Cargando…
Limited not lazy: a quasi-experimental secondary analysis of evidence quality evaluations by those who hold implausible beliefs
Past research suggests that an uncritical or ‘lazy’ style of evaluating evidence may play a role in the development and maintenance of implausible beliefs. We examine this possibility by using a quasi-experimental design to compare how low- and high-quality evidence is evaluated by those who do and...
Autores principales: | Martire, Kristy A., Growns, Bethany, Bali, Agnes S., Montgomery-Farrer, Bronte, Summersby, Stephanie, Younan, Mariam |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7729693/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33306157 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41235-020-00264-z |
Ejemplares similares
-
Human factors in forensic science: The cognitive mechanisms that underlie forensic feature-comparison expertise
por: Growns, Bethany, et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
Metacognitive Failure as a Feature of Those Holding Radical Beliefs
por: Rollwage, Max, et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
Likeability and Expert Persuasion: Dislikeability Reduces the Perceived Persuasiveness of Expert Evidence
por: Younan, Mariam, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Acceptance of anomalous research findings: explaining treatment implausibility reduces belief in far-fetched results
por: Thompson, W. Burt, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
The Implausibility of Metabolic Cycles on the Prebiotic Earth
por: Orgel, Leslie E
Publicado: (2008)