Cargando…
Machine learning and individual variability in electric field characteristics predict tDCS treatment response
BACKGROUND: Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is widely investigated as a therapeutic tool to enhance cognitive function in older adults with and without neurodegenerative disease. Prior research demonstrates that electric current delivery to the brain can vary significantly across indi...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7731513/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33049412 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.brs.2020.10.001 |
_version_ | 1783621914730692608 |
---|---|
author | Albizu, Alejandro Fang, Ruogu Indahlastari, Aprinda O’Shea, Andrew Stolte, Skylar E. See, Kyle B. Boutzoukas, Emanuel M. Kraft, Jessica N. Nissim, Nicole R. Woods, Adam J. |
author_facet | Albizu, Alejandro Fang, Ruogu Indahlastari, Aprinda O’Shea, Andrew Stolte, Skylar E. See, Kyle B. Boutzoukas, Emanuel M. Kraft, Jessica N. Nissim, Nicole R. Woods, Adam J. |
author_sort | Albizu, Alejandro |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is widely investigated as a therapeutic tool to enhance cognitive function in older adults with and without neurodegenerative disease. Prior research demonstrates that electric current delivery to the brain can vary significantly across individuals. Quantification of this variability could enable person-specific optimization of tDCS outcomes. This pilot study used machine learning and MRI-derived electric field models to predict working memory improvements as a proof of concept for precision cognitive intervention. METHODS: Fourteen healthy older adults received 20 minutes of 2 mA tDCS stimulation (F3/F4) during a two-week cognitive training intervention. Participants performed an N-back working memory task pre-/post-intervention. MRI-derived current models were passed through a linear Support Vector Machine (SVM) learning algorithm to characterize crucial tDCS current components (intensity and direction) that induced working memory improvements in tDCS responders versus non-responders. MAIN RESULTS: SVM models of tDCS current components had 86% overall accuracy in classifying treatment responders vs. non-responders, with current intensity producing the best overall model differentiating changes in working memory performance. Median current intensity and direction in brain regions near the electrodes were positively related to intervention responses (r = 0:811, p < 0:001 and r = 0:774, p = 0:001). CONCLUSIONS: This study provides the first evidence that pattern recognition analyses of MRI-derived tDCS current models can provide individual prognostic classification of tDCS treatment response with 86% accuracy. Individual differences in current intensity and direction play important roles in determining treatment response to tDCS. These findings provide important insights into mechanisms of tDCS response as well as proof of concept for future precision dosing models of tDCS intervention. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7731513 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-77315132020-12-11 Machine learning and individual variability in electric field characteristics predict tDCS treatment response Albizu, Alejandro Fang, Ruogu Indahlastari, Aprinda O’Shea, Andrew Stolte, Skylar E. See, Kyle B. Boutzoukas, Emanuel M. Kraft, Jessica N. Nissim, Nicole R. Woods, Adam J. Brain Stimul Article BACKGROUND: Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is widely investigated as a therapeutic tool to enhance cognitive function in older adults with and without neurodegenerative disease. Prior research demonstrates that electric current delivery to the brain can vary significantly across individuals. Quantification of this variability could enable person-specific optimization of tDCS outcomes. This pilot study used machine learning and MRI-derived electric field models to predict working memory improvements as a proof of concept for precision cognitive intervention. METHODS: Fourteen healthy older adults received 20 minutes of 2 mA tDCS stimulation (F3/F4) during a two-week cognitive training intervention. Participants performed an N-back working memory task pre-/post-intervention. MRI-derived current models were passed through a linear Support Vector Machine (SVM) learning algorithm to characterize crucial tDCS current components (intensity and direction) that induced working memory improvements in tDCS responders versus non-responders. MAIN RESULTS: SVM models of tDCS current components had 86% overall accuracy in classifying treatment responders vs. non-responders, with current intensity producing the best overall model differentiating changes in working memory performance. Median current intensity and direction in brain regions near the electrodes were positively related to intervention responses (r = 0:811, p < 0:001 and r = 0:774, p = 0:001). CONCLUSIONS: This study provides the first evidence that pattern recognition analyses of MRI-derived tDCS current models can provide individual prognostic classification of tDCS treatment response with 86% accuracy. Individual differences in current intensity and direction play important roles in determining treatment response to tDCS. These findings provide important insights into mechanisms of tDCS response as well as proof of concept for future precision dosing models of tDCS intervention. 2020-10-10 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7731513/ /pubmed/33049412 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.brs.2020.10.001 Text en This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Albizu, Alejandro Fang, Ruogu Indahlastari, Aprinda O’Shea, Andrew Stolte, Skylar E. See, Kyle B. Boutzoukas, Emanuel M. Kraft, Jessica N. Nissim, Nicole R. Woods, Adam J. Machine learning and individual variability in electric field characteristics predict tDCS treatment response |
title | Machine learning and individual variability in electric field characteristics predict tDCS treatment response |
title_full | Machine learning and individual variability in electric field characteristics predict tDCS treatment response |
title_fullStr | Machine learning and individual variability in electric field characteristics predict tDCS treatment response |
title_full_unstemmed | Machine learning and individual variability in electric field characteristics predict tDCS treatment response |
title_short | Machine learning and individual variability in electric field characteristics predict tDCS treatment response |
title_sort | machine learning and individual variability in electric field characteristics predict tdcs treatment response |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7731513/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33049412 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.brs.2020.10.001 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT albizualejandro machinelearningandindividualvariabilityinelectricfieldcharacteristicspredicttdcstreatmentresponse AT fangruogu machinelearningandindividualvariabilityinelectricfieldcharacteristicspredicttdcstreatmentresponse AT indahlastariaprinda machinelearningandindividualvariabilityinelectricfieldcharacteristicspredicttdcstreatmentresponse AT osheaandrew machinelearningandindividualvariabilityinelectricfieldcharacteristicspredicttdcstreatmentresponse AT stolteskylare machinelearningandindividualvariabilityinelectricfieldcharacteristicspredicttdcstreatmentresponse AT seekyleb machinelearningandindividualvariabilityinelectricfieldcharacteristicspredicttdcstreatmentresponse AT boutzoukasemanuelm machinelearningandindividualvariabilityinelectricfieldcharacteristicspredicttdcstreatmentresponse AT kraftjessican machinelearningandindividualvariabilityinelectricfieldcharacteristicspredicttdcstreatmentresponse AT nissimnicoler machinelearningandindividualvariabilityinelectricfieldcharacteristicspredicttdcstreatmentresponse AT woodsadamj machinelearningandindividualvariabilityinelectricfieldcharacteristicspredicttdcstreatmentresponse |