Cargando…

Machine learning and individual variability in electric field characteristics predict tDCS treatment response

BACKGROUND: Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is widely investigated as a therapeutic tool to enhance cognitive function in older adults with and without neurodegenerative disease. Prior research demonstrates that electric current delivery to the brain can vary significantly across indi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Albizu, Alejandro, Fang, Ruogu, Indahlastari, Aprinda, O’Shea, Andrew, Stolte, Skylar E., See, Kyle B., Boutzoukas, Emanuel M., Kraft, Jessica N., Nissim, Nicole R., Woods, Adam J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7731513/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33049412
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.brs.2020.10.001
_version_ 1783621914730692608
author Albizu, Alejandro
Fang, Ruogu
Indahlastari, Aprinda
O’Shea, Andrew
Stolte, Skylar E.
See, Kyle B.
Boutzoukas, Emanuel M.
Kraft, Jessica N.
Nissim, Nicole R.
Woods, Adam J.
author_facet Albizu, Alejandro
Fang, Ruogu
Indahlastari, Aprinda
O’Shea, Andrew
Stolte, Skylar E.
See, Kyle B.
Boutzoukas, Emanuel M.
Kraft, Jessica N.
Nissim, Nicole R.
Woods, Adam J.
author_sort Albizu, Alejandro
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is widely investigated as a therapeutic tool to enhance cognitive function in older adults with and without neurodegenerative disease. Prior research demonstrates that electric current delivery to the brain can vary significantly across individuals. Quantification of this variability could enable person-specific optimization of tDCS outcomes. This pilot study used machine learning and MRI-derived electric field models to predict working memory improvements as a proof of concept for precision cognitive intervention. METHODS: Fourteen healthy older adults received 20 minutes of 2 mA tDCS stimulation (F3/F4) during a two-week cognitive training intervention. Participants performed an N-back working memory task pre-/post-intervention. MRI-derived current models were passed through a linear Support Vector Machine (SVM) learning algorithm to characterize crucial tDCS current components (intensity and direction) that induced working memory improvements in tDCS responders versus non-responders. MAIN RESULTS: SVM models of tDCS current components had 86% overall accuracy in classifying treatment responders vs. non-responders, with current intensity producing the best overall model differentiating changes in working memory performance. Median current intensity and direction in brain regions near the electrodes were positively related to intervention responses (r = 0:811, p < 0:001 and r = 0:774, p = 0:001). CONCLUSIONS: This study provides the first evidence that pattern recognition analyses of MRI-derived tDCS current models can provide individual prognostic classification of tDCS treatment response with 86% accuracy. Individual differences in current intensity and direction play important roles in determining treatment response to tDCS. These findings provide important insights into mechanisms of tDCS response as well as proof of concept for future precision dosing models of tDCS intervention.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7731513
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77315132020-12-11 Machine learning and individual variability in electric field characteristics predict tDCS treatment response Albizu, Alejandro Fang, Ruogu Indahlastari, Aprinda O’Shea, Andrew Stolte, Skylar E. See, Kyle B. Boutzoukas, Emanuel M. Kraft, Jessica N. Nissim, Nicole R. Woods, Adam J. Brain Stimul Article BACKGROUND: Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is widely investigated as a therapeutic tool to enhance cognitive function in older adults with and without neurodegenerative disease. Prior research demonstrates that electric current delivery to the brain can vary significantly across individuals. Quantification of this variability could enable person-specific optimization of tDCS outcomes. This pilot study used machine learning and MRI-derived electric field models to predict working memory improvements as a proof of concept for precision cognitive intervention. METHODS: Fourteen healthy older adults received 20 minutes of 2 mA tDCS stimulation (F3/F4) during a two-week cognitive training intervention. Participants performed an N-back working memory task pre-/post-intervention. MRI-derived current models were passed through a linear Support Vector Machine (SVM) learning algorithm to characterize crucial tDCS current components (intensity and direction) that induced working memory improvements in tDCS responders versus non-responders. MAIN RESULTS: SVM models of tDCS current components had 86% overall accuracy in classifying treatment responders vs. non-responders, with current intensity producing the best overall model differentiating changes in working memory performance. Median current intensity and direction in brain regions near the electrodes were positively related to intervention responses (r = 0:811, p < 0:001 and r = 0:774, p = 0:001). CONCLUSIONS: This study provides the first evidence that pattern recognition analyses of MRI-derived tDCS current models can provide individual prognostic classification of tDCS treatment response with 86% accuracy. Individual differences in current intensity and direction play important roles in determining treatment response to tDCS. These findings provide important insights into mechanisms of tDCS response as well as proof of concept for future precision dosing models of tDCS intervention. 2020-10-10 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7731513/ /pubmed/33049412 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.brs.2020.10.001 Text en This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Albizu, Alejandro
Fang, Ruogu
Indahlastari, Aprinda
O’Shea, Andrew
Stolte, Skylar E.
See, Kyle B.
Boutzoukas, Emanuel M.
Kraft, Jessica N.
Nissim, Nicole R.
Woods, Adam J.
Machine learning and individual variability in electric field characteristics predict tDCS treatment response
title Machine learning and individual variability in electric field characteristics predict tDCS treatment response
title_full Machine learning and individual variability in electric field characteristics predict tDCS treatment response
title_fullStr Machine learning and individual variability in electric field characteristics predict tDCS treatment response
title_full_unstemmed Machine learning and individual variability in electric field characteristics predict tDCS treatment response
title_short Machine learning and individual variability in electric field characteristics predict tDCS treatment response
title_sort machine learning and individual variability in electric field characteristics predict tdcs treatment response
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7731513/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33049412
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.brs.2020.10.001
work_keys_str_mv AT albizualejandro machinelearningandindividualvariabilityinelectricfieldcharacteristicspredicttdcstreatmentresponse
AT fangruogu machinelearningandindividualvariabilityinelectricfieldcharacteristicspredicttdcstreatmentresponse
AT indahlastariaprinda machinelearningandindividualvariabilityinelectricfieldcharacteristicspredicttdcstreatmentresponse
AT osheaandrew machinelearningandindividualvariabilityinelectricfieldcharacteristicspredicttdcstreatmentresponse
AT stolteskylare machinelearningandindividualvariabilityinelectricfieldcharacteristicspredicttdcstreatmentresponse
AT seekyleb machinelearningandindividualvariabilityinelectricfieldcharacteristicspredicttdcstreatmentresponse
AT boutzoukasemanuelm machinelearningandindividualvariabilityinelectricfieldcharacteristicspredicttdcstreatmentresponse
AT kraftjessican machinelearningandindividualvariabilityinelectricfieldcharacteristicspredicttdcstreatmentresponse
AT nissimnicoler machinelearningandindividualvariabilityinelectricfieldcharacteristicspredicttdcstreatmentresponse
AT woodsadamj machinelearningandindividualvariabilityinelectricfieldcharacteristicspredicttdcstreatmentresponse