Cargando…

Development and Validation of Open-Source Activity Intensity Count and Activity Intensity Classification Algorithms from Raw Acceleration Signals of Wearable Sensors

Background: A popular outcome in rehabilitation studies is the activity intensity count, which is typically measured from commercially available accelerometers. However, the algorithms are not openly available, which impairs long-term follow-ups and restricts the potential to adapt the algorithms fo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Poitras, Isabelle, Clouâtre, Jade, Bouyer, Laurent J., Routhier, François, Mercier, Catherine, Campeau-Lecours, Alexandre
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7730347/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33256127
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s20236767
_version_ 1783621662881611776
author Poitras, Isabelle
Clouâtre, Jade
Bouyer, Laurent J.
Routhier, François
Mercier, Catherine
Campeau-Lecours, Alexandre
author_facet Poitras, Isabelle
Clouâtre, Jade
Bouyer, Laurent J.
Routhier, François
Mercier, Catherine
Campeau-Lecours, Alexandre
author_sort Poitras, Isabelle
collection PubMed
description Background: A popular outcome in rehabilitation studies is the activity intensity count, which is typically measured from commercially available accelerometers. However, the algorithms are not openly available, which impairs long-term follow-ups and restricts the potential to adapt the algorithms for pathological populations. The objectives of this research are to design and validate open-source algorithms for activity intensity quantification and classification. Methods: Two versions of a quantification algorithm are proposed (fixed [FB] and modifiable bandwidth [MB]) along with two versions of a classification algorithm (discrete [DM] vs. continuous methods [CM]). The results of these algorithms were compared to those of a commercial activity intensity count solution (ActiLife) with datasets from four activities (n = 24 participants). Results: The FB and MB algorithms gave similar results as ActiLife (r > 0.96). The DM algorithm is similar to a ActiLife (r ≥ 0.99). The CM algorithm differs (r ≥ 0.89) but is more precise. Conclusion: The combination of the FB algorithm with the DM results is a solution close to that of ActiLife. However, the MB version remains valid while being more adaptable, and the CM is more precise. This paper proposes an open-source alternative for rehabilitation that is compatible with several wearable devices and not dependent on manufacturer commercial decisions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7730347
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77303472020-12-12 Development and Validation of Open-Source Activity Intensity Count and Activity Intensity Classification Algorithms from Raw Acceleration Signals of Wearable Sensors Poitras, Isabelle Clouâtre, Jade Bouyer, Laurent J. Routhier, François Mercier, Catherine Campeau-Lecours, Alexandre Sensors (Basel) Article Background: A popular outcome in rehabilitation studies is the activity intensity count, which is typically measured from commercially available accelerometers. However, the algorithms are not openly available, which impairs long-term follow-ups and restricts the potential to adapt the algorithms for pathological populations. The objectives of this research are to design and validate open-source algorithms for activity intensity quantification and classification. Methods: Two versions of a quantification algorithm are proposed (fixed [FB] and modifiable bandwidth [MB]) along with two versions of a classification algorithm (discrete [DM] vs. continuous methods [CM]). The results of these algorithms were compared to those of a commercial activity intensity count solution (ActiLife) with datasets from four activities (n = 24 participants). Results: The FB and MB algorithms gave similar results as ActiLife (r > 0.96). The DM algorithm is similar to a ActiLife (r ≥ 0.99). The CM algorithm differs (r ≥ 0.89) but is more precise. Conclusion: The combination of the FB algorithm with the DM results is a solution close to that of ActiLife. However, the MB version remains valid while being more adaptable, and the CM is more precise. This paper proposes an open-source alternative for rehabilitation that is compatible with several wearable devices and not dependent on manufacturer commercial decisions. MDPI 2020-11-26 /pmc/articles/PMC7730347/ /pubmed/33256127 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s20236767 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Poitras, Isabelle
Clouâtre, Jade
Bouyer, Laurent J.
Routhier, François
Mercier, Catherine
Campeau-Lecours, Alexandre
Development and Validation of Open-Source Activity Intensity Count and Activity Intensity Classification Algorithms from Raw Acceleration Signals of Wearable Sensors
title Development and Validation of Open-Source Activity Intensity Count and Activity Intensity Classification Algorithms from Raw Acceleration Signals of Wearable Sensors
title_full Development and Validation of Open-Source Activity Intensity Count and Activity Intensity Classification Algorithms from Raw Acceleration Signals of Wearable Sensors
title_fullStr Development and Validation of Open-Source Activity Intensity Count and Activity Intensity Classification Algorithms from Raw Acceleration Signals of Wearable Sensors
title_full_unstemmed Development and Validation of Open-Source Activity Intensity Count and Activity Intensity Classification Algorithms from Raw Acceleration Signals of Wearable Sensors
title_short Development and Validation of Open-Source Activity Intensity Count and Activity Intensity Classification Algorithms from Raw Acceleration Signals of Wearable Sensors
title_sort development and validation of open-source activity intensity count and activity intensity classification algorithms from raw acceleration signals of wearable sensors
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7730347/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33256127
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s20236767
work_keys_str_mv AT poitrasisabelle developmentandvalidationofopensourceactivityintensitycountandactivityintensityclassificationalgorithmsfromrawaccelerationsignalsofwearablesensors
AT clouatrejade developmentandvalidationofopensourceactivityintensitycountandactivityintensityclassificationalgorithmsfromrawaccelerationsignalsofwearablesensors
AT bouyerlaurentj developmentandvalidationofopensourceactivityintensitycountandactivityintensityclassificationalgorithmsfromrawaccelerationsignalsofwearablesensors
AT routhierfrancois developmentandvalidationofopensourceactivityintensitycountandactivityintensityclassificationalgorithmsfromrawaccelerationsignalsofwearablesensors
AT merciercatherine developmentandvalidationofopensourceactivityintensitycountandactivityintensityclassificationalgorithmsfromrawaccelerationsignalsofwearablesensors
AT campeaulecoursalexandre developmentandvalidationofopensourceactivityintensitycountandactivityintensityclassificationalgorithmsfromrawaccelerationsignalsofwearablesensors