Cargando…

Potential Benefits and Drawbacks of Virtual Clinics in General Surgery: Pilot Cross-Sectional Questionnaire Study

BACKGROUND: Escalating demand for specialist health care puts considerable demand on hospital services. Technology offers a means by which health care providers may increase the efficiency of health care delivery. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to conduct a pilot study of the feasibility, bene...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rutherford, Emily, Noray, Roghinio, Ó hEarráin, Caolán, Quinlan, Kevin, Hegarty, Aisling, Ekpotu, Lenin, Arize, Chinedum, Fabamwo, Fiyinfoluwa, Alrubaiaan, Abdulaziz, Bhupalan, Avinash, Alshehhi, Abdulla, Power, Colm, Hill, Arnold David Konrad
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: JMIR Publications 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7728406/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33932277
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/12491
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Escalating demand for specialist health care puts considerable demand on hospital services. Technology offers a means by which health care providers may increase the efficiency of health care delivery. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to conduct a pilot study of the feasibility, benefits, and drawbacks of a virtual clinic (VC) in the general surgical service of a busy tertiary center. METHODS: Patient satisfaction with current care and attitudes to VC were surveyed prospectively in the general surgical outpatient department (OPD; n=223). A subset of patients who had undergone endoscopy and day surgery were recruited to follow-up in a VC and subsequently surveyed with regard to their satisfaction (20/243). Other outcomes measured included a comparison of consultation times in traditional and virtual outpatient settings and financial cost to both patients and the institution. RESULTS: Almost half of the patients reported barriers to prospective use of VCs. However, within the cohort who had been followed-up in the VC, satisfaction was higher than the traditional OPD (100% as compared with 187/223, 83.9%). Significant savings in both time (P=.003) and financial costs to patients and the institution were found. CONCLUSIONS: For an appropriately selected group of patients, VCs offer a viable alternative to traditional OPD. This alternative can improve both patient satisfaction and efficiency of patient care.