Cargando…
Reconsidering reviews: the role of scoping reviews in digital medicine and pediatrics
Digital health is a rapidly developing field which is positioned to transform the manner in which healthcare is delivered, especially amongst adolescents and young adults. In order to assess the efficacy of novel medical devices, clinicians and researchers often turn to the literature for guidance....
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7728770/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33303889 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41746-020-00368-2 |
_version_ | 1783621342296276992 |
---|---|
author | Lewinter, Katherine E. Hudson, Sharon M. Kysh, Lynn Lara, Marielena Betz, Cecily L. Espinoza, Juan |
author_facet | Lewinter, Katherine E. Hudson, Sharon M. Kysh, Lynn Lara, Marielena Betz, Cecily L. Espinoza, Juan |
author_sort | Lewinter, Katherine E. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Digital health is a rapidly developing field which is positioned to transform the manner in which healthcare is delivered, especially amongst adolescents and young adults. In order to assess the efficacy of novel medical devices, clinicians and researchers often turn to the literature for guidance. Randomized control trials and the systematic reviews and meta-analyses that they inform are considered to be at the top of the evidence hierarchy. While they are excellent tools to identify and to summarize the best available evidence to answer a specific research question, they are poorly equipped to provide a more expansive understanding of the body of relevant literature in a timely manner. In this letter we discuss the utility of the scoping review, an underutilized style of academic writing designed to map key concepts in a body of literature. This method is ideal when reporting on the fast-paced field of digital medicine, as it allows for rapid synthesis of the available literature. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7728770 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-77287702020-12-17 Reconsidering reviews: the role of scoping reviews in digital medicine and pediatrics Lewinter, Katherine E. Hudson, Sharon M. Kysh, Lynn Lara, Marielena Betz, Cecily L. Espinoza, Juan NPJ Digit Med Comment Digital health is a rapidly developing field which is positioned to transform the manner in which healthcare is delivered, especially amongst adolescents and young adults. In order to assess the efficacy of novel medical devices, clinicians and researchers often turn to the literature for guidance. Randomized control trials and the systematic reviews and meta-analyses that they inform are considered to be at the top of the evidence hierarchy. While they are excellent tools to identify and to summarize the best available evidence to answer a specific research question, they are poorly equipped to provide a more expansive understanding of the body of relevant literature in a timely manner. In this letter we discuss the utility of the scoping review, an underutilized style of academic writing designed to map key concepts in a body of literature. This method is ideal when reporting on the fast-paced field of digital medicine, as it allows for rapid synthesis of the available literature. Nature Publishing Group UK 2020-12-10 /pmc/articles/PMC7728770/ /pubmed/33303889 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41746-020-00368-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Comment Lewinter, Katherine E. Hudson, Sharon M. Kysh, Lynn Lara, Marielena Betz, Cecily L. Espinoza, Juan Reconsidering reviews: the role of scoping reviews in digital medicine and pediatrics |
title | Reconsidering reviews: the role of scoping reviews in digital medicine and pediatrics |
title_full | Reconsidering reviews: the role of scoping reviews in digital medicine and pediatrics |
title_fullStr | Reconsidering reviews: the role of scoping reviews in digital medicine and pediatrics |
title_full_unstemmed | Reconsidering reviews: the role of scoping reviews in digital medicine and pediatrics |
title_short | Reconsidering reviews: the role of scoping reviews in digital medicine and pediatrics |
title_sort | reconsidering reviews: the role of scoping reviews in digital medicine and pediatrics |
topic | Comment |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7728770/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33303889 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41746-020-00368-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lewinterkatherinee reconsideringreviewstheroleofscopingreviewsindigitalmedicineandpediatrics AT hudsonsharonm reconsideringreviewstheroleofscopingreviewsindigitalmedicineandpediatrics AT kyshlynn reconsideringreviewstheroleofscopingreviewsindigitalmedicineandpediatrics AT laramarielena reconsideringreviewstheroleofscopingreviewsindigitalmedicineandpediatrics AT betzcecilyl reconsideringreviewstheroleofscopingreviewsindigitalmedicineandpediatrics AT espinozajuan reconsideringreviewstheroleofscopingreviewsindigitalmedicineandpediatrics |