Cargando…

Safety and outcomes of percutaneous tracheostomy in coronavirus disease 2019 pneumonitis patients requiring prolonged mechanical ventilation

OBJECTIVES: Tracheostomy for coronavirus disease 2019 pneumonitis patients requiring prolonged invasive mechanical ventilation remains a matter of debate. This study analysed the timing and outcomes of percutaneous tracheostomy, and reports our experience of a dedicated ENT–anaesthetics department l...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Takhar, A, Tornari, C, Amin, N, Wyncoll, D, Tricklebank, S, Arora, A, Ahmad, I, Simo, R, Surda, P
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cambridge University Press 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7729174/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33143760
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0022215120002303
_version_ 1783621401777799168
author Takhar, A
Tornari, C
Amin, N
Wyncoll, D
Tricklebank, S
Arora, A
Ahmad, I
Simo, R
Surda, P
author_facet Takhar, A
Tornari, C
Amin, N
Wyncoll, D
Tricklebank, S
Arora, A
Ahmad, I
Simo, R
Surda, P
author_sort Takhar, A
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Tracheostomy for coronavirus disease 2019 pneumonitis patients requiring prolonged invasive mechanical ventilation remains a matter of debate. This study analysed the timing and outcomes of percutaneous tracheostomy, and reports our experience of a dedicated ENT–anaesthetics department led tracheostomy team. METHOD: A prospective single-centre observational study was conducted of patients undergoing tracheostomy, who had been diagnosed with coronavirus disease 2019 pneumonitis, between 21st March and 20th May 2020. RESULTS: Eighty-one patients underwent tracheostomy after a median (interquartile range) of 16 (13–20) days of invasive mechanical ventilation. Median follow-up duration was 32 (23–40) days. Of patients, 86.7 per cent were successfully liberated from invasive mechanical ventilation in a median (interquartile range) of 12 (7–16) days. Moreover, 68.7 per cent were subsequently discharged from hospital. On univariate analysis, there was no difference in outcomes between early (before day 14) and late (day 14 or later) tracheostomy. The mortality rate was 8.6 per cent and no deaths were tracheostomy related. CONCLUSION: Outcomes appear favourable when patients are carefully selected. Percutaneous tracheostomy performed via a multidisciplinary approach, with appropriate training, was safe and optimised healthcare resource utilisation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7729174
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77291742020-12-11 Safety and outcomes of percutaneous tracheostomy in coronavirus disease 2019 pneumonitis patients requiring prolonged mechanical ventilation Takhar, A Tornari, C Amin, N Wyncoll, D Tricklebank, S Arora, A Ahmad, I Simo, R Surda, P J Laryngol Otol Main Articles OBJECTIVES: Tracheostomy for coronavirus disease 2019 pneumonitis patients requiring prolonged invasive mechanical ventilation remains a matter of debate. This study analysed the timing and outcomes of percutaneous tracheostomy, and reports our experience of a dedicated ENT–anaesthetics department led tracheostomy team. METHOD: A prospective single-centre observational study was conducted of patients undergoing tracheostomy, who had been diagnosed with coronavirus disease 2019 pneumonitis, between 21st March and 20th May 2020. RESULTS: Eighty-one patients underwent tracheostomy after a median (interquartile range) of 16 (13–20) days of invasive mechanical ventilation. Median follow-up duration was 32 (23–40) days. Of patients, 86.7 per cent were successfully liberated from invasive mechanical ventilation in a median (interquartile range) of 12 (7–16) days. Moreover, 68.7 per cent were subsequently discharged from hospital. On univariate analysis, there was no difference in outcomes between early (before day 14) and late (day 14 or later) tracheostomy. The mortality rate was 8.6 per cent and no deaths were tracheostomy related. CONCLUSION: Outcomes appear favourable when patients are carefully selected. Percutaneous tracheostomy performed via a multidisciplinary approach, with appropriate training, was safe and optimised healthcare resource utilisation. Cambridge University Press 2020-11-04 /pmc/articles/PMC7729174/ /pubmed/33143760 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0022215120002303 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Main Articles
Takhar, A
Tornari, C
Amin, N
Wyncoll, D
Tricklebank, S
Arora, A
Ahmad, I
Simo, R
Surda, P
Safety and outcomes of percutaneous tracheostomy in coronavirus disease 2019 pneumonitis patients requiring prolonged mechanical ventilation
title Safety and outcomes of percutaneous tracheostomy in coronavirus disease 2019 pneumonitis patients requiring prolonged mechanical ventilation
title_full Safety and outcomes of percutaneous tracheostomy in coronavirus disease 2019 pneumonitis patients requiring prolonged mechanical ventilation
title_fullStr Safety and outcomes of percutaneous tracheostomy in coronavirus disease 2019 pneumonitis patients requiring prolonged mechanical ventilation
title_full_unstemmed Safety and outcomes of percutaneous tracheostomy in coronavirus disease 2019 pneumonitis patients requiring prolonged mechanical ventilation
title_short Safety and outcomes of percutaneous tracheostomy in coronavirus disease 2019 pneumonitis patients requiring prolonged mechanical ventilation
title_sort safety and outcomes of percutaneous tracheostomy in coronavirus disease 2019 pneumonitis patients requiring prolonged mechanical ventilation
topic Main Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7729174/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33143760
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0022215120002303
work_keys_str_mv AT takhara safetyandoutcomesofpercutaneoustracheostomyincoronavirusdisease2019pneumonitispatientsrequiringprolongedmechanicalventilation
AT tornaric safetyandoutcomesofpercutaneoustracheostomyincoronavirusdisease2019pneumonitispatientsrequiringprolongedmechanicalventilation
AT aminn safetyandoutcomesofpercutaneoustracheostomyincoronavirusdisease2019pneumonitispatientsrequiringprolongedmechanicalventilation
AT wyncolld safetyandoutcomesofpercutaneoustracheostomyincoronavirusdisease2019pneumonitispatientsrequiringprolongedmechanicalventilation
AT tricklebanks safetyandoutcomesofpercutaneoustracheostomyincoronavirusdisease2019pneumonitispatientsrequiringprolongedmechanicalventilation
AT aroraa safetyandoutcomesofpercutaneoustracheostomyincoronavirusdisease2019pneumonitispatientsrequiringprolongedmechanicalventilation
AT ahmadi safetyandoutcomesofpercutaneoustracheostomyincoronavirusdisease2019pneumonitispatientsrequiringprolongedmechanicalventilation
AT simor safetyandoutcomesofpercutaneoustracheostomyincoronavirusdisease2019pneumonitispatientsrequiringprolongedmechanicalventilation
AT surdap safetyandoutcomesofpercutaneoustracheostomyincoronavirusdisease2019pneumonitispatientsrequiringprolongedmechanicalventilation