Cargando…

Automatic segmentation with detection of local segmentation failures in cardiac MRI

Segmentation of cardiac anatomical structures in cardiac magnetic resonance images (CMRI) is a prerequisite for automatic diagnosis and prognosis of cardiovascular diseases. To increase robustness and performance of segmentation methods this study combines automatic segmentation and assessment of se...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sander, Jörg, de Vos, Bob D., Išgum, Ivana
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7729401/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33303782
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-77733-4
_version_ 1783621450368811008
author Sander, Jörg
de Vos, Bob D.
Išgum, Ivana
author_facet Sander, Jörg
de Vos, Bob D.
Išgum, Ivana
author_sort Sander, Jörg
collection PubMed
description Segmentation of cardiac anatomical structures in cardiac magnetic resonance images (CMRI) is a prerequisite for automatic diagnosis and prognosis of cardiovascular diseases. To increase robustness and performance of segmentation methods this study combines automatic segmentation and assessment of segmentation uncertainty in CMRI to detect image regions containing local segmentation failures. Three existing state-of-the-art convolutional neural networks (CNN) were trained to automatically segment cardiac anatomical structures and obtain two measures of predictive uncertainty: entropy and a measure derived by MC-dropout. Thereafter, using the uncertainties another CNN was trained to detect local segmentation failures that potentially need correction by an expert. Finally, manual correction of the detected regions was simulated in the complete set of scans of 100 patients and manually performed in a random subset of scans of 50 patients. Using publicly available CMR scans from the MICCAI 2017 ACDC challenge, the impact of CNN architecture and loss function for segmentation, and the uncertainty measure was investigated. Performance was evaluated using the Dice coefficient, 3D Hausdorff distance and clinical metrics between manual and (corrected) automatic segmentation. The experiments reveal that combining automatic segmentation with manual correction of detected segmentation failures results in improved segmentation and to 10-fold reduction of expert time compared to manual expert segmentation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7729401
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77294012020-12-14 Automatic segmentation with detection of local segmentation failures in cardiac MRI Sander, Jörg de Vos, Bob D. Išgum, Ivana Sci Rep Article Segmentation of cardiac anatomical structures in cardiac magnetic resonance images (CMRI) is a prerequisite for automatic diagnosis and prognosis of cardiovascular diseases. To increase robustness and performance of segmentation methods this study combines automatic segmentation and assessment of segmentation uncertainty in CMRI to detect image regions containing local segmentation failures. Three existing state-of-the-art convolutional neural networks (CNN) were trained to automatically segment cardiac anatomical structures and obtain two measures of predictive uncertainty: entropy and a measure derived by MC-dropout. Thereafter, using the uncertainties another CNN was trained to detect local segmentation failures that potentially need correction by an expert. Finally, manual correction of the detected regions was simulated in the complete set of scans of 100 patients and manually performed in a random subset of scans of 50 patients. Using publicly available CMR scans from the MICCAI 2017 ACDC challenge, the impact of CNN architecture and loss function for segmentation, and the uncertainty measure was investigated. Performance was evaluated using the Dice coefficient, 3D Hausdorff distance and clinical metrics between manual and (corrected) automatic segmentation. The experiments reveal that combining automatic segmentation with manual correction of detected segmentation failures results in improved segmentation and to 10-fold reduction of expert time compared to manual expert segmentation. Nature Publishing Group UK 2020-12-10 /pmc/articles/PMC7729401/ /pubmed/33303782 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-77733-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Sander, Jörg
de Vos, Bob D.
Išgum, Ivana
Automatic segmentation with detection of local segmentation failures in cardiac MRI
title Automatic segmentation with detection of local segmentation failures in cardiac MRI
title_full Automatic segmentation with detection of local segmentation failures in cardiac MRI
title_fullStr Automatic segmentation with detection of local segmentation failures in cardiac MRI
title_full_unstemmed Automatic segmentation with detection of local segmentation failures in cardiac MRI
title_short Automatic segmentation with detection of local segmentation failures in cardiac MRI
title_sort automatic segmentation with detection of local segmentation failures in cardiac mri
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7729401/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33303782
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-77733-4
work_keys_str_mv AT sanderjorg automaticsegmentationwithdetectionoflocalsegmentationfailuresincardiacmri
AT devosbobd automaticsegmentationwithdetectionoflocalsegmentationfailuresincardiacmri
AT isgumivana automaticsegmentationwithdetectionoflocalsegmentationfailuresincardiacmri