Cargando…

Classification of Bee Pollen and Prediction of Sensory and Colorimetric Attributes—A Sensometric Fusion Approach by e-Nose, e-Tongue and NIR

The chemical composition of bee pollens differs greatly and depends primarily on the botanical origin of the product. Therefore, it is a crucially important task to discriminate pollens of different plant species. In our work, we aim to determine the applicability of microscopic pollen analysis, spe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sipos, László, Végh, Rita, Bodor, Zsanett, Zaukuu, John-Lewis Zinia, Hitka, Géza, Bázár, György, Kovacs, Zoltan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7730699/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33256130
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s20236768
_version_ 1783621744454533120
author Sipos, László
Végh, Rita
Bodor, Zsanett
Zaukuu, John-Lewis Zinia
Hitka, Géza
Bázár, György
Kovacs, Zoltan
author_facet Sipos, László
Végh, Rita
Bodor, Zsanett
Zaukuu, John-Lewis Zinia
Hitka, Géza
Bázár, György
Kovacs, Zoltan
author_sort Sipos, László
collection PubMed
description The chemical composition of bee pollens differs greatly and depends primarily on the botanical origin of the product. Therefore, it is a crucially important task to discriminate pollens of different plant species. In our work, we aim to determine the applicability of microscopic pollen analysis, spectral colour measurement, sensory, NIR spectroscopy, e-nose and e-tongue methods for the classification of bee pollen of five different botanical origins. Chemometric methods (PCA, LDA) were used to classify bee pollen loads by analysing the statistical pattern of the samples and to determine the independent and combined effects of the above-mentioned methods. The results of the microscopic analysis identified 100% of sunflower, red clover, rapeseed and two polyfloral pollens mainly containing lakeshore bulrush and spiny plumeless thistle. The colour profiles of the samples were different for the five different samples. E-nose and NIR provided 100% classification accuracy, while e-tongue > 94% classification accuracy for the botanical origin identification using LDA. Partial least square regression (PLS) results built to regress on the sensory and spectral colour attributes using the fused data of NIR spectroscopy, e-nose and e-tongue showed higher than 0.8 R(2) during the validation except for one attribute, which was much higher compared to the independent models built for instruments.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7730699
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77306992020-12-12 Classification of Bee Pollen and Prediction of Sensory and Colorimetric Attributes—A Sensometric Fusion Approach by e-Nose, e-Tongue and NIR Sipos, László Végh, Rita Bodor, Zsanett Zaukuu, John-Lewis Zinia Hitka, Géza Bázár, György Kovacs, Zoltan Sensors (Basel) Article The chemical composition of bee pollens differs greatly and depends primarily on the botanical origin of the product. Therefore, it is a crucially important task to discriminate pollens of different plant species. In our work, we aim to determine the applicability of microscopic pollen analysis, spectral colour measurement, sensory, NIR spectroscopy, e-nose and e-tongue methods for the classification of bee pollen of five different botanical origins. Chemometric methods (PCA, LDA) were used to classify bee pollen loads by analysing the statistical pattern of the samples and to determine the independent and combined effects of the above-mentioned methods. The results of the microscopic analysis identified 100% of sunflower, red clover, rapeseed and two polyfloral pollens mainly containing lakeshore bulrush and spiny plumeless thistle. The colour profiles of the samples were different for the five different samples. E-nose and NIR provided 100% classification accuracy, while e-tongue > 94% classification accuracy for the botanical origin identification using LDA. Partial least square regression (PLS) results built to regress on the sensory and spectral colour attributes using the fused data of NIR spectroscopy, e-nose and e-tongue showed higher than 0.8 R(2) during the validation except for one attribute, which was much higher compared to the independent models built for instruments. MDPI 2020-11-26 /pmc/articles/PMC7730699/ /pubmed/33256130 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s20236768 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Sipos, László
Végh, Rita
Bodor, Zsanett
Zaukuu, John-Lewis Zinia
Hitka, Géza
Bázár, György
Kovacs, Zoltan
Classification of Bee Pollen and Prediction of Sensory and Colorimetric Attributes—A Sensometric Fusion Approach by e-Nose, e-Tongue and NIR
title Classification of Bee Pollen and Prediction of Sensory and Colorimetric Attributes—A Sensometric Fusion Approach by e-Nose, e-Tongue and NIR
title_full Classification of Bee Pollen and Prediction of Sensory and Colorimetric Attributes—A Sensometric Fusion Approach by e-Nose, e-Tongue and NIR
title_fullStr Classification of Bee Pollen and Prediction of Sensory and Colorimetric Attributes—A Sensometric Fusion Approach by e-Nose, e-Tongue and NIR
title_full_unstemmed Classification of Bee Pollen and Prediction of Sensory and Colorimetric Attributes—A Sensometric Fusion Approach by e-Nose, e-Tongue and NIR
title_short Classification of Bee Pollen and Prediction of Sensory and Colorimetric Attributes—A Sensometric Fusion Approach by e-Nose, e-Tongue and NIR
title_sort classification of bee pollen and prediction of sensory and colorimetric attributes—a sensometric fusion approach by e-nose, e-tongue and nir
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7730699/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33256130
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s20236768
work_keys_str_mv AT siposlaszlo classificationofbeepollenandpredictionofsensoryandcolorimetricattributesasensometricfusionapproachbyenoseetongueandnir
AT veghrita classificationofbeepollenandpredictionofsensoryandcolorimetricattributesasensometricfusionapproachbyenoseetongueandnir
AT bodorzsanett classificationofbeepollenandpredictionofsensoryandcolorimetricattributesasensometricfusionapproachbyenoseetongueandnir
AT zaukuujohnlewiszinia classificationofbeepollenandpredictionofsensoryandcolorimetricattributesasensometricfusionapproachbyenoseetongueandnir
AT hitkageza classificationofbeepollenandpredictionofsensoryandcolorimetricattributesasensometricfusionapproachbyenoseetongueandnir
AT bazargyorgy classificationofbeepollenandpredictionofsensoryandcolorimetricattributesasensometricfusionapproachbyenoseetongueandnir
AT kovacszoltan classificationofbeepollenandpredictionofsensoryandcolorimetricattributesasensometricfusionapproachbyenoseetongueandnir