Cargando…

Acute Effects of Continuous and Intermittent Blood Flow Restriction on Movement Velocity During Bench Press Exercise Against Different Loads

This study evaluated the effects of continuous and intermittent blood flow restriction (BFR) with 70% of full arterial occlusion pressure on bar velocity during the bench press exercise against a wide range of resistive loads. Eleven strength-trained males (age: 23.5 ± 1.4 years; resistance training...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wilk, Michal, Gepfert, Mariola, Krzysztofik, Michal, Stastny, Petr, Zajac, Adam, Bogdanis, Gregory C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7728989/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33329020
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2020.569915
_version_ 1783621364554399744
author Wilk, Michal
Gepfert, Mariola
Krzysztofik, Michal
Stastny, Petr
Zajac, Adam
Bogdanis, Gregory C.
author_facet Wilk, Michal
Gepfert, Mariola
Krzysztofik, Michal
Stastny, Petr
Zajac, Adam
Bogdanis, Gregory C.
author_sort Wilk, Michal
collection PubMed
description This study evaluated the effects of continuous and intermittent blood flow restriction (BFR) with 70% of full arterial occlusion pressure on bar velocity during the bench press exercise against a wide range of resistive loads. Eleven strength-trained males (age: 23.5 ± 1.4 years; resistance training experience: 2.8 ± 0.8 years, maximal bench press strength – 1RM = 101.8 ± 13.9 kg; body mass = 79.8 ± 10.4 kg), performed three different testing protocols in random and counterbalanced order: without BFR (NO-BFR); intermittent BFR (I-BFR) and continuous BFR (C-BFR). During each experimental session, subjects performed eight sets of two repetitions each, with increasing loads from 20 to 90% 1RM (10% steps), and 3 min rest between each set. In the C-BFR condition occlusion was kept throughout the trial, while in the I-BFR, occlusion was released during each 3 min rest interval. Peak bar velocity (PV) during the bench press exercise was higher by 12–17% in both I-BFR and C-BFR compared with NO-BFR only at the loads of 20, 30, 40, and 50% 1RM (p < 0.001), while performance at higher loads remained unchanged. Mean bar velocity (MV) was unaffected by occlusion (p = 0.342). These results indicate that BFR during bench press exercise increases PV and this may be used as an enhanced stimulus during explosive resistance training. At higher workloads, bench press performance was not negatively affected by BFR, indicating that the benefits of exercise under occlusion can be obtained while explosive performance is not impaired.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7728989
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77289892020-12-15 Acute Effects of Continuous and Intermittent Blood Flow Restriction on Movement Velocity During Bench Press Exercise Against Different Loads Wilk, Michal Gepfert, Mariola Krzysztofik, Michal Stastny, Petr Zajac, Adam Bogdanis, Gregory C. Front Physiol Physiology This study evaluated the effects of continuous and intermittent blood flow restriction (BFR) with 70% of full arterial occlusion pressure on bar velocity during the bench press exercise against a wide range of resistive loads. Eleven strength-trained males (age: 23.5 ± 1.4 years; resistance training experience: 2.8 ± 0.8 years, maximal bench press strength – 1RM = 101.8 ± 13.9 kg; body mass = 79.8 ± 10.4 kg), performed three different testing protocols in random and counterbalanced order: without BFR (NO-BFR); intermittent BFR (I-BFR) and continuous BFR (C-BFR). During each experimental session, subjects performed eight sets of two repetitions each, with increasing loads from 20 to 90% 1RM (10% steps), and 3 min rest between each set. In the C-BFR condition occlusion was kept throughout the trial, while in the I-BFR, occlusion was released during each 3 min rest interval. Peak bar velocity (PV) during the bench press exercise was higher by 12–17% in both I-BFR and C-BFR compared with NO-BFR only at the loads of 20, 30, 40, and 50% 1RM (p < 0.001), while performance at higher loads remained unchanged. Mean bar velocity (MV) was unaffected by occlusion (p = 0.342). These results indicate that BFR during bench press exercise increases PV and this may be used as an enhanced stimulus during explosive resistance training. At higher workloads, bench press performance was not negatively affected by BFR, indicating that the benefits of exercise under occlusion can be obtained while explosive performance is not impaired. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-11-27 /pmc/articles/PMC7728989/ /pubmed/33329020 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2020.569915 Text en Copyright © 2020 Wilk, Gepfert, Krzysztofik, Stastny, Zajac and Bogdanis. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Physiology
Wilk, Michal
Gepfert, Mariola
Krzysztofik, Michal
Stastny, Petr
Zajac, Adam
Bogdanis, Gregory C.
Acute Effects of Continuous and Intermittent Blood Flow Restriction on Movement Velocity During Bench Press Exercise Against Different Loads
title Acute Effects of Continuous and Intermittent Blood Flow Restriction on Movement Velocity During Bench Press Exercise Against Different Loads
title_full Acute Effects of Continuous and Intermittent Blood Flow Restriction on Movement Velocity During Bench Press Exercise Against Different Loads
title_fullStr Acute Effects of Continuous and Intermittent Blood Flow Restriction on Movement Velocity During Bench Press Exercise Against Different Loads
title_full_unstemmed Acute Effects of Continuous and Intermittent Blood Flow Restriction on Movement Velocity During Bench Press Exercise Against Different Loads
title_short Acute Effects of Continuous and Intermittent Blood Flow Restriction on Movement Velocity During Bench Press Exercise Against Different Loads
title_sort acute effects of continuous and intermittent blood flow restriction on movement velocity during bench press exercise against different loads
topic Physiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7728989/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33329020
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2020.569915
work_keys_str_mv AT wilkmichal acuteeffectsofcontinuousandintermittentbloodflowrestrictiononmovementvelocityduringbenchpressexerciseagainstdifferentloads
AT gepfertmariola acuteeffectsofcontinuousandintermittentbloodflowrestrictiononmovementvelocityduringbenchpressexerciseagainstdifferentloads
AT krzysztofikmichal acuteeffectsofcontinuousandintermittentbloodflowrestrictiononmovementvelocityduringbenchpressexerciseagainstdifferentloads
AT stastnypetr acuteeffectsofcontinuousandintermittentbloodflowrestrictiononmovementvelocityduringbenchpressexerciseagainstdifferentloads
AT zajacadam acuteeffectsofcontinuousandintermittentbloodflowrestrictiononmovementvelocityduringbenchpressexerciseagainstdifferentloads
AT bogdanisgregoryc acuteeffectsofcontinuousandintermittentbloodflowrestrictiononmovementvelocityduringbenchpressexerciseagainstdifferentloads