Cargando…

3D Bioprinting and the Future of Surgery

Introduction: The disciplines of 3D bioprinting and surgery have witnessed incremental transformations over the last century. 3D bioprinting is a convergence of biology and engineering technologies, mirroring the clinical need to produce viable biological tissue through advancements in printing, reg...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jovic, Thomas H., Combellack, Emman J., Jessop, Zita M., Whitaker, Iain S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7728666/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33330613
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2020.609836
_version_ 1783621321145450496
author Jovic, Thomas H.
Combellack, Emman J.
Jessop, Zita M.
Whitaker, Iain S.
author_facet Jovic, Thomas H.
Combellack, Emman J.
Jessop, Zita M.
Whitaker, Iain S.
author_sort Jovic, Thomas H.
collection PubMed
description Introduction: The disciplines of 3D bioprinting and surgery have witnessed incremental transformations over the last century. 3D bioprinting is a convergence of biology and engineering technologies, mirroring the clinical need to produce viable biological tissue through advancements in printing, regenerative medicine and materials science. To outline the current and future challenges of 3D bioprinting technology in surgery. Methods: A comprehensive literature search was undertaken using the MEDLINE, EMBASE and Google Scholar databases between 2000 and 2019. A narrative synthesis of the resulting literature was produced to discuss 3D bioprinting, current and future challenges, the role in personalized medicine and transplantation surgery and the global 3D bioprinting market. Results: The next 20 years will see the advent of bioprinted implants for surgical use, however the path to clinical incorporation will be fraught with an array of ethical, regulatory and technical challenges of which each must be surmounted. Previous clinical cases where regulatory processes have been bypassed have led to poor outcomes and controversy. Speculated roles of 3D bioprinting in surgery include the production of de novo organs for transplantation and use of autologous cellular material for personalized medicine. The promise of these technologies has sparked an industrial revolution, leading to an exponential growth of the 3D bioprinting market worth billions of dollars. Conclusion: Effective translation requires the input of scientists, engineers, clinicians, and regulatory bodies: there is a need for a collaborative effort to translate this impactful technology into a real-world healthcare setting and potentially transform the future of surgery.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7728666
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77286662020-12-15 3D Bioprinting and the Future of Surgery Jovic, Thomas H. Combellack, Emman J. Jessop, Zita M. Whitaker, Iain S. Front Surg Surgery Introduction: The disciplines of 3D bioprinting and surgery have witnessed incremental transformations over the last century. 3D bioprinting is a convergence of biology and engineering technologies, mirroring the clinical need to produce viable biological tissue through advancements in printing, regenerative medicine and materials science. To outline the current and future challenges of 3D bioprinting technology in surgery. Methods: A comprehensive literature search was undertaken using the MEDLINE, EMBASE and Google Scholar databases between 2000 and 2019. A narrative synthesis of the resulting literature was produced to discuss 3D bioprinting, current and future challenges, the role in personalized medicine and transplantation surgery and the global 3D bioprinting market. Results: The next 20 years will see the advent of bioprinted implants for surgical use, however the path to clinical incorporation will be fraught with an array of ethical, regulatory and technical challenges of which each must be surmounted. Previous clinical cases where regulatory processes have been bypassed have led to poor outcomes and controversy. Speculated roles of 3D bioprinting in surgery include the production of de novo organs for transplantation and use of autologous cellular material for personalized medicine. The promise of these technologies has sparked an industrial revolution, leading to an exponential growth of the 3D bioprinting market worth billions of dollars. Conclusion: Effective translation requires the input of scientists, engineers, clinicians, and regulatory bodies: there is a need for a collaborative effort to translate this impactful technology into a real-world healthcare setting and potentially transform the future of surgery. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-11-27 /pmc/articles/PMC7728666/ /pubmed/33330613 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2020.609836 Text en Copyright © 2020 Jovic, Combellack, Jessop and Whitaker. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Surgery
Jovic, Thomas H.
Combellack, Emman J.
Jessop, Zita M.
Whitaker, Iain S.
3D Bioprinting and the Future of Surgery
title 3D Bioprinting and the Future of Surgery
title_full 3D Bioprinting and the Future of Surgery
title_fullStr 3D Bioprinting and the Future of Surgery
title_full_unstemmed 3D Bioprinting and the Future of Surgery
title_short 3D Bioprinting and the Future of Surgery
title_sort 3d bioprinting and the future of surgery
topic Surgery
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7728666/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33330613
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2020.609836
work_keys_str_mv AT jovicthomash 3dbioprintingandthefutureofsurgery
AT combellackemmanj 3dbioprintingandthefutureofsurgery
AT jessopzitam 3dbioprintingandthefutureofsurgery
AT whitakeriains 3dbioprintingandthefutureofsurgery