Cargando…

Efficacy and harms of remdesivir for the treatment of COVID-19: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: Efficacy and safety of treatments for hospitalized COVID-19 are uncertain. We systematically reviewed efficacy and safety of remdesivir for the treatment of COVID-19. METHODS: Studies evaluating remdesivir in adults with hospitalized COVID-19 were searched in several engines until August...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Piscoya, Alejandro, Ng-Sueng, Luis F., Parra del Riego, Angela, Cerna-Viacava, Renato, Pasupuleti, Vinay, Roman, Yuani M., Thota, Priyaleela, White, C. Michael, Hernandez, Adrian V.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7728272/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33301514
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0243705
_version_ 1783621239828381696
author Piscoya, Alejandro
Ng-Sueng, Luis F.
Parra del Riego, Angela
Cerna-Viacava, Renato
Pasupuleti, Vinay
Roman, Yuani M.
Thota, Priyaleela
White, C. Michael
Hernandez, Adrian V.
author_facet Piscoya, Alejandro
Ng-Sueng, Luis F.
Parra del Riego, Angela
Cerna-Viacava, Renato
Pasupuleti, Vinay
Roman, Yuani M.
Thota, Priyaleela
White, C. Michael
Hernandez, Adrian V.
author_sort Piscoya, Alejandro
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Efficacy and safety of treatments for hospitalized COVID-19 are uncertain. We systematically reviewed efficacy and safety of remdesivir for the treatment of COVID-19. METHODS: Studies evaluating remdesivir in adults with hospitalized COVID-19 were searched in several engines until August 21, 2020. Primary outcomes included all-cause mortality, clinical improvement or recovery, need for invasive ventilation, and serious adverse events (SAEs). Inverse variance random effects meta-analyses were performed. RESULTS: We included four randomized controlled trials (RCTs) (n = 2296) [two vs. placebo (n = 1299) and two comparing 5-day vs. 10-day regimens (n = 997)], and two case series (n = 88). Studies used intravenous remdesivir 200mg the first day and 100mg for four or nine more days. One RCT (n = 236) was stopped early due to AEs; the other three RCTs reported outcomes between 11 and 15 days. Time to recovery was decreased by 4 days with remdesivir vs. placebo in one RCT (n = 1063), and by 0.8 days with 5-days vs. 10-days of therapy in another RCT (n = 397). Clinical improvement was better for 5-days regimen vs. standard of care in one RCT (n = 600). Remdesivir did not decrease all-cause mortality (RR 0.71, 95%CI 0.39 to 1.28, I(2) = 43%) and need for invasive ventilation (RR 0.57, 95%CI 0.23 to 1.42, I(2) = 60%) vs. placebo at 14 days but had fewer SAEs; 5-day decreased need for invasive ventilation and SAEs vs. 10-day in one RCT (n = 397). No differences in all-cause mortality or SAEs were seen among 5-day, 10-day and standard of care. There were some concerns of bias to high risk of bias in RCTs. Heterogeneity between studies could be due to different severities of disease, days of therapy before outcome determination, and how ordinal data was analyzed. CONCLUSIONS: There is paucity of adequately powered and fully reported RCTs evaluating effects of remdesivir in hospitalized COVID-19 patients. Until stronger evidence emerges, we cannot conclude that remdesivir is efficacious for treating COVID-19.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7728272
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77282722020-12-17 Efficacy and harms of remdesivir for the treatment of COVID-19: A systematic review and meta-analysis Piscoya, Alejandro Ng-Sueng, Luis F. Parra del Riego, Angela Cerna-Viacava, Renato Pasupuleti, Vinay Roman, Yuani M. Thota, Priyaleela White, C. Michael Hernandez, Adrian V. PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Efficacy and safety of treatments for hospitalized COVID-19 are uncertain. We systematically reviewed efficacy and safety of remdesivir for the treatment of COVID-19. METHODS: Studies evaluating remdesivir in adults with hospitalized COVID-19 were searched in several engines until August 21, 2020. Primary outcomes included all-cause mortality, clinical improvement or recovery, need for invasive ventilation, and serious adverse events (SAEs). Inverse variance random effects meta-analyses were performed. RESULTS: We included four randomized controlled trials (RCTs) (n = 2296) [two vs. placebo (n = 1299) and two comparing 5-day vs. 10-day regimens (n = 997)], and two case series (n = 88). Studies used intravenous remdesivir 200mg the first day and 100mg for four or nine more days. One RCT (n = 236) was stopped early due to AEs; the other three RCTs reported outcomes between 11 and 15 days. Time to recovery was decreased by 4 days with remdesivir vs. placebo in one RCT (n = 1063), and by 0.8 days with 5-days vs. 10-days of therapy in another RCT (n = 397). Clinical improvement was better for 5-days regimen vs. standard of care in one RCT (n = 600). Remdesivir did not decrease all-cause mortality (RR 0.71, 95%CI 0.39 to 1.28, I(2) = 43%) and need for invasive ventilation (RR 0.57, 95%CI 0.23 to 1.42, I(2) = 60%) vs. placebo at 14 days but had fewer SAEs; 5-day decreased need for invasive ventilation and SAEs vs. 10-day in one RCT (n = 397). No differences in all-cause mortality or SAEs were seen among 5-day, 10-day and standard of care. There were some concerns of bias to high risk of bias in RCTs. Heterogeneity between studies could be due to different severities of disease, days of therapy before outcome determination, and how ordinal data was analyzed. CONCLUSIONS: There is paucity of adequately powered and fully reported RCTs evaluating effects of remdesivir in hospitalized COVID-19 patients. Until stronger evidence emerges, we cannot conclude that remdesivir is efficacious for treating COVID-19. Public Library of Science 2020-12-10 /pmc/articles/PMC7728272/ /pubmed/33301514 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0243705 Text en © 2020 Piscoya et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Piscoya, Alejandro
Ng-Sueng, Luis F.
Parra del Riego, Angela
Cerna-Viacava, Renato
Pasupuleti, Vinay
Roman, Yuani M.
Thota, Priyaleela
White, C. Michael
Hernandez, Adrian V.
Efficacy and harms of remdesivir for the treatment of COVID-19: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title Efficacy and harms of remdesivir for the treatment of COVID-19: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Efficacy and harms of remdesivir for the treatment of COVID-19: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Efficacy and harms of remdesivir for the treatment of COVID-19: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy and harms of remdesivir for the treatment of COVID-19: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Efficacy and harms of remdesivir for the treatment of COVID-19: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort efficacy and harms of remdesivir for the treatment of covid-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7728272/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33301514
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0243705
work_keys_str_mv AT piscoyaalejandro efficacyandharmsofremdesivirforthetreatmentofcovid19asystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT ngsuengluisf efficacyandharmsofremdesivirforthetreatmentofcovid19asystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT parradelriegoangela efficacyandharmsofremdesivirforthetreatmentofcovid19asystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT cernaviacavarenato efficacyandharmsofremdesivirforthetreatmentofcovid19asystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT pasupuletivinay efficacyandharmsofremdesivirforthetreatmentofcovid19asystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT romanyuanim efficacyandharmsofremdesivirforthetreatmentofcovid19asystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT thotapriyaleela efficacyandharmsofremdesivirforthetreatmentofcovid19asystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT whitecmichael efficacyandharmsofremdesivirforthetreatmentofcovid19asystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT hernandezadrianv efficacyandharmsofremdesivirforthetreatmentofcovid19asystematicreviewandmetaanalysis