Cargando…
The Role of Features Types and Personalized Assessment in Detecting Affective State Using Dry Electrode EEG
Assessing the human affective state using electroencephalography (EEG) have shown good potential but failed to demonstrate reliable performance in real-life applications. Especially if one applies a setup that might impact affective processing and relies on generalized models of affect. Additionally...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7731105/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33260624 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s20236810 |
_version_ | 1783621832435302400 |
---|---|
author | Pradhapan, Paruthi Velazquez, Emmanuel Rios Witteveen, Jolanda A. Tonoyan, Yelena Mihajlović, Vojkan |
author_facet | Pradhapan, Paruthi Velazquez, Emmanuel Rios Witteveen, Jolanda A. Tonoyan, Yelena Mihajlović, Vojkan |
author_sort | Pradhapan, Paruthi |
collection | PubMed |
description | Assessing the human affective state using electroencephalography (EEG) have shown good potential but failed to demonstrate reliable performance in real-life applications. Especially if one applies a setup that might impact affective processing and relies on generalized models of affect. Additionally, using subjective assessment of ones affect as ground truth has often been disputed. To shed the light on the former challenge we explored the use of a convenient EEG system with 20 participants to capture their reaction to affective movie clips in a naturalistic setting. Employing state-of-the-art machine learning approach demonstrated that the highest performance is reached when combining linear features, namely symmetry features and single-channel features, with nonlinear ones derived by a multiscale entropy approach. Nevertheless, the best performance, reflected in the highest F1-score achieved in a binary classification task for valence was 0.71 and for arousal 0.62. The performance was 10–20% better compared to using ratings provided by 13 independent raters. We argue that affective self-assessment might be underrated and it is crucial to account for personal differences in both perception and physiological response to affective cues. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7731105 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-77311052020-12-12 The Role of Features Types and Personalized Assessment in Detecting Affective State Using Dry Electrode EEG Pradhapan, Paruthi Velazquez, Emmanuel Rios Witteveen, Jolanda A. Tonoyan, Yelena Mihajlović, Vojkan Sensors (Basel) Article Assessing the human affective state using electroencephalography (EEG) have shown good potential but failed to demonstrate reliable performance in real-life applications. Especially if one applies a setup that might impact affective processing and relies on generalized models of affect. Additionally, using subjective assessment of ones affect as ground truth has often been disputed. To shed the light on the former challenge we explored the use of a convenient EEG system with 20 participants to capture their reaction to affective movie clips in a naturalistic setting. Employing state-of-the-art machine learning approach demonstrated that the highest performance is reached when combining linear features, namely symmetry features and single-channel features, with nonlinear ones derived by a multiscale entropy approach. Nevertheless, the best performance, reflected in the highest F1-score achieved in a binary classification task for valence was 0.71 and for arousal 0.62. The performance was 10–20% better compared to using ratings provided by 13 independent raters. We argue that affective self-assessment might be underrated and it is crucial to account for personal differences in both perception and physiological response to affective cues. MDPI 2020-11-28 /pmc/articles/PMC7731105/ /pubmed/33260624 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s20236810 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Pradhapan, Paruthi Velazquez, Emmanuel Rios Witteveen, Jolanda A. Tonoyan, Yelena Mihajlović, Vojkan The Role of Features Types and Personalized Assessment in Detecting Affective State Using Dry Electrode EEG |
title | The Role of Features Types and Personalized Assessment in Detecting Affective State Using Dry Electrode EEG |
title_full | The Role of Features Types and Personalized Assessment in Detecting Affective State Using Dry Electrode EEG |
title_fullStr | The Role of Features Types and Personalized Assessment in Detecting Affective State Using Dry Electrode EEG |
title_full_unstemmed | The Role of Features Types and Personalized Assessment in Detecting Affective State Using Dry Electrode EEG |
title_short | The Role of Features Types and Personalized Assessment in Detecting Affective State Using Dry Electrode EEG |
title_sort | role of features types and personalized assessment in detecting affective state using dry electrode eeg |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7731105/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33260624 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s20236810 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pradhapanparuthi theroleoffeaturestypesandpersonalizedassessmentindetectingaffectivestateusingdryelectrodeeeg AT velazquezemmanuelrios theroleoffeaturestypesandpersonalizedassessmentindetectingaffectivestateusingdryelectrodeeeg AT witteveenjolandaa theroleoffeaturestypesandpersonalizedassessmentindetectingaffectivestateusingdryelectrodeeeg AT tonoyanyelena theroleoffeaturestypesandpersonalizedassessmentindetectingaffectivestateusingdryelectrodeeeg AT mihajlovicvojkan theroleoffeaturestypesandpersonalizedassessmentindetectingaffectivestateusingdryelectrodeeeg AT pradhapanparuthi roleoffeaturestypesandpersonalizedassessmentindetectingaffectivestateusingdryelectrodeeeg AT velazquezemmanuelrios roleoffeaturestypesandpersonalizedassessmentindetectingaffectivestateusingdryelectrodeeeg AT witteveenjolandaa roleoffeaturestypesandpersonalizedassessmentindetectingaffectivestateusingdryelectrodeeeg AT tonoyanyelena roleoffeaturestypesandpersonalizedassessmentindetectingaffectivestateusingdryelectrodeeeg AT mihajlovicvojkan roleoffeaturestypesandpersonalizedassessmentindetectingaffectivestateusingdryelectrodeeeg |