Cargando…

Comparison of Carbon Supports in Anion Exchange Membrane Fuel Cells

Anion exchange membrane fuel cells (AEMFCs) are attractive alternatives to proton exchange membrane fuel cells due to their ability to employ nonprecious metals as catalysts, reducing the cost of AEMFC devices. This paper presents an experimental exploration of the carbon support material effects on...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Truong, Van Men, Duong, Ngoc Bich, Yang, Hsiharng
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7730999/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33256129
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma13235370
_version_ 1783621814556033024
author Truong, Van Men
Duong, Ngoc Bich
Yang, Hsiharng
author_facet Truong, Van Men
Duong, Ngoc Bich
Yang, Hsiharng
author_sort Truong, Van Men
collection PubMed
description Anion exchange membrane fuel cells (AEMFCs) are attractive alternatives to proton exchange membrane fuel cells due to their ability to employ nonprecious metals as catalysts, reducing the cost of AEMFC devices. This paper presents an experimental exploration of the carbon support material effects on AEMFC performance. The silver (Ag) nanoparticles supported on three types of carbon materials including acetylene carbon (AC), carbon black (CB), and multiwalled carbon nanotube (MWCNT)—Ag/AC, Ag/CB, and Ag/MWCNT, respectively—were prepared using the wet impregnation method. The silver loading in the catalysts was designed as 60 wt.% during the synthesizing process, which was examined using thermogravimetric analysis. The elemental composition of the prepared Ag/AC, Ag/CB, and Ag/MWCNT catalysts was confirmed using X-ray diffraction analysis. The nanoparticle size of Ag attached on carbon particles or carbon nanotubes, as observed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM), was around 50 nm. For the performance tests of a single AEMFC, the obtained results indicate that the maximum power density using Ag/MWCNT as the cathode catalyst (356.5 mW·cm(−2)) was higher than that using Ag/AC (329.3 mW·cm(−2)) and Ag/CB (256.6 mW·cm(−2)). The better cell performance obtained using a MWCNT support can be ascribed to the higher electrical conductivity and the larger electrochemical active surface area calculated from cyclic voltammetry measurements.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7730999
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77309992020-12-12 Comparison of Carbon Supports in Anion Exchange Membrane Fuel Cells Truong, Van Men Duong, Ngoc Bich Yang, Hsiharng Materials (Basel) Article Anion exchange membrane fuel cells (AEMFCs) are attractive alternatives to proton exchange membrane fuel cells due to their ability to employ nonprecious metals as catalysts, reducing the cost of AEMFC devices. This paper presents an experimental exploration of the carbon support material effects on AEMFC performance. The silver (Ag) nanoparticles supported on three types of carbon materials including acetylene carbon (AC), carbon black (CB), and multiwalled carbon nanotube (MWCNT)—Ag/AC, Ag/CB, and Ag/MWCNT, respectively—were prepared using the wet impregnation method. The silver loading in the catalysts was designed as 60 wt.% during the synthesizing process, which was examined using thermogravimetric analysis. The elemental composition of the prepared Ag/AC, Ag/CB, and Ag/MWCNT catalysts was confirmed using X-ray diffraction analysis. The nanoparticle size of Ag attached on carbon particles or carbon nanotubes, as observed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM), was around 50 nm. For the performance tests of a single AEMFC, the obtained results indicate that the maximum power density using Ag/MWCNT as the cathode catalyst (356.5 mW·cm(−2)) was higher than that using Ag/AC (329.3 mW·cm(−2)) and Ag/CB (256.6 mW·cm(−2)). The better cell performance obtained using a MWCNT support can be ascribed to the higher electrical conductivity and the larger electrochemical active surface area calculated from cyclic voltammetry measurements. MDPI 2020-11-26 /pmc/articles/PMC7730999/ /pubmed/33256129 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma13235370 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Truong, Van Men
Duong, Ngoc Bich
Yang, Hsiharng
Comparison of Carbon Supports in Anion Exchange Membrane Fuel Cells
title Comparison of Carbon Supports in Anion Exchange Membrane Fuel Cells
title_full Comparison of Carbon Supports in Anion Exchange Membrane Fuel Cells
title_fullStr Comparison of Carbon Supports in Anion Exchange Membrane Fuel Cells
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Carbon Supports in Anion Exchange Membrane Fuel Cells
title_short Comparison of Carbon Supports in Anion Exchange Membrane Fuel Cells
title_sort comparison of carbon supports in anion exchange membrane fuel cells
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7730999/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33256129
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma13235370
work_keys_str_mv AT truongvanmen comparisonofcarbonsupportsinanionexchangemembranefuelcells
AT duongngocbich comparisonofcarbonsupportsinanionexchangemembranefuelcells
AT yanghsiharng comparisonofcarbonsupportsinanionexchangemembranefuelcells