Cargando…
Development and Validation of Open-Source Activity Intensity Count and Activity Intensity Classification Algorithms from Raw Acceleration Signals of Wearable Sensors
Background: A popular outcome in rehabilitation studies is the activity intensity count, which is typically measured from commercially available accelerometers. However, the algorithms are not openly available, which impairs long-term follow-ups and restricts the potential to adapt the algorithms fo...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7730347/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33256127 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s20236767 |
_version_ | 1783621662881611776 |
---|---|
author | Poitras, Isabelle Clouâtre, Jade Bouyer, Laurent J. Routhier, François Mercier, Catherine Campeau-Lecours, Alexandre |
author_facet | Poitras, Isabelle Clouâtre, Jade Bouyer, Laurent J. Routhier, François Mercier, Catherine Campeau-Lecours, Alexandre |
author_sort | Poitras, Isabelle |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background: A popular outcome in rehabilitation studies is the activity intensity count, which is typically measured from commercially available accelerometers. However, the algorithms are not openly available, which impairs long-term follow-ups and restricts the potential to adapt the algorithms for pathological populations. The objectives of this research are to design and validate open-source algorithms for activity intensity quantification and classification. Methods: Two versions of a quantification algorithm are proposed (fixed [FB] and modifiable bandwidth [MB]) along with two versions of a classification algorithm (discrete [DM] vs. continuous methods [CM]). The results of these algorithms were compared to those of a commercial activity intensity count solution (ActiLife) with datasets from four activities (n = 24 participants). Results: The FB and MB algorithms gave similar results as ActiLife (r > 0.96). The DM algorithm is similar to a ActiLife (r ≥ 0.99). The CM algorithm differs (r ≥ 0.89) but is more precise. Conclusion: The combination of the FB algorithm with the DM results is a solution close to that of ActiLife. However, the MB version remains valid while being more adaptable, and the CM is more precise. This paper proposes an open-source alternative for rehabilitation that is compatible with several wearable devices and not dependent on manufacturer commercial decisions. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7730347 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-77303472020-12-12 Development and Validation of Open-Source Activity Intensity Count and Activity Intensity Classification Algorithms from Raw Acceleration Signals of Wearable Sensors Poitras, Isabelle Clouâtre, Jade Bouyer, Laurent J. Routhier, François Mercier, Catherine Campeau-Lecours, Alexandre Sensors (Basel) Article Background: A popular outcome in rehabilitation studies is the activity intensity count, which is typically measured from commercially available accelerometers. However, the algorithms are not openly available, which impairs long-term follow-ups and restricts the potential to adapt the algorithms for pathological populations. The objectives of this research are to design and validate open-source algorithms for activity intensity quantification and classification. Methods: Two versions of a quantification algorithm are proposed (fixed [FB] and modifiable bandwidth [MB]) along with two versions of a classification algorithm (discrete [DM] vs. continuous methods [CM]). The results of these algorithms were compared to those of a commercial activity intensity count solution (ActiLife) with datasets from four activities (n = 24 participants). Results: The FB and MB algorithms gave similar results as ActiLife (r > 0.96). The DM algorithm is similar to a ActiLife (r ≥ 0.99). The CM algorithm differs (r ≥ 0.89) but is more precise. Conclusion: The combination of the FB algorithm with the DM results is a solution close to that of ActiLife. However, the MB version remains valid while being more adaptable, and the CM is more precise. This paper proposes an open-source alternative for rehabilitation that is compatible with several wearable devices and not dependent on manufacturer commercial decisions. MDPI 2020-11-26 /pmc/articles/PMC7730347/ /pubmed/33256127 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s20236767 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Poitras, Isabelle Clouâtre, Jade Bouyer, Laurent J. Routhier, François Mercier, Catherine Campeau-Lecours, Alexandre Development and Validation of Open-Source Activity Intensity Count and Activity Intensity Classification Algorithms from Raw Acceleration Signals of Wearable Sensors |
title | Development and Validation of Open-Source Activity Intensity Count and Activity Intensity Classification Algorithms from Raw Acceleration Signals of Wearable Sensors |
title_full | Development and Validation of Open-Source Activity Intensity Count and Activity Intensity Classification Algorithms from Raw Acceleration Signals of Wearable Sensors |
title_fullStr | Development and Validation of Open-Source Activity Intensity Count and Activity Intensity Classification Algorithms from Raw Acceleration Signals of Wearable Sensors |
title_full_unstemmed | Development and Validation of Open-Source Activity Intensity Count and Activity Intensity Classification Algorithms from Raw Acceleration Signals of Wearable Sensors |
title_short | Development and Validation of Open-Source Activity Intensity Count and Activity Intensity Classification Algorithms from Raw Acceleration Signals of Wearable Sensors |
title_sort | development and validation of open-source activity intensity count and activity intensity classification algorithms from raw acceleration signals of wearable sensors |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7730347/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33256127 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s20236767 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT poitrasisabelle developmentandvalidationofopensourceactivityintensitycountandactivityintensityclassificationalgorithmsfromrawaccelerationsignalsofwearablesensors AT clouatrejade developmentandvalidationofopensourceactivityintensitycountandactivityintensityclassificationalgorithmsfromrawaccelerationsignalsofwearablesensors AT bouyerlaurentj developmentandvalidationofopensourceactivityintensitycountandactivityintensityclassificationalgorithmsfromrawaccelerationsignalsofwearablesensors AT routhierfrancois developmentandvalidationofopensourceactivityintensitycountandactivityintensityclassificationalgorithmsfromrawaccelerationsignalsofwearablesensors AT merciercatherine developmentandvalidationofopensourceactivityintensitycountandactivityintensityclassificationalgorithmsfromrawaccelerationsignalsofwearablesensors AT campeaulecoursalexandre developmentandvalidationofopensourceactivityintensitycountandactivityintensityclassificationalgorithmsfromrawaccelerationsignalsofwearablesensors |