Cargando…
Capabilities and Limitations of Fire-Shaping to Produce Glass Nozzles
Microfluidic devices for drop and emulsion production are often built using fire-shaped (or fire-polished) glass nozzles. These are usually fabricated manually with inexpensive equipment. The shape limitations and poor reproducibility are pointed as the main drawbacks. Here, we evaluate the capabili...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7730331/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33271928 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma13235477 |
_version_ | 1783621659119321088 |
---|---|
author | Rubio, Alejandro Rodríguez, Sergio Cabezas, Maria G. |
author_facet | Rubio, Alejandro Rodríguez, Sergio Cabezas, Maria G. |
author_sort | Rubio, Alejandro |
collection | PubMed |
description | Microfluidic devices for drop and emulsion production are often built using fire-shaped (or fire-polished) glass nozzles. These are usually fabricated manually with inexpensive equipment. The shape limitations and poor reproducibility are pointed as the main drawbacks. Here, we evaluate the capabilities of a new fire-shaping approach which fabricates the nozzle by heating a vertical rotating capillary at the Bottom of a Lateral Flame (BLF). We analyze the effect of the heating conditions, and the capillary size and tolerances. The shape reproducibility is excellent for nozzles of the same size produced with the same conditions. However, the size reproducibility is limited and does not seem to be significantly affected by the heating conditions. Specifically, the minimum neck diameter standard deviation is 3%. Different shapes can be obtained by changing the heating position or the capillary dimensions, though, for a given diameter reduction, there is a minimum nozzle length due to the overturning of the surface. The use of thinner (wall or inner diameter) capillaries allows producing much shorter nozzles but hinders the size reproducibility. Finally, we showed an example of how the performance of a microfluidic device is affected by the nozzle shape: a Gas Dynamic Virtual Nozzle (GDVN) built with a higher convergent rate nozzle works over a wider parametric range without whipping. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7730331 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-77303312020-12-12 Capabilities and Limitations of Fire-Shaping to Produce Glass Nozzles Rubio, Alejandro Rodríguez, Sergio Cabezas, Maria G. Materials (Basel) Article Microfluidic devices for drop and emulsion production are often built using fire-shaped (or fire-polished) glass nozzles. These are usually fabricated manually with inexpensive equipment. The shape limitations and poor reproducibility are pointed as the main drawbacks. Here, we evaluate the capabilities of a new fire-shaping approach which fabricates the nozzle by heating a vertical rotating capillary at the Bottom of a Lateral Flame (BLF). We analyze the effect of the heating conditions, and the capillary size and tolerances. The shape reproducibility is excellent for nozzles of the same size produced with the same conditions. However, the size reproducibility is limited and does not seem to be significantly affected by the heating conditions. Specifically, the minimum neck diameter standard deviation is 3%. Different shapes can be obtained by changing the heating position or the capillary dimensions, though, for a given diameter reduction, there is a minimum nozzle length due to the overturning of the surface. The use of thinner (wall or inner diameter) capillaries allows producing much shorter nozzles but hinders the size reproducibility. Finally, we showed an example of how the performance of a microfluidic device is affected by the nozzle shape: a Gas Dynamic Virtual Nozzle (GDVN) built with a higher convergent rate nozzle works over a wider parametric range without whipping. MDPI 2020-12-01 /pmc/articles/PMC7730331/ /pubmed/33271928 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma13235477 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Rubio, Alejandro Rodríguez, Sergio Cabezas, Maria G. Capabilities and Limitations of Fire-Shaping to Produce Glass Nozzles |
title | Capabilities and Limitations of Fire-Shaping to Produce Glass Nozzles |
title_full | Capabilities and Limitations of Fire-Shaping to Produce Glass Nozzles |
title_fullStr | Capabilities and Limitations of Fire-Shaping to Produce Glass Nozzles |
title_full_unstemmed | Capabilities and Limitations of Fire-Shaping to Produce Glass Nozzles |
title_short | Capabilities and Limitations of Fire-Shaping to Produce Glass Nozzles |
title_sort | capabilities and limitations of fire-shaping to produce glass nozzles |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7730331/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33271928 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma13235477 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rubioalejandro capabilitiesandlimitationsoffireshapingtoproduceglassnozzles AT rodriguezsergio capabilitiesandlimitationsoffireshapingtoproduceglassnozzles AT cabezasmariag capabilitiesandlimitationsoffireshapingtoproduceglassnozzles |