Cargando…
Establishing a common metric for patient-reported outcomes in cancer patients: linking patient reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS), numerical rating scale, and patient-reported outcomes version of the common terminology criteria for adverse events (PRO-CTCAE)
BACKGROUND: Researchers and clinicians studying symptoms experienced by people with cancer must choose from various scales. It would be useful to know how the scores on one measure translate to another. METHODS: Using item response theory (IRT) with the single-group design, in which the same sample...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7728866/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33305344 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41687-020-00271-0 |
_version_ | 1783621360452370432 |
---|---|
author | Lee, Minji K. Schalet, Benjamin D. Cella, David Yost, Kathleen J. Dueck, Amylou C. Novotny, Paul J. Sloan, Jeff A. |
author_facet | Lee, Minji K. Schalet, Benjamin D. Cella, David Yost, Kathleen J. Dueck, Amylou C. Novotny, Paul J. Sloan, Jeff A. |
author_sort | Lee, Minji K. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Researchers and clinicians studying symptoms experienced by people with cancer must choose from various scales. It would be useful to know how the scores on one measure translate to another. METHODS: Using item response theory (IRT) with the single-group design, in which the same sample answers all measures, we produced crosswalk tables linking five 0–10 numeric rating scale (NRS) and 15 items from Patient-Reported Outcomes version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE, scored on a 1–5 scale) to the T-Score metric of six different scales from the NIH Patient reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS®). The constructs, for which we conducted linking, include emotional distress-anxiety, emotional distress-depression, fatigue, sleep disturbance, pain intensity, and pain interference. We tested the IRT linking assumption of construct similarity between measures by comparing item content and testing unidimensionality of item sets comprising each construct. We also investigated the correlation of the measures to be linked and, by inspecting standardized mean differences, whether the linkage is invariant across age and gender subgroups. For measures that satisfied the assumptions, we conducted linking. RESULTS: In general, an NRS score of 0 corresponded to about 38.2 on the PROMIS T-Score scale (mean = 50; SD = 10); whereas an NRS score of 10 corresponded to a PROMIS T-Score of approximately 72.7. Similarly, the lowest/best score of 1 on PRO-CTCAE corresponded to 39.8 on T-score scale and the highest/worst score of 5 corresponded to 72.0. CONCLUSION: We produced robust linking between single item symptom measures and PROMIS short forms. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s41687-020-00271-0. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7728866 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-77288662020-12-17 Establishing a common metric for patient-reported outcomes in cancer patients: linking patient reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS), numerical rating scale, and patient-reported outcomes version of the common terminology criteria for adverse events (PRO-CTCAE) Lee, Minji K. Schalet, Benjamin D. Cella, David Yost, Kathleen J. Dueck, Amylou C. Novotny, Paul J. Sloan, Jeff A. J Patient Rep Outcomes Research BACKGROUND: Researchers and clinicians studying symptoms experienced by people with cancer must choose from various scales. It would be useful to know how the scores on one measure translate to another. METHODS: Using item response theory (IRT) with the single-group design, in which the same sample answers all measures, we produced crosswalk tables linking five 0–10 numeric rating scale (NRS) and 15 items from Patient-Reported Outcomes version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE, scored on a 1–5 scale) to the T-Score metric of six different scales from the NIH Patient reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS®). The constructs, for which we conducted linking, include emotional distress-anxiety, emotional distress-depression, fatigue, sleep disturbance, pain intensity, and pain interference. We tested the IRT linking assumption of construct similarity between measures by comparing item content and testing unidimensionality of item sets comprising each construct. We also investigated the correlation of the measures to be linked and, by inspecting standardized mean differences, whether the linkage is invariant across age and gender subgroups. For measures that satisfied the assumptions, we conducted linking. RESULTS: In general, an NRS score of 0 corresponded to about 38.2 on the PROMIS T-Score scale (mean = 50; SD = 10); whereas an NRS score of 10 corresponded to a PROMIS T-Score of approximately 72.7. Similarly, the lowest/best score of 1 on PRO-CTCAE corresponded to 39.8 on T-score scale and the highest/worst score of 5 corresponded to 72.0. CONCLUSION: We produced robust linking between single item symptom measures and PROMIS short forms. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s41687-020-00271-0. Springer International Publishing 2020-12-10 /pmc/articles/PMC7728866/ /pubmed/33305344 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41687-020-00271-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2020, corrected publication 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Research Lee, Minji K. Schalet, Benjamin D. Cella, David Yost, Kathleen J. Dueck, Amylou C. Novotny, Paul J. Sloan, Jeff A. Establishing a common metric for patient-reported outcomes in cancer patients: linking patient reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS), numerical rating scale, and patient-reported outcomes version of the common terminology criteria for adverse events (PRO-CTCAE) |
title | Establishing a common metric for patient-reported outcomes in cancer patients: linking patient reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS), numerical rating scale, and patient-reported outcomes version of the common terminology criteria for adverse events (PRO-CTCAE) |
title_full | Establishing a common metric for patient-reported outcomes in cancer patients: linking patient reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS), numerical rating scale, and patient-reported outcomes version of the common terminology criteria for adverse events (PRO-CTCAE) |
title_fullStr | Establishing a common metric for patient-reported outcomes in cancer patients: linking patient reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS), numerical rating scale, and patient-reported outcomes version of the common terminology criteria for adverse events (PRO-CTCAE) |
title_full_unstemmed | Establishing a common metric for patient-reported outcomes in cancer patients: linking patient reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS), numerical rating scale, and patient-reported outcomes version of the common terminology criteria for adverse events (PRO-CTCAE) |
title_short | Establishing a common metric for patient-reported outcomes in cancer patients: linking patient reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS), numerical rating scale, and patient-reported outcomes version of the common terminology criteria for adverse events (PRO-CTCAE) |
title_sort | establishing a common metric for patient-reported outcomes in cancer patients: linking patient reported outcomes measurement information system (promis), numerical rating scale, and patient-reported outcomes version of the common terminology criteria for adverse events (pro-ctcae) |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7728866/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33305344 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41687-020-00271-0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT leeminjik establishingacommonmetricforpatientreportedoutcomesincancerpatientslinkingpatientreportedoutcomesmeasurementinformationsystempromisnumericalratingscaleandpatientreportedoutcomesversionofthecommonterminologycriteriaforadverseeventsproctcae AT schaletbenjamind establishingacommonmetricforpatientreportedoutcomesincancerpatientslinkingpatientreportedoutcomesmeasurementinformationsystempromisnumericalratingscaleandpatientreportedoutcomesversionofthecommonterminologycriteriaforadverseeventsproctcae AT celladavid establishingacommonmetricforpatientreportedoutcomesincancerpatientslinkingpatientreportedoutcomesmeasurementinformationsystempromisnumericalratingscaleandpatientreportedoutcomesversionofthecommonterminologycriteriaforadverseeventsproctcae AT yostkathleenj establishingacommonmetricforpatientreportedoutcomesincancerpatientslinkingpatientreportedoutcomesmeasurementinformationsystempromisnumericalratingscaleandpatientreportedoutcomesversionofthecommonterminologycriteriaforadverseeventsproctcae AT dueckamylouc establishingacommonmetricforpatientreportedoutcomesincancerpatientslinkingpatientreportedoutcomesmeasurementinformationsystempromisnumericalratingscaleandpatientreportedoutcomesversionofthecommonterminologycriteriaforadverseeventsproctcae AT novotnypaulj establishingacommonmetricforpatientreportedoutcomesincancerpatientslinkingpatientreportedoutcomesmeasurementinformationsystempromisnumericalratingscaleandpatientreportedoutcomesversionofthecommonterminologycriteriaforadverseeventsproctcae AT sloanjeffa establishingacommonmetricforpatientreportedoutcomesincancerpatientslinkingpatientreportedoutcomesmeasurementinformationsystempromisnumericalratingscaleandpatientreportedoutcomesversionofthecommonterminologycriteriaforadverseeventsproctcae |