Cargando…
Classification of Bee Pollen and Prediction of Sensory and Colorimetric Attributes—A Sensometric Fusion Approach by e-Nose, e-Tongue and NIR
The chemical composition of bee pollens differs greatly and depends primarily on the botanical origin of the product. Therefore, it is a crucially important task to discriminate pollens of different plant species. In our work, we aim to determine the applicability of microscopic pollen analysis, spe...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7730699/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33256130 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s20236768 |
_version_ | 1783621744454533120 |
---|---|
author | Sipos, László Végh, Rita Bodor, Zsanett Zaukuu, John-Lewis Zinia Hitka, Géza Bázár, György Kovacs, Zoltan |
author_facet | Sipos, László Végh, Rita Bodor, Zsanett Zaukuu, John-Lewis Zinia Hitka, Géza Bázár, György Kovacs, Zoltan |
author_sort | Sipos, László |
collection | PubMed |
description | The chemical composition of bee pollens differs greatly and depends primarily on the botanical origin of the product. Therefore, it is a crucially important task to discriminate pollens of different plant species. In our work, we aim to determine the applicability of microscopic pollen analysis, spectral colour measurement, sensory, NIR spectroscopy, e-nose and e-tongue methods for the classification of bee pollen of five different botanical origins. Chemometric methods (PCA, LDA) were used to classify bee pollen loads by analysing the statistical pattern of the samples and to determine the independent and combined effects of the above-mentioned methods. The results of the microscopic analysis identified 100% of sunflower, red clover, rapeseed and two polyfloral pollens mainly containing lakeshore bulrush and spiny plumeless thistle. The colour profiles of the samples were different for the five different samples. E-nose and NIR provided 100% classification accuracy, while e-tongue > 94% classification accuracy for the botanical origin identification using LDA. Partial least square regression (PLS) results built to regress on the sensory and spectral colour attributes using the fused data of NIR spectroscopy, e-nose and e-tongue showed higher than 0.8 R(2) during the validation except for one attribute, which was much higher compared to the independent models built for instruments. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7730699 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-77306992020-12-12 Classification of Bee Pollen and Prediction of Sensory and Colorimetric Attributes—A Sensometric Fusion Approach by e-Nose, e-Tongue and NIR Sipos, László Végh, Rita Bodor, Zsanett Zaukuu, John-Lewis Zinia Hitka, Géza Bázár, György Kovacs, Zoltan Sensors (Basel) Article The chemical composition of bee pollens differs greatly and depends primarily on the botanical origin of the product. Therefore, it is a crucially important task to discriminate pollens of different plant species. In our work, we aim to determine the applicability of microscopic pollen analysis, spectral colour measurement, sensory, NIR spectroscopy, e-nose and e-tongue methods for the classification of bee pollen of five different botanical origins. Chemometric methods (PCA, LDA) were used to classify bee pollen loads by analysing the statistical pattern of the samples and to determine the independent and combined effects of the above-mentioned methods. The results of the microscopic analysis identified 100% of sunflower, red clover, rapeseed and two polyfloral pollens mainly containing lakeshore bulrush and spiny plumeless thistle. The colour profiles of the samples were different for the five different samples. E-nose and NIR provided 100% classification accuracy, while e-tongue > 94% classification accuracy for the botanical origin identification using LDA. Partial least square regression (PLS) results built to regress on the sensory and spectral colour attributes using the fused data of NIR spectroscopy, e-nose and e-tongue showed higher than 0.8 R(2) during the validation except for one attribute, which was much higher compared to the independent models built for instruments. MDPI 2020-11-26 /pmc/articles/PMC7730699/ /pubmed/33256130 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s20236768 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Sipos, László Végh, Rita Bodor, Zsanett Zaukuu, John-Lewis Zinia Hitka, Géza Bázár, György Kovacs, Zoltan Classification of Bee Pollen and Prediction of Sensory and Colorimetric Attributes—A Sensometric Fusion Approach by e-Nose, e-Tongue and NIR |
title | Classification of Bee Pollen and Prediction of Sensory and Colorimetric Attributes—A Sensometric Fusion Approach by e-Nose, e-Tongue and NIR |
title_full | Classification of Bee Pollen and Prediction of Sensory and Colorimetric Attributes—A Sensometric Fusion Approach by e-Nose, e-Tongue and NIR |
title_fullStr | Classification of Bee Pollen and Prediction of Sensory and Colorimetric Attributes—A Sensometric Fusion Approach by e-Nose, e-Tongue and NIR |
title_full_unstemmed | Classification of Bee Pollen and Prediction of Sensory and Colorimetric Attributes—A Sensometric Fusion Approach by e-Nose, e-Tongue and NIR |
title_short | Classification of Bee Pollen and Prediction of Sensory and Colorimetric Attributes—A Sensometric Fusion Approach by e-Nose, e-Tongue and NIR |
title_sort | classification of bee pollen and prediction of sensory and colorimetric attributes—a sensometric fusion approach by e-nose, e-tongue and nir |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7730699/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33256130 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s20236768 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT siposlaszlo classificationofbeepollenandpredictionofsensoryandcolorimetricattributesasensometricfusionapproachbyenoseetongueandnir AT veghrita classificationofbeepollenandpredictionofsensoryandcolorimetricattributesasensometricfusionapproachbyenoseetongueandnir AT bodorzsanett classificationofbeepollenandpredictionofsensoryandcolorimetricattributesasensometricfusionapproachbyenoseetongueandnir AT zaukuujohnlewiszinia classificationofbeepollenandpredictionofsensoryandcolorimetricattributesasensometricfusionapproachbyenoseetongueandnir AT hitkageza classificationofbeepollenandpredictionofsensoryandcolorimetricattributesasensometricfusionapproachbyenoseetongueandnir AT bazargyorgy classificationofbeepollenandpredictionofsensoryandcolorimetricattributesasensometricfusionapproachbyenoseetongueandnir AT kovacszoltan classificationofbeepollenandpredictionofsensoryandcolorimetricattributesasensometricfusionapproachbyenoseetongueandnir |