Cargando…

Evaluation of image quality with four positron emitters and three preclinical PET/CT systems

BACKGROUND: We investigated the image quality of (11)C, (68)Ga, (18)F and (89)Zr, which have different positron fractions, physical half-lifes and positron ranges. Three small animal positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) systems were used in the evaluation, including the Siemens...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Teuho, Jarmo, Riehakainen, Leon, Honkaniemi, Aake, Moisio, Olli, Han, Chunlei, Tirri, Marko, Liu, Shihao, Grönroos, Tove J., Liu, Jie, Wan, Lin, Liang, Xiao, Ling, Yiqing, Hua, Yuexuan, Roivainen, Anne, Knuuti, Juhani, Xie, Qingguo, Teräs, Mika, D’Ascenzo, Nicola, Klén, Riku
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7728905/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33301074
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13550-020-00724-z
_version_ 1783621361399234560
author Teuho, Jarmo
Riehakainen, Leon
Honkaniemi, Aake
Moisio, Olli
Han, Chunlei
Tirri, Marko
Liu, Shihao
Grönroos, Tove J.
Liu, Jie
Wan, Lin
Liang, Xiao
Ling, Yiqing
Hua, Yuexuan
Roivainen, Anne
Knuuti, Juhani
Xie, Qingguo
Teräs, Mika
D’Ascenzo, Nicola
Klén, Riku
author_facet Teuho, Jarmo
Riehakainen, Leon
Honkaniemi, Aake
Moisio, Olli
Han, Chunlei
Tirri, Marko
Liu, Shihao
Grönroos, Tove J.
Liu, Jie
Wan, Lin
Liang, Xiao
Ling, Yiqing
Hua, Yuexuan
Roivainen, Anne
Knuuti, Juhani
Xie, Qingguo
Teräs, Mika
D’Ascenzo, Nicola
Klén, Riku
author_sort Teuho, Jarmo
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: We investigated the image quality of (11)C, (68)Ga, (18)F and (89)Zr, which have different positron fractions, physical half-lifes and positron ranges. Three small animal positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) systems were used in the evaluation, including the Siemens Inveon, RAYCAN X5 and Molecubes β-cube. The evaluation was performed on a single scanner level using the national electrical manufacturers association (NEMA) image quality phantom and analysis protocol. Acquisitions were performed with the standard NEMA protocol for (18)F and using a radionuclide-specific acquisition time for (11)C, (68)Ga and (89)Zr. Images were assessed using percent recovery coefficient (%RC), percentage standard deviation (%STD), image uniformity (%SD), spill-over ratio (SOR) and evaluation of image quantification. RESULTS: (68)Ga had the lowest %RC (< 62%) across all systems. (18)F had the highest maximum %RC (> 85%) and lowest %STD for the 5 mm rod across all systems. For (11)C and (89)Zr, the maximum %RC was close (> 76%) to the %RC with (18)F. A larger SOR were measured in water with (11)C and (68)Ga compared to (18)F on all systems. SOR in air reflected image reconstruction and data correction performance. Large variation in image quantification was observed, with maximal errors of 22.73% ((89)Zr, Inveon), 17.54% ((89)Zr, RAYCAN) and − 14.87% ((68)Ga, Molecubes). CONCLUSIONS: The systems performed most optimal in terms of NEMA image quality parameters when using (18)F, where (11)C and (89)Zr performed slightly worse than (18)F. The performance was least optimal when using (68)Ga, due to large positron range. The large quantification differences prompt optimization not only by terms of image quality but also quantification. Further investigation should be performed to find an appropriate calibration and harmonization protocol and the evaluation should be conducted on a multi-scanner and multi-center level.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7728905
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77289052020-12-17 Evaluation of image quality with four positron emitters and three preclinical PET/CT systems Teuho, Jarmo Riehakainen, Leon Honkaniemi, Aake Moisio, Olli Han, Chunlei Tirri, Marko Liu, Shihao Grönroos, Tove J. Liu, Jie Wan, Lin Liang, Xiao Ling, Yiqing Hua, Yuexuan Roivainen, Anne Knuuti, Juhani Xie, Qingguo Teräs, Mika D’Ascenzo, Nicola Klén, Riku EJNMMI Res Original Research BACKGROUND: We investigated the image quality of (11)C, (68)Ga, (18)F and (89)Zr, which have different positron fractions, physical half-lifes and positron ranges. Three small animal positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) systems were used in the evaluation, including the Siemens Inveon, RAYCAN X5 and Molecubes β-cube. The evaluation was performed on a single scanner level using the national electrical manufacturers association (NEMA) image quality phantom and analysis protocol. Acquisitions were performed with the standard NEMA protocol for (18)F and using a radionuclide-specific acquisition time for (11)C, (68)Ga and (89)Zr. Images were assessed using percent recovery coefficient (%RC), percentage standard deviation (%STD), image uniformity (%SD), spill-over ratio (SOR) and evaluation of image quantification. RESULTS: (68)Ga had the lowest %RC (< 62%) across all systems. (18)F had the highest maximum %RC (> 85%) and lowest %STD for the 5 mm rod across all systems. For (11)C and (89)Zr, the maximum %RC was close (> 76%) to the %RC with (18)F. A larger SOR were measured in water with (11)C and (68)Ga compared to (18)F on all systems. SOR in air reflected image reconstruction and data correction performance. Large variation in image quantification was observed, with maximal errors of 22.73% ((89)Zr, Inveon), 17.54% ((89)Zr, RAYCAN) and − 14.87% ((68)Ga, Molecubes). CONCLUSIONS: The systems performed most optimal in terms of NEMA image quality parameters when using (18)F, where (11)C and (89)Zr performed slightly worse than (18)F. The performance was least optimal when using (68)Ga, due to large positron range. The large quantification differences prompt optimization not only by terms of image quality but also quantification. Further investigation should be performed to find an appropriate calibration and harmonization protocol and the evaluation should be conducted on a multi-scanner and multi-center level. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020-12-10 /pmc/articles/PMC7728905/ /pubmed/33301074 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13550-020-00724-z Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Original Research
Teuho, Jarmo
Riehakainen, Leon
Honkaniemi, Aake
Moisio, Olli
Han, Chunlei
Tirri, Marko
Liu, Shihao
Grönroos, Tove J.
Liu, Jie
Wan, Lin
Liang, Xiao
Ling, Yiqing
Hua, Yuexuan
Roivainen, Anne
Knuuti, Juhani
Xie, Qingguo
Teräs, Mika
D’Ascenzo, Nicola
Klén, Riku
Evaluation of image quality with four positron emitters and three preclinical PET/CT systems
title Evaluation of image quality with four positron emitters and three preclinical PET/CT systems
title_full Evaluation of image quality with four positron emitters and three preclinical PET/CT systems
title_fullStr Evaluation of image quality with four positron emitters and three preclinical PET/CT systems
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of image quality with four positron emitters and three preclinical PET/CT systems
title_short Evaluation of image quality with four positron emitters and three preclinical PET/CT systems
title_sort evaluation of image quality with four positron emitters and three preclinical pet/ct systems
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7728905/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33301074
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13550-020-00724-z
work_keys_str_mv AT teuhojarmo evaluationofimagequalitywithfourpositronemittersandthreepreclinicalpetctsystems
AT riehakainenleon evaluationofimagequalitywithfourpositronemittersandthreepreclinicalpetctsystems
AT honkaniemiaake evaluationofimagequalitywithfourpositronemittersandthreepreclinicalpetctsystems
AT moisioolli evaluationofimagequalitywithfourpositronemittersandthreepreclinicalpetctsystems
AT hanchunlei evaluationofimagequalitywithfourpositronemittersandthreepreclinicalpetctsystems
AT tirrimarko evaluationofimagequalitywithfourpositronemittersandthreepreclinicalpetctsystems
AT liushihao evaluationofimagequalitywithfourpositronemittersandthreepreclinicalpetctsystems
AT gronroostovej evaluationofimagequalitywithfourpositronemittersandthreepreclinicalpetctsystems
AT liujie evaluationofimagequalitywithfourpositronemittersandthreepreclinicalpetctsystems
AT wanlin evaluationofimagequalitywithfourpositronemittersandthreepreclinicalpetctsystems
AT liangxiao evaluationofimagequalitywithfourpositronemittersandthreepreclinicalpetctsystems
AT lingyiqing evaluationofimagequalitywithfourpositronemittersandthreepreclinicalpetctsystems
AT huayuexuan evaluationofimagequalitywithfourpositronemittersandthreepreclinicalpetctsystems
AT roivainenanne evaluationofimagequalitywithfourpositronemittersandthreepreclinicalpetctsystems
AT knuutijuhani evaluationofimagequalitywithfourpositronemittersandthreepreclinicalpetctsystems
AT xieqingguo evaluationofimagequalitywithfourpositronemittersandthreepreclinicalpetctsystems
AT terasmika evaluationofimagequalitywithfourpositronemittersandthreepreclinicalpetctsystems
AT dascenzonicola evaluationofimagequalitywithfourpositronemittersandthreepreclinicalpetctsystems
AT klenriku evaluationofimagequalitywithfourpositronemittersandthreepreclinicalpetctsystems