with experts in abortion care and with patients seeking abortion. Thirty-five items were administered to 784 people seeking abortion at four facilities located in three U.S. states. We used exploratory factor analysis (EFA) to reduce items and identify key domains of psychosocial burden. We assessed the predictive validity of the overall scale and each sub-scale, by assessing their associations with validated measures of perceived stress, anxiety, and depression using multivariable linear regression models. Factor analyses revealed a 12-item factor solution measuring psychosocial burden seeking abortion, with four subdomains: structural challenges, pregnancy decision-making, lack of autonomy, and others’ reactions to the pregnancy. The alpha reliability coefficients were acceptable for the overall scale (α = 0.83) and each subscale (ranging from α = 0.82–0.85). In adjusted analyses, the overall scale was significantly associated with stress, anxiety and depression; each subscale was also significantly associated with each mental health outcome. This new scale offers a practical tool for providers and researchers to empirically document the factors associated with people’s psychological well-being at the time of seeking an abortion. Findings suggest that the same restrictions that claim to protect people from mental health harm may be increasing people’s psychosocial burden and contributing to adverse psychological outcomes at the time of seeking abortion. Public Library of Science 2020-12-10 /pmc/articles/PMC7728247/ /pubmed/33301480 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0242463 Text en © 2020 Biggs et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Biggs, M. Antonia
Neilands, Torsten B.
Kaller, Shelly
Wingo, Erin
Ralph, Lauren J.
Developing and validating the Psychosocial Burden among people Seeking Abortion Scale (PB-SAS)
title Developing and validating the Psychosocial Burden among people Seeking Abortion Scale (PB-SAS)
title_full Developing and validating the Psychosocial Burden among people Seeking Abortion Scale (PB-SAS)
title_fullStr Developing and validating the Psychosocial Burden among people Seeking Abortion Scale (PB-SAS)
title_full_unstemmed Developing and validating the Psychosocial Burden among people Seeking Abortion Scale (PB-SAS)
title_short Developing and validating the Psychosocial Burden among people Seeking Abortion Scale (PB-SAS)
title_sort developing and validating the psychosocial burden among people seeking abortion scale (pb-sas)
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7728247/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33301480
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0242463
work_keys_str_mv AT biggsmantonia developingandvalidatingthepsychosocialburdenamongpeopleseekingabortionscalepbsas
AT neilandstorstenb developingandvalidatingthepsychosocialburdenamongpeopleseekingabortionscalepbsas
AT kallershelly developingandvalidatingthepsychosocialburdenamongpeopleseekingabortionscalepbsas
AT wingoerin developingandvalidatingthepsychosocialburdenamongpeopleseekingabortionscalepbsas
AT ralphlaurenj developingandvalidatingthepsychosocialburdenamongpeopleseekingabortionscalepbsas