Cargando…

Multimodal Data Fusion in Learning Analytics: A Systematic Review

Multimodal learning analytics (MMLA), which has become increasingly popular, can help provide an accurate understanding of learning processes. However, it is still unclear how multimodal data is integrated into MMLA. By following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mu, Su, Cui, Meng, Huang, Xiaodi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7729570/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33266131
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s20236856
_version_ 1783621489154588672
author Mu, Su
Cui, Meng
Huang, Xiaodi
author_facet Mu, Su
Cui, Meng
Huang, Xiaodi
author_sort Mu, Su
collection PubMed
description Multimodal learning analytics (MMLA), which has become increasingly popular, can help provide an accurate understanding of learning processes. However, it is still unclear how multimodal data is integrated into MMLA. By following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, this paper systematically surveys 346 articles on MMLA published during the past three years. For this purpose, we first present a conceptual model for reviewing these articles from three dimensions: data types, learning indicators, and data fusion. Based on this model, we then answer the following questions: 1. What types of data and learning indicators are used in MMLA, together with their relationships; and 2. What are the classifications of the data fusion methods in MMLA. Finally, we point out the key stages in data fusion and the future research direction in MMLA. Our main findings from this review are (a) The data in MMLA are classified into digital data, physical data, physiological data, psychometric data, and environment data; (b) The learning indicators are behavior, cognition, emotion, collaboration, and engagement; (c) The relationships between multimodal data and learning indicators are one-to-one, one-to-any, and many-to-one. The complex relationships between multimodal data and learning indicators are the key for data fusion; (d) The main data fusion methods in MMLA are many-to-one, many-to-many and multiple validations among multimodal data; and (e) Multimodal data fusion can be characterized by the multimodality of data, multi-dimension of indicators, and diversity of methods.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7729570
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77295702020-12-12 Multimodal Data Fusion in Learning Analytics: A Systematic Review Mu, Su Cui, Meng Huang, Xiaodi Sensors (Basel) Review Multimodal learning analytics (MMLA), which has become increasingly popular, can help provide an accurate understanding of learning processes. However, it is still unclear how multimodal data is integrated into MMLA. By following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, this paper systematically surveys 346 articles on MMLA published during the past three years. For this purpose, we first present a conceptual model for reviewing these articles from three dimensions: data types, learning indicators, and data fusion. Based on this model, we then answer the following questions: 1. What types of data and learning indicators are used in MMLA, together with their relationships; and 2. What are the classifications of the data fusion methods in MMLA. Finally, we point out the key stages in data fusion and the future research direction in MMLA. Our main findings from this review are (a) The data in MMLA are classified into digital data, physical data, physiological data, psychometric data, and environment data; (b) The learning indicators are behavior, cognition, emotion, collaboration, and engagement; (c) The relationships between multimodal data and learning indicators are one-to-one, one-to-any, and many-to-one. The complex relationships between multimodal data and learning indicators are the key for data fusion; (d) The main data fusion methods in MMLA are many-to-one, many-to-many and multiple validations among multimodal data; and (e) Multimodal data fusion can be characterized by the multimodality of data, multi-dimension of indicators, and diversity of methods. MDPI 2020-11-30 /pmc/articles/PMC7729570/ /pubmed/33266131 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s20236856 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Mu, Su
Cui, Meng
Huang, Xiaodi
Multimodal Data Fusion in Learning Analytics: A Systematic Review
title Multimodal Data Fusion in Learning Analytics: A Systematic Review
title_full Multimodal Data Fusion in Learning Analytics: A Systematic Review
title_fullStr Multimodal Data Fusion in Learning Analytics: A Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed Multimodal Data Fusion in Learning Analytics: A Systematic Review
title_short Multimodal Data Fusion in Learning Analytics: A Systematic Review
title_sort multimodal data fusion in learning analytics: a systematic review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7729570/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33266131
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s20236856
work_keys_str_mv AT musu multimodaldatafusioninlearninganalyticsasystematicreview
AT cuimeng multimodaldatafusioninlearninganalyticsasystematicreview
AT huangxiaodi multimodaldatafusioninlearninganalyticsasystematicreview