Cargando…

Etiology and outcomes of current posterior chamber phakic intraocular lens extraction

This study was aimed to review the etiology and the outcomes of current posterior chamber phakic intraocular lens (Visian ICL, STAAR Surgical) extraction. This review comprised 770 eyes of 403 consecutive patients undergoing ICL extraction. We evaluated prevalence, etiology, uncorrected distance vis...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hayakawa, Hideki, Kamiya, Kazutaka, Ando, Wakako, Takahashi, Masahide, Shoji, Nobuyuki
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7730447/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33303807
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-78661-z
_version_ 1783621686598303744
author Hayakawa, Hideki
Kamiya, Kazutaka
Ando, Wakako
Takahashi, Masahide
Shoji, Nobuyuki
author_facet Hayakawa, Hideki
Kamiya, Kazutaka
Ando, Wakako
Takahashi, Masahide
Shoji, Nobuyuki
author_sort Hayakawa, Hideki
collection PubMed
description This study was aimed to review the etiology and the outcomes of current posterior chamber phakic intraocular lens (Visian ICL, STAAR Surgical) extraction. This review comprised 770 eyes of 403 consecutive patients undergoing ICL extraction. We evaluated prevalence, etiology, uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), predictability, and patient satisfaction. ICL extraction was required in 8 of 770 (1.0%) eyes. The most common reason was the progression of the pre-existing cataract formation in 5 eyes (63%), followed by residual refractive errors in 3 eyes (38%). Of the 7 eyes targeted for emmetropia, 7 (100%) and 6 (86%) achieved UDVAs of 20/40 and 20/20 or better, respectively. Three eyes (38%) showed no change in CDVA, 3 eyes (38%) gained 1 line, 2 eyes (25%) gained 3 or more lines. 88% and 100% were within ± 0.5 and 1.0 diopter (D), respectively, of the targeted correction. Patient satisfaction improved significantly, from 3.0 ± 1.4 preoperatively, to 8.0 ± 2.4 postoperatively. No vision-threatening complications occurred. ICL extraction was required in approximately 1% of ICL-implanted eyes. Visual and refractive outcomes were good, and patient satisfaction was overall high, even in ICL-extracted eyes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7730447
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77304472020-12-14 Etiology and outcomes of current posterior chamber phakic intraocular lens extraction Hayakawa, Hideki Kamiya, Kazutaka Ando, Wakako Takahashi, Masahide Shoji, Nobuyuki Sci Rep Article This study was aimed to review the etiology and the outcomes of current posterior chamber phakic intraocular lens (Visian ICL, STAAR Surgical) extraction. This review comprised 770 eyes of 403 consecutive patients undergoing ICL extraction. We evaluated prevalence, etiology, uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), predictability, and patient satisfaction. ICL extraction was required in 8 of 770 (1.0%) eyes. The most common reason was the progression of the pre-existing cataract formation in 5 eyes (63%), followed by residual refractive errors in 3 eyes (38%). Of the 7 eyes targeted for emmetropia, 7 (100%) and 6 (86%) achieved UDVAs of 20/40 and 20/20 or better, respectively. Three eyes (38%) showed no change in CDVA, 3 eyes (38%) gained 1 line, 2 eyes (25%) gained 3 or more lines. 88% and 100% were within ± 0.5 and 1.0 diopter (D), respectively, of the targeted correction. Patient satisfaction improved significantly, from 3.0 ± 1.4 preoperatively, to 8.0 ± 2.4 postoperatively. No vision-threatening complications occurred. ICL extraction was required in approximately 1% of ICL-implanted eyes. Visual and refractive outcomes were good, and patient satisfaction was overall high, even in ICL-extracted eyes. Nature Publishing Group UK 2020-12-10 /pmc/articles/PMC7730447/ /pubmed/33303807 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-78661-z Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Hayakawa, Hideki
Kamiya, Kazutaka
Ando, Wakako
Takahashi, Masahide
Shoji, Nobuyuki
Etiology and outcomes of current posterior chamber phakic intraocular lens extraction
title Etiology and outcomes of current posterior chamber phakic intraocular lens extraction
title_full Etiology and outcomes of current posterior chamber phakic intraocular lens extraction
title_fullStr Etiology and outcomes of current posterior chamber phakic intraocular lens extraction
title_full_unstemmed Etiology and outcomes of current posterior chamber phakic intraocular lens extraction
title_short Etiology and outcomes of current posterior chamber phakic intraocular lens extraction
title_sort etiology and outcomes of current posterior chamber phakic intraocular lens extraction
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7730447/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33303807
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-78661-z
work_keys_str_mv AT hayakawahideki etiologyandoutcomesofcurrentposteriorchamberphakicintraocularlensextraction
AT kamiyakazutaka etiologyandoutcomesofcurrentposteriorchamberphakicintraocularlensextraction
AT andowakako etiologyandoutcomesofcurrentposteriorchamberphakicintraocularlensextraction
AT takahashimasahide etiologyandoutcomesofcurrentposteriorchamberphakicintraocularlensextraction
AT shojinobuyuki etiologyandoutcomesofcurrentposteriorchamberphakicintraocularlensextraction