Cargando…
Histological and Histomorphometric Evaluation of New Bone Formation after Maxillary Sinus Augmentation with Two Different Osteoconductive Materials: A Randomized, Parallel, Double-Blind Clinical Trial
This study aimed to investigate the histological features of deproteinized equine bone mineral (DEBM) and anorganic bovine bone (ABB) after human sinus augmentation with the lateral approach. Twenty-three sinus augmentations were performed in 16 patients (male: 10/female: 6) using DEBM or ABB in a r...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7729968/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33287281 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma13235520 |
_version_ | 1783621579145478144 |
---|---|
author | Grasso, Giuseppe Mummolo, Stefano Bernardi, Sara Pietropaoli, Davide D’Ambrosio, Giuseppe Iezzi, Giovanna Piattelli, Adriano Bianchi, Serena Marchetti, Enrico |
author_facet | Grasso, Giuseppe Mummolo, Stefano Bernardi, Sara Pietropaoli, Davide D’Ambrosio, Giuseppe Iezzi, Giovanna Piattelli, Adriano Bianchi, Serena Marchetti, Enrico |
author_sort | Grasso, Giuseppe |
collection | PubMed |
description | This study aimed to investigate the histological features of deproteinized equine bone mineral (DEBM) and anorganic bovine bone (ABB) after human sinus augmentation with the lateral approach. Twenty-three sinus augmentations were performed in 16 patients (male: 10/female: 6) using DEBM or ABB in a randomized fashion. Healing took place over the next 6 months. Bone core biopsies (N = 23) were obtained for each subject prior to placing the dental implants. The biopsies were processed for both histological descriptions and histomorphometric analysis. Statistical analyses were applied as appropriate, defining statistical significance as p < 0.05. Core bone biopsies revealed no differences in terms of newly formed bone between groups, or differences in terms of tissue inflammation. Both DEBM and ABB appear to be suitable biomaterials for bone augmentation in sinus lift surgery in the short term. However, dedicated studies are required to confirm these results and their stability in the long term. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7729968 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-77299682020-12-12 Histological and Histomorphometric Evaluation of New Bone Formation after Maxillary Sinus Augmentation with Two Different Osteoconductive Materials: A Randomized, Parallel, Double-Blind Clinical Trial Grasso, Giuseppe Mummolo, Stefano Bernardi, Sara Pietropaoli, Davide D’Ambrosio, Giuseppe Iezzi, Giovanna Piattelli, Adriano Bianchi, Serena Marchetti, Enrico Materials (Basel) Article This study aimed to investigate the histological features of deproteinized equine bone mineral (DEBM) and anorganic bovine bone (ABB) after human sinus augmentation with the lateral approach. Twenty-three sinus augmentations were performed in 16 patients (male: 10/female: 6) using DEBM or ABB in a randomized fashion. Healing took place over the next 6 months. Bone core biopsies (N = 23) were obtained for each subject prior to placing the dental implants. The biopsies were processed for both histological descriptions and histomorphometric analysis. Statistical analyses were applied as appropriate, defining statistical significance as p < 0.05. Core bone biopsies revealed no differences in terms of newly formed bone between groups, or differences in terms of tissue inflammation. Both DEBM and ABB appear to be suitable biomaterials for bone augmentation in sinus lift surgery in the short term. However, dedicated studies are required to confirm these results and their stability in the long term. MDPI 2020-12-03 /pmc/articles/PMC7729968/ /pubmed/33287281 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma13235520 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Grasso, Giuseppe Mummolo, Stefano Bernardi, Sara Pietropaoli, Davide D’Ambrosio, Giuseppe Iezzi, Giovanna Piattelli, Adriano Bianchi, Serena Marchetti, Enrico Histological and Histomorphometric Evaluation of New Bone Formation after Maxillary Sinus Augmentation with Two Different Osteoconductive Materials: A Randomized, Parallel, Double-Blind Clinical Trial |
title | Histological and Histomorphometric Evaluation of New Bone Formation after Maxillary Sinus Augmentation with Two Different Osteoconductive Materials: A Randomized, Parallel, Double-Blind Clinical Trial |
title_full | Histological and Histomorphometric Evaluation of New Bone Formation after Maxillary Sinus Augmentation with Two Different Osteoconductive Materials: A Randomized, Parallel, Double-Blind Clinical Trial |
title_fullStr | Histological and Histomorphometric Evaluation of New Bone Formation after Maxillary Sinus Augmentation with Two Different Osteoconductive Materials: A Randomized, Parallel, Double-Blind Clinical Trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Histological and Histomorphometric Evaluation of New Bone Formation after Maxillary Sinus Augmentation with Two Different Osteoconductive Materials: A Randomized, Parallel, Double-Blind Clinical Trial |
title_short | Histological and Histomorphometric Evaluation of New Bone Formation after Maxillary Sinus Augmentation with Two Different Osteoconductive Materials: A Randomized, Parallel, Double-Blind Clinical Trial |
title_sort | histological and histomorphometric evaluation of new bone formation after maxillary sinus augmentation with two different osteoconductive materials: a randomized, parallel, double-blind clinical trial |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7729968/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33287281 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma13235520 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT grassogiuseppe histologicalandhistomorphometricevaluationofnewboneformationaftermaxillarysinusaugmentationwithtwodifferentosteoconductivematerialsarandomizedparalleldoubleblindclinicaltrial AT mummolostefano histologicalandhistomorphometricevaluationofnewboneformationaftermaxillarysinusaugmentationwithtwodifferentosteoconductivematerialsarandomizedparalleldoubleblindclinicaltrial AT bernardisara histologicalandhistomorphometricevaluationofnewboneformationaftermaxillarysinusaugmentationwithtwodifferentosteoconductivematerialsarandomizedparalleldoubleblindclinicaltrial AT pietropaolidavide histologicalandhistomorphometricevaluationofnewboneformationaftermaxillarysinusaugmentationwithtwodifferentosteoconductivematerialsarandomizedparalleldoubleblindclinicaltrial AT dambrosiogiuseppe histologicalandhistomorphometricevaluationofnewboneformationaftermaxillarysinusaugmentationwithtwodifferentosteoconductivematerialsarandomizedparalleldoubleblindclinicaltrial AT iezzigiovanna histologicalandhistomorphometricevaluationofnewboneformationaftermaxillarysinusaugmentationwithtwodifferentosteoconductivematerialsarandomizedparalleldoubleblindclinicaltrial AT piattelliadriano histologicalandhistomorphometricevaluationofnewboneformationaftermaxillarysinusaugmentationwithtwodifferentosteoconductivematerialsarandomizedparalleldoubleblindclinicaltrial AT bianchiserena histologicalandhistomorphometricevaluationofnewboneformationaftermaxillarysinusaugmentationwithtwodifferentosteoconductivematerialsarandomizedparalleldoubleblindclinicaltrial AT marchettienrico histologicalandhistomorphometricevaluationofnewboneformationaftermaxillarysinusaugmentationwithtwodifferentosteoconductivematerialsarandomizedparalleldoubleblindclinicaltrial |