Cargando…
Comparison of Electropolishing of Aluminum in a Deep Eutectic Medium and Acidic Electrolyte
Research advances in electropolishing, with respect to the field of metalworking, have afforded significant improvements in the surface roughness and conductivity properties of aluminum polished surfaces in ways that machine polishing and simple chemical polishing cannot. The effects of a deep eutec...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7730155/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33287431 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/molecules25235712 |
_version_ | 1783621618524749824 |
---|---|
author | Abdel-Fattah, Tarek M. Loftis, J. Derek |
author_facet | Abdel-Fattah, Tarek M. Loftis, J. Derek |
author_sort | Abdel-Fattah, Tarek M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Research advances in electropolishing, with respect to the field of metalworking, have afforded significant improvements in the surface roughness and conductivity properties of aluminum polished surfaces in ways that machine polishing and simple chemical polishing cannot. The effects of a deep eutectic medium as an acid-free electrolyte were tested to determine the potential energy thresholds during electropolishing treatments based upon temperature, experiment duration, current, and voltage. Using voltammetry and chronoamperometry tests during electropolishing to supplement representative recordings via atomic force microscopy (AFM), surface morphology comparisons were performed regarding the electropolishing efficiency of phosphoric acid and acid-free ionic liquid treatments for aluminum. This eco-friendly solution produced polished surfaces superior to those surfaces treated with industry standard acid electrochemistry treatments of 1 M phosphoric acid. The roughness average of the as-received sample became 6.11 times smoother, improving from 159 nm to 26 nm when electropolished with the deep eutectic solvent. This result was accompanied by a mass loss of 0.039 g and a 7.2 µm change in step height along the edge of the electropolishing interface, whereas the acid treatment resulted in a slight improvement in surface roughness, becoming 1.63 times smoother with an average post-electropolishing roughness of 97.7 nm, yielding a mass loss of 0.0458 g and a step height of 8.1 µm. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7730155 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-77301552020-12-12 Comparison of Electropolishing of Aluminum in a Deep Eutectic Medium and Acidic Electrolyte Abdel-Fattah, Tarek M. Loftis, J. Derek Molecules Article Research advances in electropolishing, with respect to the field of metalworking, have afforded significant improvements in the surface roughness and conductivity properties of aluminum polished surfaces in ways that machine polishing and simple chemical polishing cannot. The effects of a deep eutectic medium as an acid-free electrolyte were tested to determine the potential energy thresholds during electropolishing treatments based upon temperature, experiment duration, current, and voltage. Using voltammetry and chronoamperometry tests during electropolishing to supplement representative recordings via atomic force microscopy (AFM), surface morphology comparisons were performed regarding the electropolishing efficiency of phosphoric acid and acid-free ionic liquid treatments for aluminum. This eco-friendly solution produced polished surfaces superior to those surfaces treated with industry standard acid electrochemistry treatments of 1 M phosphoric acid. The roughness average of the as-received sample became 6.11 times smoother, improving from 159 nm to 26 nm when electropolished with the deep eutectic solvent. This result was accompanied by a mass loss of 0.039 g and a 7.2 µm change in step height along the edge of the electropolishing interface, whereas the acid treatment resulted in a slight improvement in surface roughness, becoming 1.63 times smoother with an average post-electropolishing roughness of 97.7 nm, yielding a mass loss of 0.0458 g and a step height of 8.1 µm. MDPI 2020-12-03 /pmc/articles/PMC7730155/ /pubmed/33287431 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/molecules25235712 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Abdel-Fattah, Tarek M. Loftis, J. Derek Comparison of Electropolishing of Aluminum in a Deep Eutectic Medium and Acidic Electrolyte |
title | Comparison of Electropolishing of Aluminum in a Deep Eutectic Medium and Acidic Electrolyte |
title_full | Comparison of Electropolishing of Aluminum in a Deep Eutectic Medium and Acidic Electrolyte |
title_fullStr | Comparison of Electropolishing of Aluminum in a Deep Eutectic Medium and Acidic Electrolyte |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of Electropolishing of Aluminum in a Deep Eutectic Medium and Acidic Electrolyte |
title_short | Comparison of Electropolishing of Aluminum in a Deep Eutectic Medium and Acidic Electrolyte |
title_sort | comparison of electropolishing of aluminum in a deep eutectic medium and acidic electrolyte |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7730155/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33287431 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/molecules25235712 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT abdelfattahtarekm comparisonofelectropolishingofaluminuminadeepeutecticmediumandacidicelectrolyte AT loftisjderek comparisonofelectropolishingofaluminuminadeepeutecticmediumandacidicelectrolyte |