Cargando…

Recent developments in intraocular lens power calculation methods—update 2020

For many decades only a few formulas have been available to calculate the intraocular lens (IOL) power for patients undergoing cataract surgery: the Haigis, Hoffer Q, Holladay 1 and 2 and SRK/T. In recent years, several new formulas for IOL power calculation have been introduced with the aim of impr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Savini, Giacomo, Taroni, Leonardo, Hoffer, Kenneth J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: AME Publishing Company 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7729321/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33313298
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/atm-20-2290
_version_ 1783621431480811520
author Savini, Giacomo
Taroni, Leonardo
Hoffer, Kenneth J.
author_facet Savini, Giacomo
Taroni, Leonardo
Hoffer, Kenneth J.
author_sort Savini, Giacomo
collection PubMed
description For many decades only a few formulas have been available to calculate the intraocular lens (IOL) power for patients undergoing cataract surgery: the Haigis, Hoffer Q, Holladay 1 and 2 and SRK/T. In recent years, several new formulas for IOL power calculation have been introduced with the aim of improving the accuracy of refraction prediction in eyes undergoing cataract surgery. These include the Barrett Universal II, the Emmetropia Verifying Optical (EVO), the Kane, the Næser 2, the Olsen, the Panacea, the Pearl DGS, the Radial Basis Function (RBF), the T2 and the VRF formulas. Although most of them are unpublished so that their structure is unknown, we give an overview of each formula and report the results of the studies that have compared them. Their performance in short and long eyes is provided and a special focus is given on the issue of segmented axial length, which is a promising method to obtain more accurate outcomes in short and long eyes. Here, the group refractive index originally developed for the IOLMaster may not represent the best method to convert the optical path length into a physical distance. The issue of posterior and total corneal astigmatism (TCA) is discussed in relation to toric IOLs; the latest formulas for toric IOLs and their results are also reported.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7729321
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher AME Publishing Company
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77293212020-12-11 Recent developments in intraocular lens power calculation methods—update 2020 Savini, Giacomo Taroni, Leonardo Hoffer, Kenneth J. Ann Transl Med Review Article on Recent Developments in Cataract Surgery For many decades only a few formulas have been available to calculate the intraocular lens (IOL) power for patients undergoing cataract surgery: the Haigis, Hoffer Q, Holladay 1 and 2 and SRK/T. In recent years, several new formulas for IOL power calculation have been introduced with the aim of improving the accuracy of refraction prediction in eyes undergoing cataract surgery. These include the Barrett Universal II, the Emmetropia Verifying Optical (EVO), the Kane, the Næser 2, the Olsen, the Panacea, the Pearl DGS, the Radial Basis Function (RBF), the T2 and the VRF formulas. Although most of them are unpublished so that their structure is unknown, we give an overview of each formula and report the results of the studies that have compared them. Their performance in short and long eyes is provided and a special focus is given on the issue of segmented axial length, which is a promising method to obtain more accurate outcomes in short and long eyes. Here, the group refractive index originally developed for the IOLMaster may not represent the best method to convert the optical path length into a physical distance. The issue of posterior and total corneal astigmatism (TCA) is discussed in relation to toric IOLs; the latest formulas for toric IOLs and their results are also reported. AME Publishing Company 2020-11 /pmc/articles/PMC7729321/ /pubmed/33313298 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/atm-20-2290 Text en 2020 Annals of Translational Medicine. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Review Article on Recent Developments in Cataract Surgery
Savini, Giacomo
Taroni, Leonardo
Hoffer, Kenneth J.
Recent developments in intraocular lens power calculation methods—update 2020
title Recent developments in intraocular lens power calculation methods—update 2020
title_full Recent developments in intraocular lens power calculation methods—update 2020
title_fullStr Recent developments in intraocular lens power calculation methods—update 2020
title_full_unstemmed Recent developments in intraocular lens power calculation methods—update 2020
title_short Recent developments in intraocular lens power calculation methods—update 2020
title_sort recent developments in intraocular lens power calculation methods—update 2020
topic Review Article on Recent Developments in Cataract Surgery
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7729321/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33313298
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/atm-20-2290
work_keys_str_mv AT savinigiacomo recentdevelopmentsinintraocularlenspowercalculationmethodsupdate2020
AT taronileonardo recentdevelopmentsinintraocularlenspowercalculationmethodsupdate2020
AT hofferkennethj recentdevelopmentsinintraocularlenspowercalculationmethodsupdate2020