Cargando…

Histological and Histomorphometric Evaluation of New Bone Formation after Maxillary Sinus Augmentation with Two Different Osteoconductive Materials: A Randomized, Parallel, Double-Blind Clinical Trial

This study aimed to investigate the histological features of deproteinized equine bone mineral (DEBM) and anorganic bovine bone (ABB) after human sinus augmentation with the lateral approach. Twenty-three sinus augmentations were performed in 16 patients (male: 10/female: 6) using DEBM or ABB in a r...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Grasso, Giuseppe, Mummolo, Stefano, Bernardi, Sara, Pietropaoli, Davide, D’Ambrosio, Giuseppe, Iezzi, Giovanna, Piattelli, Adriano, Bianchi, Serena, Marchetti, Enrico
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7729968/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33287281
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma13235520
_version_ 1783621579145478144
author Grasso, Giuseppe
Mummolo, Stefano
Bernardi, Sara
Pietropaoli, Davide
D’Ambrosio, Giuseppe
Iezzi, Giovanna
Piattelli, Adriano
Bianchi, Serena
Marchetti, Enrico
author_facet Grasso, Giuseppe
Mummolo, Stefano
Bernardi, Sara
Pietropaoli, Davide
D’Ambrosio, Giuseppe
Iezzi, Giovanna
Piattelli, Adriano
Bianchi, Serena
Marchetti, Enrico
author_sort Grasso, Giuseppe
collection PubMed
description This study aimed to investigate the histological features of deproteinized equine bone mineral (DEBM) and anorganic bovine bone (ABB) after human sinus augmentation with the lateral approach. Twenty-three sinus augmentations were performed in 16 patients (male: 10/female: 6) using DEBM or ABB in a randomized fashion. Healing took place over the next 6 months. Bone core biopsies (N = 23) were obtained for each subject prior to placing the dental implants. The biopsies were processed for both histological descriptions and histomorphometric analysis. Statistical analyses were applied as appropriate, defining statistical significance as p < 0.05. Core bone biopsies revealed no differences in terms of newly formed bone between groups, or differences in terms of tissue inflammation. Both DEBM and ABB appear to be suitable biomaterials for bone augmentation in sinus lift surgery in the short term. However, dedicated studies are required to confirm these results and their stability in the long term.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7729968
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77299682020-12-12 Histological and Histomorphometric Evaluation of New Bone Formation after Maxillary Sinus Augmentation with Two Different Osteoconductive Materials: A Randomized, Parallel, Double-Blind Clinical Trial Grasso, Giuseppe Mummolo, Stefano Bernardi, Sara Pietropaoli, Davide D’Ambrosio, Giuseppe Iezzi, Giovanna Piattelli, Adriano Bianchi, Serena Marchetti, Enrico Materials (Basel) Article This study aimed to investigate the histological features of deproteinized equine bone mineral (DEBM) and anorganic bovine bone (ABB) after human sinus augmentation with the lateral approach. Twenty-three sinus augmentations were performed in 16 patients (male: 10/female: 6) using DEBM or ABB in a randomized fashion. Healing took place over the next 6 months. Bone core biopsies (N = 23) were obtained for each subject prior to placing the dental implants. The biopsies were processed for both histological descriptions and histomorphometric analysis. Statistical analyses were applied as appropriate, defining statistical significance as p < 0.05. Core bone biopsies revealed no differences in terms of newly formed bone between groups, or differences in terms of tissue inflammation. Both DEBM and ABB appear to be suitable biomaterials for bone augmentation in sinus lift surgery in the short term. However, dedicated studies are required to confirm these results and their stability in the long term. MDPI 2020-12-03 /pmc/articles/PMC7729968/ /pubmed/33287281 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma13235520 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Grasso, Giuseppe
Mummolo, Stefano
Bernardi, Sara
Pietropaoli, Davide
D’Ambrosio, Giuseppe
Iezzi, Giovanna
Piattelli, Adriano
Bianchi, Serena
Marchetti, Enrico
Histological and Histomorphometric Evaluation of New Bone Formation after Maxillary Sinus Augmentation with Two Different Osteoconductive Materials: A Randomized, Parallel, Double-Blind Clinical Trial
title Histological and Histomorphometric Evaluation of New Bone Formation after Maxillary Sinus Augmentation with Two Different Osteoconductive Materials: A Randomized, Parallel, Double-Blind Clinical Trial
title_full Histological and Histomorphometric Evaluation of New Bone Formation after Maxillary Sinus Augmentation with Two Different Osteoconductive Materials: A Randomized, Parallel, Double-Blind Clinical Trial
title_fullStr Histological and Histomorphometric Evaluation of New Bone Formation after Maxillary Sinus Augmentation with Two Different Osteoconductive Materials: A Randomized, Parallel, Double-Blind Clinical Trial
title_full_unstemmed Histological and Histomorphometric Evaluation of New Bone Formation after Maxillary Sinus Augmentation with Two Different Osteoconductive Materials: A Randomized, Parallel, Double-Blind Clinical Trial
title_short Histological and Histomorphometric Evaluation of New Bone Formation after Maxillary Sinus Augmentation with Two Different Osteoconductive Materials: A Randomized, Parallel, Double-Blind Clinical Trial
title_sort histological and histomorphometric evaluation of new bone formation after maxillary sinus augmentation with two different osteoconductive materials: a randomized, parallel, double-blind clinical trial
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7729968/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33287281
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma13235520
work_keys_str_mv AT grassogiuseppe histologicalandhistomorphometricevaluationofnewboneformationaftermaxillarysinusaugmentationwithtwodifferentosteoconductivematerialsarandomizedparalleldoubleblindclinicaltrial
AT mummolostefano histologicalandhistomorphometricevaluationofnewboneformationaftermaxillarysinusaugmentationwithtwodifferentosteoconductivematerialsarandomizedparalleldoubleblindclinicaltrial
AT bernardisara histologicalandhistomorphometricevaluationofnewboneformationaftermaxillarysinusaugmentationwithtwodifferentosteoconductivematerialsarandomizedparalleldoubleblindclinicaltrial
AT pietropaolidavide histologicalandhistomorphometricevaluationofnewboneformationaftermaxillarysinusaugmentationwithtwodifferentosteoconductivematerialsarandomizedparalleldoubleblindclinicaltrial
AT dambrosiogiuseppe histologicalandhistomorphometricevaluationofnewboneformationaftermaxillarysinusaugmentationwithtwodifferentosteoconductivematerialsarandomizedparalleldoubleblindclinicaltrial
AT iezzigiovanna histologicalandhistomorphometricevaluationofnewboneformationaftermaxillarysinusaugmentationwithtwodifferentosteoconductivematerialsarandomizedparalleldoubleblindclinicaltrial
AT piattelliadriano histologicalandhistomorphometricevaluationofnewboneformationaftermaxillarysinusaugmentationwithtwodifferentosteoconductivematerialsarandomizedparalleldoubleblindclinicaltrial
AT bianchiserena histologicalandhistomorphometricevaluationofnewboneformationaftermaxillarysinusaugmentationwithtwodifferentosteoconductivematerialsarandomizedparalleldoubleblindclinicaltrial
AT marchettienrico histologicalandhistomorphometricevaluationofnewboneformationaftermaxillarysinusaugmentationwithtwodifferentosteoconductivematerialsarandomizedparalleldoubleblindclinicaltrial