Cargando…

A pilot protocol to assess the feasibility of a virtual multiple crossover, randomized controlled trial design using methylphenidate in mild cognitive impairment

BACKGROUND: The conventional clinical trial design in Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and AD-related disorders (ADRDs) is the parallel-group randomized controlled trial. However, in heterogeneous disorders like AD/ADRDs, this design requires large sample sizes to detect meaningful effects in an “average” p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: DesRuisseaux, Libby A., Williams, Victoria J., McManus, Alison J., Gupta, Anoopum S., Carlyle, Becky C., Azami, Hamed, Gerber, Jessica A., Bolling, Anna M., Cook, Carolyn L., Betensky, Rebecca A., Arnold, Steven E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7729136/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33308285
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-020-04752-x
_version_ 1783621392883777536
author DesRuisseaux, Libby A.
Williams, Victoria J.
McManus, Alison J.
Gupta, Anoopum S.
Carlyle, Becky C.
Azami, Hamed
Gerber, Jessica A.
Bolling, Anna M.
Cook, Carolyn L.
Betensky, Rebecca A.
Arnold, Steven E.
author_facet DesRuisseaux, Libby A.
Williams, Victoria J.
McManus, Alison J.
Gupta, Anoopum S.
Carlyle, Becky C.
Azami, Hamed
Gerber, Jessica A.
Bolling, Anna M.
Cook, Carolyn L.
Betensky, Rebecca A.
Arnold, Steven E.
author_sort DesRuisseaux, Libby A.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The conventional clinical trial design in Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and AD-related disorders (ADRDs) is the parallel-group randomized controlled trial. However, in heterogeneous disorders like AD/ADRDs, this design requires large sample sizes to detect meaningful effects in an “average” patient. They are very costly and, despite many attempts, have not yielded new treatments for many years. An alternative, the multi-crossover, randomized control trial (MCRCT) is a design in which each patient serves as their own control across successive, randomized blocks of active treatment and placebo. This design overcomes many limitations of parallel-group trials, yielding an unbiased assessment of treatment effect at the individual level (“N-of-1”) regardless of unique patient characteristics. The goal of the present study is to pilot a MCRCT of a potential symptomatic treatment, methylphenidate, for mild-stage AD/ADRDs, testing feasibility and compliance of participants in this design and efficacy of the drug using both standard and novel outcome measures suited for this design. METHODS: Ten participants with mild cognitive impairment or mild-stage dementia due to AD/ADRDs will undergo a 4-week lead-in period followed by three, month-long treatment blocks (2 weeks of treatment with methylphenidate, 2 weeks placebo in random order). This trial will be conducted entirely virtually with an optional in-person screening visit. The primary outcome of interest is feasibility as measured by compliance and retention, with secondary and exploratory outcomes including cognition as measured by neuropsychological assessment at the end of each treatment period and daily brain games played throughout the study, actigraphy, and neuropsychiatric and functional assessments. DISCUSSION: This pilot study will gauge the feasibility of conducting a virtual MCRCT for symptomatic treatment in early AD/ADRD. It will also compare home-based daily brain games with standard neuropsychological measures within a clinical trial for AD/ADRD. Particular attention will be paid to compliance, tolerability of drug and participation, learning effects, trends and stability of daily measures across blocks, medication carryover effects, and correlations between standard and brief daily assessments. These data will provide guidance for more efficient trial design and the use of potentially more robust, ecological outcome measures in AD/ADRD research. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03811847. Registered on 21 January 2019.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7729136
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77291362020-12-11 A pilot protocol to assess the feasibility of a virtual multiple crossover, randomized controlled trial design using methylphenidate in mild cognitive impairment DesRuisseaux, Libby A. Williams, Victoria J. McManus, Alison J. Gupta, Anoopum S. Carlyle, Becky C. Azami, Hamed Gerber, Jessica A. Bolling, Anna M. Cook, Carolyn L. Betensky, Rebecca A. Arnold, Steven E. Trials Study Protocol BACKGROUND: The conventional clinical trial design in Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and AD-related disorders (ADRDs) is the parallel-group randomized controlled trial. However, in heterogeneous disorders like AD/ADRDs, this design requires large sample sizes to detect meaningful effects in an “average” patient. They are very costly and, despite many attempts, have not yielded new treatments for many years. An alternative, the multi-crossover, randomized control trial (MCRCT) is a design in which each patient serves as their own control across successive, randomized blocks of active treatment and placebo. This design overcomes many limitations of parallel-group trials, yielding an unbiased assessment of treatment effect at the individual level (“N-of-1”) regardless of unique patient characteristics. The goal of the present study is to pilot a MCRCT of a potential symptomatic treatment, methylphenidate, for mild-stage AD/ADRDs, testing feasibility and compliance of participants in this design and efficacy of the drug using both standard and novel outcome measures suited for this design. METHODS: Ten participants with mild cognitive impairment or mild-stage dementia due to AD/ADRDs will undergo a 4-week lead-in period followed by three, month-long treatment blocks (2 weeks of treatment with methylphenidate, 2 weeks placebo in random order). This trial will be conducted entirely virtually with an optional in-person screening visit. The primary outcome of interest is feasibility as measured by compliance and retention, with secondary and exploratory outcomes including cognition as measured by neuropsychological assessment at the end of each treatment period and daily brain games played throughout the study, actigraphy, and neuropsychiatric and functional assessments. DISCUSSION: This pilot study will gauge the feasibility of conducting a virtual MCRCT for symptomatic treatment in early AD/ADRD. It will also compare home-based daily brain games with standard neuropsychological measures within a clinical trial for AD/ADRD. Particular attention will be paid to compliance, tolerability of drug and participation, learning effects, trends and stability of daily measures across blocks, medication carryover effects, and correlations between standard and brief daily assessments. These data will provide guidance for more efficient trial design and the use of potentially more robust, ecological outcome measures in AD/ADRD research. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03811847. Registered on 21 January 2019. BioMed Central 2020-12-11 /pmc/articles/PMC7729136/ /pubmed/33308285 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-020-04752-x Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
DesRuisseaux, Libby A.
Williams, Victoria J.
McManus, Alison J.
Gupta, Anoopum S.
Carlyle, Becky C.
Azami, Hamed
Gerber, Jessica A.
Bolling, Anna M.
Cook, Carolyn L.
Betensky, Rebecca A.
Arnold, Steven E.
A pilot protocol to assess the feasibility of a virtual multiple crossover, randomized controlled trial design using methylphenidate in mild cognitive impairment
title A pilot protocol to assess the feasibility of a virtual multiple crossover, randomized controlled trial design using methylphenidate in mild cognitive impairment
title_full A pilot protocol to assess the feasibility of a virtual multiple crossover, randomized controlled trial design using methylphenidate in mild cognitive impairment
title_fullStr A pilot protocol to assess the feasibility of a virtual multiple crossover, randomized controlled trial design using methylphenidate in mild cognitive impairment
title_full_unstemmed A pilot protocol to assess the feasibility of a virtual multiple crossover, randomized controlled trial design using methylphenidate in mild cognitive impairment
title_short A pilot protocol to assess the feasibility of a virtual multiple crossover, randomized controlled trial design using methylphenidate in mild cognitive impairment
title_sort pilot protocol to assess the feasibility of a virtual multiple crossover, randomized controlled trial design using methylphenidate in mild cognitive impairment
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7729136/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33308285
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-020-04752-x
work_keys_str_mv AT desruisseauxlibbya apilotprotocoltoassessthefeasibilityofavirtualmultiplecrossoverrandomizedcontrolledtrialdesignusingmethylphenidateinmildcognitiveimpairment
AT williamsvictoriaj apilotprotocoltoassessthefeasibilityofavirtualmultiplecrossoverrandomizedcontrolledtrialdesignusingmethylphenidateinmildcognitiveimpairment
AT mcmanusalisonj apilotprotocoltoassessthefeasibilityofavirtualmultiplecrossoverrandomizedcontrolledtrialdesignusingmethylphenidateinmildcognitiveimpairment
AT guptaanoopums apilotprotocoltoassessthefeasibilityofavirtualmultiplecrossoverrandomizedcontrolledtrialdesignusingmethylphenidateinmildcognitiveimpairment
AT carlylebeckyc apilotprotocoltoassessthefeasibilityofavirtualmultiplecrossoverrandomizedcontrolledtrialdesignusingmethylphenidateinmildcognitiveimpairment
AT azamihamed apilotprotocoltoassessthefeasibilityofavirtualmultiplecrossoverrandomizedcontrolledtrialdesignusingmethylphenidateinmildcognitiveimpairment
AT gerberjessicaa apilotprotocoltoassessthefeasibilityofavirtualmultiplecrossoverrandomizedcontrolledtrialdesignusingmethylphenidateinmildcognitiveimpairment
AT bollingannam apilotprotocoltoassessthefeasibilityofavirtualmultiplecrossoverrandomizedcontrolledtrialdesignusingmethylphenidateinmildcognitiveimpairment
AT cookcarolynl apilotprotocoltoassessthefeasibilityofavirtualmultiplecrossoverrandomizedcontrolledtrialdesignusingmethylphenidateinmildcognitiveimpairment
AT betenskyrebeccaa apilotprotocoltoassessthefeasibilityofavirtualmultiplecrossoverrandomizedcontrolledtrialdesignusingmethylphenidateinmildcognitiveimpairment
AT arnoldstevene apilotprotocoltoassessthefeasibilityofavirtualmultiplecrossoverrandomizedcontrolledtrialdesignusingmethylphenidateinmildcognitiveimpairment
AT desruisseauxlibbya pilotprotocoltoassessthefeasibilityofavirtualmultiplecrossoverrandomizedcontrolledtrialdesignusingmethylphenidateinmildcognitiveimpairment
AT williamsvictoriaj pilotprotocoltoassessthefeasibilityofavirtualmultiplecrossoverrandomizedcontrolledtrialdesignusingmethylphenidateinmildcognitiveimpairment
AT mcmanusalisonj pilotprotocoltoassessthefeasibilityofavirtualmultiplecrossoverrandomizedcontrolledtrialdesignusingmethylphenidateinmildcognitiveimpairment
AT guptaanoopums pilotprotocoltoassessthefeasibilityofavirtualmultiplecrossoverrandomizedcontrolledtrialdesignusingmethylphenidateinmildcognitiveimpairment
AT carlylebeckyc pilotprotocoltoassessthefeasibilityofavirtualmultiplecrossoverrandomizedcontrolledtrialdesignusingmethylphenidateinmildcognitiveimpairment
AT azamihamed pilotprotocoltoassessthefeasibilityofavirtualmultiplecrossoverrandomizedcontrolledtrialdesignusingmethylphenidateinmildcognitiveimpairment
AT gerberjessicaa pilotprotocoltoassessthefeasibilityofavirtualmultiplecrossoverrandomizedcontrolledtrialdesignusingmethylphenidateinmildcognitiveimpairment
AT bollingannam pilotprotocoltoassessthefeasibilityofavirtualmultiplecrossoverrandomizedcontrolledtrialdesignusingmethylphenidateinmildcognitiveimpairment
AT cookcarolynl pilotprotocoltoassessthefeasibilityofavirtualmultiplecrossoverrandomizedcontrolledtrialdesignusingmethylphenidateinmildcognitiveimpairment
AT betenskyrebeccaa pilotprotocoltoassessthefeasibilityofavirtualmultiplecrossoverrandomizedcontrolledtrialdesignusingmethylphenidateinmildcognitiveimpairment
AT arnoldstevene pilotprotocoltoassessthefeasibilityofavirtualmultiplecrossoverrandomizedcontrolledtrialdesignusingmethylphenidateinmildcognitiveimpairment