Cargando…

Nurse‐led group information for patients with breast cancer: Equal to individual information? A comparative study

AIM: To investigate outpatients with breast cancer perception of information before and after changed informational practice. DESIGN: The design was a comparative study. METHOD: Information about breast cancer treatment and chemotherapy toxicity changed from individual to nurse‐led group information...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dieperink, Karin Brochstedt, Ellegaard, Elisabeth, Astrup, Anja Langkjær, Hasse, Henriette Tind, Elnegaard, Caroline Matilde, Jensen, Jeanette Dupont
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7729802/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33318850
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/nop2.643
Descripción
Sumario:AIM: To investigate outpatients with breast cancer perception of information before and after changed informational practice. DESIGN: The design was a comparative study. METHOD: Information about breast cancer treatment and chemotherapy toxicity changed from individual to nurse‐led group information. Women with early‐stage breast cancer were eligible. To evaluate individual versus group information, the patients completed a questionnaire at their third cycle of chemotherapy, including Knowledge of treatment, Support from healthcare professionals or peers and general self‐efficacy Ability to act in everyday life. The study is registered in OSF https://osf.io/bh7wg. RESULTS: In total, 90 participants in two groups were included: (a) individual information (N = 44) and (b) group information (N = 46). Groups were comparable in age and educational level. Both groups found the information satisfactory, with no significant differences regarding perceived knowledge or support. Five of ten questions in self‐efficacy showed significantly better outcomes in patients receiving group information but with no difference in overall self‐efficacy. Group information was non‐inferior compared with individual information. Patients were satisfied in both groups.