Cargando…

Flicker fusion thresholds as a clinical identifier of a magnocellular-deficit dyslexic subgroup

The magnocellular-dorsal system is well isolated by high temporal frequency. However, temporal processing thresholds have seldom been explored in developmental dyslexia nor its subtypes. Hence, performances on two, four-alternative forced-choice achromatic flicker fusion threshold tasks modulated at...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Peters, Jessica L., Bavin, Edith L., Brown, Alyse, Crewther, David P., Crewther, Sheila G.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7730401/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33303835
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-78552-3
_version_ 1783621675721424896
author Peters, Jessica L.
Bavin, Edith L.
Brown, Alyse
Crewther, David P.
Crewther, Sheila G.
author_facet Peters, Jessica L.
Bavin, Edith L.
Brown, Alyse
Crewther, David P.
Crewther, Sheila G.
author_sort Peters, Jessica L.
collection PubMed
description The magnocellular-dorsal system is well isolated by high temporal frequency. However, temporal processing thresholds have seldom been explored in developmental dyslexia nor its subtypes. Hence, performances on two, four-alternative forced-choice achromatic flicker fusion threshold tasks modulated at low (5%) and high (75%) temporal contrast were compared in dyslexic and neurotypical children individually matched for age and intelligence (8–12 years, n = 54 per group). As expected, the higher modulation resulted in higher flicker fusion thresholds in both groups. Compared to neurotypicals, the dyslexic group displayed significantly lower ability to detect flicker at high temporal frequencies, both at low and high temporal contrast. Yet, discriminant analysis did not adequately distinguish the dyslexics from neurotypicals, on the basis of flicker thresholds alone. Rather, two distinct dyslexic subgroups were identified by cluster analysis – one characterised by significantly lower temporal frequency thresholds than neurotypicals (referred to as ‘Magnocellular-Deficit’ dyslexics; 53.7%), while the other group (‘Magnocellular-Typical’ dyslexics; 46.3%) had comparable thresholds to neurotypicals. The two dyslexic subgroups were not differentially associated with phonological or naming speed subtypes and showed comparable mean reading rate impairments. However, correlations between low modulation flicker fusion threshold and reading rate for the two subgroups were significantly different (p = .0009). Flicker fusion threshold performances also showed strong classification accuracy (79.3%) in dissociating the Magnocellular-Deficit dyslexics and neurotypicals. We propose that temporal visual processing impairments characterize a previously unidentified subgroup of dyslexia and suggest that measurement of flicker fusion thresholds could be used clinically to assist early diagnosis and appropriate treatment recommendations for dyslexia.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7730401
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77304012020-12-14 Flicker fusion thresholds as a clinical identifier of a magnocellular-deficit dyslexic subgroup Peters, Jessica L. Bavin, Edith L. Brown, Alyse Crewther, David P. Crewther, Sheila G. Sci Rep Article The magnocellular-dorsal system is well isolated by high temporal frequency. However, temporal processing thresholds have seldom been explored in developmental dyslexia nor its subtypes. Hence, performances on two, four-alternative forced-choice achromatic flicker fusion threshold tasks modulated at low (5%) and high (75%) temporal contrast were compared in dyslexic and neurotypical children individually matched for age and intelligence (8–12 years, n = 54 per group). As expected, the higher modulation resulted in higher flicker fusion thresholds in both groups. Compared to neurotypicals, the dyslexic group displayed significantly lower ability to detect flicker at high temporal frequencies, both at low and high temporal contrast. Yet, discriminant analysis did not adequately distinguish the dyslexics from neurotypicals, on the basis of flicker thresholds alone. Rather, two distinct dyslexic subgroups were identified by cluster analysis – one characterised by significantly lower temporal frequency thresholds than neurotypicals (referred to as ‘Magnocellular-Deficit’ dyslexics; 53.7%), while the other group (‘Magnocellular-Typical’ dyslexics; 46.3%) had comparable thresholds to neurotypicals. The two dyslexic subgroups were not differentially associated with phonological or naming speed subtypes and showed comparable mean reading rate impairments. However, correlations between low modulation flicker fusion threshold and reading rate for the two subgroups were significantly different (p = .0009). Flicker fusion threshold performances also showed strong classification accuracy (79.3%) in dissociating the Magnocellular-Deficit dyslexics and neurotypicals. We propose that temporal visual processing impairments characterize a previously unidentified subgroup of dyslexia and suggest that measurement of flicker fusion thresholds could be used clinically to assist early diagnosis and appropriate treatment recommendations for dyslexia. Nature Publishing Group UK 2020-12-10 /pmc/articles/PMC7730401/ /pubmed/33303835 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-78552-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Peters, Jessica L.
Bavin, Edith L.
Brown, Alyse
Crewther, David P.
Crewther, Sheila G.
Flicker fusion thresholds as a clinical identifier of a magnocellular-deficit dyslexic subgroup
title Flicker fusion thresholds as a clinical identifier of a magnocellular-deficit dyslexic subgroup
title_full Flicker fusion thresholds as a clinical identifier of a magnocellular-deficit dyslexic subgroup
title_fullStr Flicker fusion thresholds as a clinical identifier of a magnocellular-deficit dyslexic subgroup
title_full_unstemmed Flicker fusion thresholds as a clinical identifier of a magnocellular-deficit dyslexic subgroup
title_short Flicker fusion thresholds as a clinical identifier of a magnocellular-deficit dyslexic subgroup
title_sort flicker fusion thresholds as a clinical identifier of a magnocellular-deficit dyslexic subgroup
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7730401/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33303835
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-78552-3
work_keys_str_mv AT petersjessical flickerfusionthresholdsasaclinicalidentifierofamagnocellulardeficitdyslexicsubgroup
AT bavinedithl flickerfusionthresholdsasaclinicalidentifierofamagnocellulardeficitdyslexicsubgroup
AT brownalyse flickerfusionthresholdsasaclinicalidentifierofamagnocellulardeficitdyslexicsubgroup
AT crewtherdavidp flickerfusionthresholdsasaclinicalidentifierofamagnocellulardeficitdyslexicsubgroup
AT crewthersheilag flickerfusionthresholdsasaclinicalidentifierofamagnocellulardeficitdyslexicsubgroup