Cargando…
Recent developments in intraocular lens power calculation methods—update 2020
For many decades only a few formulas have been available to calculate the intraocular lens (IOL) power for patients undergoing cataract surgery: the Haigis, Hoffer Q, Holladay 1 and 2 and SRK/T. In recent years, several new formulas for IOL power calculation have been introduced with the aim of impr...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
AME Publishing Company
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7729321/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33313298 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/atm-20-2290 |
_version_ | 1783621431480811520 |
---|---|
author | Savini, Giacomo Taroni, Leonardo Hoffer, Kenneth J. |
author_facet | Savini, Giacomo Taroni, Leonardo Hoffer, Kenneth J. |
author_sort | Savini, Giacomo |
collection | PubMed |
description | For many decades only a few formulas have been available to calculate the intraocular lens (IOL) power for patients undergoing cataract surgery: the Haigis, Hoffer Q, Holladay 1 and 2 and SRK/T. In recent years, several new formulas for IOL power calculation have been introduced with the aim of improving the accuracy of refraction prediction in eyes undergoing cataract surgery. These include the Barrett Universal II, the Emmetropia Verifying Optical (EVO), the Kane, the Næser 2, the Olsen, the Panacea, the Pearl DGS, the Radial Basis Function (RBF), the T2 and the VRF formulas. Although most of them are unpublished so that their structure is unknown, we give an overview of each formula and report the results of the studies that have compared them. Their performance in short and long eyes is provided and a special focus is given on the issue of segmented axial length, which is a promising method to obtain more accurate outcomes in short and long eyes. Here, the group refractive index originally developed for the IOLMaster may not represent the best method to convert the optical path length into a physical distance. The issue of posterior and total corneal astigmatism (TCA) is discussed in relation to toric IOLs; the latest formulas for toric IOLs and their results are also reported. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7729321 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | AME Publishing Company |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-77293212020-12-11 Recent developments in intraocular lens power calculation methods—update 2020 Savini, Giacomo Taroni, Leonardo Hoffer, Kenneth J. Ann Transl Med Review Article on Recent Developments in Cataract Surgery For many decades only a few formulas have been available to calculate the intraocular lens (IOL) power for patients undergoing cataract surgery: the Haigis, Hoffer Q, Holladay 1 and 2 and SRK/T. In recent years, several new formulas for IOL power calculation have been introduced with the aim of improving the accuracy of refraction prediction in eyes undergoing cataract surgery. These include the Barrett Universal II, the Emmetropia Verifying Optical (EVO), the Kane, the Næser 2, the Olsen, the Panacea, the Pearl DGS, the Radial Basis Function (RBF), the T2 and the VRF formulas. Although most of them are unpublished so that their structure is unknown, we give an overview of each formula and report the results of the studies that have compared them. Their performance in short and long eyes is provided and a special focus is given on the issue of segmented axial length, which is a promising method to obtain more accurate outcomes in short and long eyes. Here, the group refractive index originally developed for the IOLMaster may not represent the best method to convert the optical path length into a physical distance. The issue of posterior and total corneal astigmatism (TCA) is discussed in relation to toric IOLs; the latest formulas for toric IOLs and their results are also reported. AME Publishing Company 2020-11 /pmc/articles/PMC7729321/ /pubmed/33313298 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/atm-20-2290 Text en 2020 Annals of Translational Medicine. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Review Article on Recent Developments in Cataract Surgery Savini, Giacomo Taroni, Leonardo Hoffer, Kenneth J. Recent developments in intraocular lens power calculation methods—update 2020 |
title | Recent developments in intraocular lens power calculation methods—update 2020 |
title_full | Recent developments in intraocular lens power calculation methods—update 2020 |
title_fullStr | Recent developments in intraocular lens power calculation methods—update 2020 |
title_full_unstemmed | Recent developments in intraocular lens power calculation methods—update 2020 |
title_short | Recent developments in intraocular lens power calculation methods—update 2020 |
title_sort | recent developments in intraocular lens power calculation methods—update 2020 |
topic | Review Article on Recent Developments in Cataract Surgery |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7729321/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33313298 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/atm-20-2290 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT savinigiacomo recentdevelopmentsinintraocularlenspowercalculationmethodsupdate2020 AT taronileonardo recentdevelopmentsinintraocularlenspowercalculationmethodsupdate2020 AT hofferkennethj recentdevelopmentsinintraocularlenspowercalculationmethodsupdate2020 |