Cargando…

Capabilities and Limitations of Fire-Shaping to Produce Glass Nozzles

Microfluidic devices for drop and emulsion production are often built using fire-shaped (or fire-polished) glass nozzles. These are usually fabricated manually with inexpensive equipment. The shape limitations and poor reproducibility are pointed as the main drawbacks. Here, we evaluate the capabili...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rubio, Alejandro, Rodríguez, Sergio, Cabezas, Maria G.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7730331/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33271928
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma13235477
_version_ 1783621659119321088
author Rubio, Alejandro
Rodríguez, Sergio
Cabezas, Maria G.
author_facet Rubio, Alejandro
Rodríguez, Sergio
Cabezas, Maria G.
author_sort Rubio, Alejandro
collection PubMed
description Microfluidic devices for drop and emulsion production are often built using fire-shaped (or fire-polished) glass nozzles. These are usually fabricated manually with inexpensive equipment. The shape limitations and poor reproducibility are pointed as the main drawbacks. Here, we evaluate the capabilities of a new fire-shaping approach which fabricates the nozzle by heating a vertical rotating capillary at the Bottom of a Lateral Flame (BLF). We analyze the effect of the heating conditions, and the capillary size and tolerances. The shape reproducibility is excellent for nozzles of the same size produced with the same conditions. However, the size reproducibility is limited and does not seem to be significantly affected by the heating conditions. Specifically, the minimum neck diameter standard deviation is 3%. Different shapes can be obtained by changing the heating position or the capillary dimensions, though, for a given diameter reduction, there is a minimum nozzle length due to the overturning of the surface. The use of thinner (wall or inner diameter) capillaries allows producing much shorter nozzles but hinders the size reproducibility. Finally, we showed an example of how the performance of a microfluidic device is affected by the nozzle shape: a Gas Dynamic Virtual Nozzle (GDVN) built with a higher convergent rate nozzle works over a wider parametric range without whipping.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7730331
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77303312020-12-12 Capabilities and Limitations of Fire-Shaping to Produce Glass Nozzles Rubio, Alejandro Rodríguez, Sergio Cabezas, Maria G. Materials (Basel) Article Microfluidic devices for drop and emulsion production are often built using fire-shaped (or fire-polished) glass nozzles. These are usually fabricated manually with inexpensive equipment. The shape limitations and poor reproducibility are pointed as the main drawbacks. Here, we evaluate the capabilities of a new fire-shaping approach which fabricates the nozzle by heating a vertical rotating capillary at the Bottom of a Lateral Flame (BLF). We analyze the effect of the heating conditions, and the capillary size and tolerances. The shape reproducibility is excellent for nozzles of the same size produced with the same conditions. However, the size reproducibility is limited and does not seem to be significantly affected by the heating conditions. Specifically, the minimum neck diameter standard deviation is 3%. Different shapes can be obtained by changing the heating position or the capillary dimensions, though, for a given diameter reduction, there is a minimum nozzle length due to the overturning of the surface. The use of thinner (wall or inner diameter) capillaries allows producing much shorter nozzles but hinders the size reproducibility. Finally, we showed an example of how the performance of a microfluidic device is affected by the nozzle shape: a Gas Dynamic Virtual Nozzle (GDVN) built with a higher convergent rate nozzle works over a wider parametric range without whipping. MDPI 2020-12-01 /pmc/articles/PMC7730331/ /pubmed/33271928 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma13235477 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Rubio, Alejandro
Rodríguez, Sergio
Cabezas, Maria G.
Capabilities and Limitations of Fire-Shaping to Produce Glass Nozzles
title Capabilities and Limitations of Fire-Shaping to Produce Glass Nozzles
title_full Capabilities and Limitations of Fire-Shaping to Produce Glass Nozzles
title_fullStr Capabilities and Limitations of Fire-Shaping to Produce Glass Nozzles
title_full_unstemmed Capabilities and Limitations of Fire-Shaping to Produce Glass Nozzles
title_short Capabilities and Limitations of Fire-Shaping to Produce Glass Nozzles
title_sort capabilities and limitations of fire-shaping to produce glass nozzles
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7730331/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33271928
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma13235477
work_keys_str_mv AT rubioalejandro capabilitiesandlimitationsoffireshapingtoproduceglassnozzles
AT rodriguezsergio capabilitiesandlimitationsoffireshapingtoproduceglassnozzles
AT cabezasmariag capabilitiesandlimitationsoffireshapingtoproduceglassnozzles